NCT01402011

Brief Summary

HYPOTHESIS: Prolotherapy, the injection of a growth promoting solution in injured ligaments and tendons of the shoulder is an effective treatment that decreases pain, increases functional capacity and promotes healing better and in less time than standard treatment with physiotherapy. OVERVIEW: 75 subjects with rotator cuff tendinopathy proven by ultrasound will be recruited and assigned randomly into one of three groups of 25 to receive one of these three different treatments: Group A (test): 25% dextrose with 0.1% lidocaine, injected into the tendons and ligaments Group B (control): 0.1% lidocaine injected in the rotator cuff tendons and ligaments Group C(control): 0.1% lidocaine injected subcutaneously above these structures All subjects will receive physiotherapy every other week for three months. To avoid placebo effects, patients, the radiologist and physiotherapist will not know to which treatment group the patients belong; the physician administering the injections will not be involved in assessing disability before or after treatment. (Note: The physician will know which patients belong to group C because it will be obvious: they are delivering a subcutaneous - versus a joint - injection). There will be three sets of injections - one set per month for 3 months. The patients' condition will be tracked for nine months after the first treatment, to monitor changes in 3 outcome measures: pain (VAS and Rx #s), function (DASH and PESS), and tendon healing (as assessed by ultrasound).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
77

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2010

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2010

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 20, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 26, 2011

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2013

Completed
5.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 14, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 14, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

June 20, 2011

Results QC Date

December 1, 2015

Last Update Submit

August 10, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Prolotherapyregenerative injection therapydextrose injections

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Visual Analog Pain Scale 0= no Pain 10 = Maximum Pain

    Subject marks his pain level at rest, at work, doing sports on a 10 cm scale. The maximum pain level among the 3 different activities was recorded.

    20 minutes before first injection on first day of patient visit

  • Change From Baseline of Visual Analog Pain Scale at 3 Months

    Subject marks his pain level at rest, at work, doing sports on a 10 cm scale. Maximum of pain scores rest, work, sport recorded. Calculated as pain at baseline - pain at 3 months. VAS scale is from 0 = no pain to 10 = maximum pain

    baseline and three months

  • Change From Baseline in Maximum Pain Score at 9 Months

    Participants were asked about pain at rest, at work, doing sports. The maximum pain reported on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (extreme pain) was recorded for each participant. Maximum of pain scores rest, work, sport recorded. Calculated as pain at baseline - pain at 9 months.

    baseline and 9 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Rotator Cuff Ultrasound, Ultrasound Shoulder Pathology Rating Scale

    20 minutes before first injection on first day of patient visit and at on average 9.4 months

  • Physical Examination of the Shoulder Scale

    20 minutes before first injection on first day of patient visit and at 3 months

  • Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire

    20 minutes before the first injection and at 3 months

  • Nine Month Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Nine months after first injection treatment appointment

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Total Prescription Pain Medication Used

    20 minutes before first injection on first day of patient visit

  • Visual Analog Pain Scale

    two months

  • Visual Analog Pain Scale

    one month

Study Arms (3)

25% dextrose in shoulder entheses

EXPERIMENTAL

25% dextrose and .1% lidocaine injected in the shoulder entheses (ligament and tendon insertions on the periosteum).

Procedure: 25% dextrose in shoulder entheses

.1% lidocaine in shoulder entheses

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

.1% lidocaine injected in the shoulder entheses (ligament and tendon insertions on the periosteum).

Procedure: .1% lidocaine in shoulder entheses

.1% lidocaine subcu. above shouldr enth.

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

.1% lidocaine injected subcutaneously above the shoulder entheses (ligament and tendon insertions on the periosteum).

Procedure: .1% lidocaine subcu. above shouldr enth.

Interventions

injections of 1 mL of 25% dextrose and .1% lidocaine solution in the following tendons: supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor ( on greater tuberosity), subscapularis ( on lesser tuberosity), long tendon of biceps ( on supra-glenoid tubercle), short tendons of biceps on coracoid process, and the inferior glenohumeral ligament, anteriorly and posteriorly. If symptomatic the insertion of the teres minor and the triceps on the scapula.

Also known as: Prolotherapy, regenerative injection therapy
25% dextrose in shoulder entheses

injections of 1 mL of .1% lidocaine 'ssolution in the following tendons: supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor ( on greater tuberosity), subscapularis ( on lesser tuberosity), long tendon of biceps ( on supra-glenoid tubercle), short tendons of biceps on coracoid process, and the inferior glenohumeral ligament, anteriorly and posteriorly. If symptomatic the insertion of the teres minor and the triceps on the scapula.

Also known as: Active control injections
.1% lidocaine in shoulder entheses

injections of 1 mL of .1% lidocaine solution subcutaneously, above the following tendons: supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor ( on greater tuberosity), subscapularis ( on lesser tuberosity), long tendon of biceps ( on supra-glenoid tubercle), short tendons of biceps on coracoid process, and the inferior glenohumeral ligament, anteriorly and posteriorly. If symptomatic, above the insertion of the teres minor and the triceps on the scapula.

Also known as: Placebo injections
.1% lidocaine subcu. above shouldr enth.

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 74 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • consecutive patients over 19 and less than 75 years of age

You may not qualify if:

  • allergy to corn, as the dextrose solution is corn-based
  • allergy to local anesthetic
  • immune deficiency
  • conditions requiring anti-inflammatory medications including prednisone, corticosteroid injection less than eight weeks prior to the first set of injections
  • use of immune suppressants
  • symptomatic osteoarthritis of the gleno-humeral or acromio-clavicular joint
  • age over 75 or under 19
  • adhesive capsulitis based on a thorough physical examination, where shoulder flexion or abduction is below 100 °, horizontal adduction is below 30 °, the hand behind the back is below the waist, external rotation is less than 30 °
  • full thickness tear greater than 1.2 cm as seen on ultrasound
  • autoimmune disorders such as lupus or rheumatoid arthritis
  • neurological disorders including Parkinson, seizures, and dementias are excluded for patient safety during the procedures
  • HIV, viral hepatitis and other blood borne communicable diseases, to protect the investigators
  • calcium deposits greater than 8 mm in diameter
  • type III acromion as seen on x-ray
  • painful condition elsewhere in the body likely to cloud the subject's assessment of his shoulder pain
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Dr. Helene Bertrand Inc., 220-1940 Lonsdale Avenue

North Vancouver, British Columbia, V7M 2K2, Canada

Location

Active shoulder clinics, West Vancouver sports and orthopedic physiotherapy, 210- 575 16th Street

West Vancouver, British Columbia, V7V 4Y1, Canada

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Coombes BK, Bisset L, Vicenzino B. Efficacy and safety of corticosteroid injections and other injections for management of tendinopathy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2010 Nov 20;376(9754):1751-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61160-9. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

    PMID: 20970844BACKGROUND
  • Silverstein B, Welp E, Nelson N, Kalat J. Claims incidence of work-related disorders of the upper extremities: Washington state, 1987 through 1995. Am J Public Health. 1998 Dec;88(12):1827-33. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.12.1827.

    PMID: 9842381BACKGROUND
  • Stovitz SD, Johnson RJ. NSAIDs and musculoskeletal treatment: what is the clinical evidence? Phys Sportsmed. 2003 Jan;31(1):35-52. doi: 10.3810/psm.2003.01.160.

    PMID: 20086440BACKGROUND
  • Cohen DB, Kawamura S, Ehteshami JR, Rodeo SA. Indomethacin and celecoxib impair rotator cuff tendon-to-bone healing. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):362-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546505280428. Epub 2005 Oct 6.

    PMID: 16210573BACKGROUND
  • Gaujoux-Viala C, Dougados M, Gossec L. Efficacy and safety of steroid injections for shoulder and elbow tendonitis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Dec;68(12):1843-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.099572. Epub 2008 Dec 3.

    PMID: 19054817BACKGROUND
  • Lewis JS. Rotator cuff tendinopathy/subacromial impingement syndrome: is it time for a new method of assessment? Br J Sports Med. 2009 Apr;43(4):259-64. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052183. Epub 2008 Oct 6.

    PMID: 18838403BACKGROUND
  • Mansat P, Cofield RH, Kersten TE, Rowland CM. Complications of rotator cuff repair. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997 Apr;28(2):205-13. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70280-7.

    PMID: 9113716BACKGROUND
  • Brislin KJ, Field LD, Savoie FH 3rd. Complications after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2007 Feb;23(2):124-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.09.001.

    PMID: 17276218BACKGROUND
  • Liu X, Luo F, Pan K, Wu W, Chen H. High glucose upregulates connective tissue growth factor expression in human vascular smooth muscle cells. BMC Cell Biol. 2007 Jan 16;8:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-8-1.

    PMID: 17224075BACKGROUND
  • Fullerton BD. High-resolution ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging to document tissue repair after prolotherapy: a report of 3 cases. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Feb;89(2):377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.017.

    PMID: 18226666BACKGROUND
  • K. Dean Reeves, MD; Bradley D. Fullerton, MD, FAAPMR and Gaston Topol, MD Evidence-Based Regenerative Injection Therapy (Prolotherapy)in Sports Medicine sports Medicine Resource Manual 2008 Chapter 50.

    BACKGROUND
  • Scarpone M, Rabago DP, Zgierska A, Arbogast G, Snell E. The efficacy of prolotherapy for lateral epicondylosis: a pilot study. Clin J Sport Med. 2008 May;18(3):248-54. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318170fc87.

    PMID: 18469566BACKGROUND
  • Reeves KD, Hassanein K. Randomized prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study of dextrose prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis with or without ACL laxity. Altern Ther Health Med. 2000 Mar;6(2):68-74, 77-80.

    PMID: 10710805BACKGROUND
  • Reeves KD, Hassanein K. Randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled double-blind study of dextrose prolotherapy for osteoarthritic thumb and finger (DIP, PIP, and trapeziometacarpal) joints: evidence of clinical efficacy. J Altern Complement Med. 2000 Aug;6(4):311-20. doi: 10.1089/10755530050120673.

    PMID: 10976977BACKGROUND
  • David Rabago Prolotherapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain Complementary and alternative therapies in the aging population edited by Ronald Ross Watson chapter 2 15-44 Elsevier 2009

    BACKGROUND
  • Bertrand H, Reeves KD, Bennett CJ, Bicknell S, Cheng AL. Dextrose Prolotherapy Versus Control Injections in Painful Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jan;97(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.412. Epub 2015 Aug 22.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Injuries

Interventions

GlucoseProlotherapyLidocaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HexosesMonosaccharidesSugarsCarbohydratesComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsAcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Helene Bertrand, M.D., CCFP, LM
Organization
University of British Columbia Department of family practice

Study Officials

  • Helene Bertrand, MD, CCFP

    University of British Columbia, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
For the 25% dextrose and .1% lidocaine and the .1% lidocaine enthesis injections, only the pharmacist knew the contents of each participant's numbered bottle. For the .1% subcutaneous injections, both the pharmacist and the physician where aware of the contents. There was a small c on the label. Only one participant asked the meaning of this letter, and he was told it stood for "contents".
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants were randomly allocated into 3 groups to receive injections of 25% dextrose in .1% lidocaine or .1% lidocaine in the shoulder entheses, the 3rd group received .1% lidocaine subcutaneously above the shoulder entheses.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D., C.M, CCFP

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2011

First Posted

July 26, 2011

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion

June 1, 2013

Study Completion

June 1, 2013

Last Updated

August 14, 2018

Results First Posted

August 14, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The de-identified database Is now available on request to Doctor Helene Bertrand at heleneb@mail.UBC.ca

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
The data will be available from January 2015 to January 2020
Access Criteria
This study was published in Archives Of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation 2016 volume 97 pages 17 - 25 under the title: Dextrose Prolotherapy Versus Control Injections In Painful Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

Locations