Study of 25% Dextrose Injections in Shoulder Ligaments and Tendons to Promote Their Healing
Prolotherapy
Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Randomized and Blinded Comparison of Superficial and Deep Injection Methods
2 other identifiers
interventional
77
1 country
2
Brief Summary
HYPOTHESIS: Prolotherapy, the injection of a growth promoting solution in injured ligaments and tendons of the shoulder is an effective treatment that decreases pain, increases functional capacity and promotes healing better and in less time than standard treatment with physiotherapy. OVERVIEW: 75 subjects with rotator cuff tendinopathy proven by ultrasound will be recruited and assigned randomly into one of three groups of 25 to receive one of these three different treatments: Group A (test): 25% dextrose with 0.1% lidocaine, injected into the tendons and ligaments Group B (control): 0.1% lidocaine injected in the rotator cuff tendons and ligaments Group C(control): 0.1% lidocaine injected subcutaneously above these structures All subjects will receive physiotherapy every other week for three months. To avoid placebo effects, patients, the radiologist and physiotherapist will not know to which treatment group the patients belong; the physician administering the injections will not be involved in assessing disability before or after treatment. (Note: The physician will know which patients belong to group C because it will be obvious: they are delivering a subcutaneous - versus a joint - injection). There will be three sets of injections - one set per month for 3 months. The patients' condition will be tracked for nine months after the first treatment, to monitor changes in 3 outcome measures: pain (VAS and Rx #s), function (DASH and PESS), and tendon healing (as assessed by ultrasound).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 20, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 14, 2018
CompletedAugust 14, 2018
August 1, 2018
2.6 years
June 20, 2011
December 1, 2015
August 10, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Visual Analog Pain Scale 0= no Pain 10 = Maximum Pain
Subject marks his pain level at rest, at work, doing sports on a 10 cm scale. The maximum pain level among the 3 different activities was recorded.
20 minutes before first injection on first day of patient visit
Change From Baseline of Visual Analog Pain Scale at 3 Months
Subject marks his pain level at rest, at work, doing sports on a 10 cm scale. Maximum of pain scores rest, work, sport recorded. Calculated as pain at baseline - pain at 3 months. VAS scale is from 0 = no pain to 10 = maximum pain
baseline and three months
Change From Baseline in Maximum Pain Score at 9 Months
Participants were asked about pain at rest, at work, doing sports. The maximum pain reported on a scale ranging from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (extreme pain) was recorded for each participant. Maximum of pain scores rest, work, sport recorded. Calculated as pain at baseline - pain at 9 months.
baseline and 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Rotator Cuff Ultrasound, Ultrasound Shoulder Pathology Rating Scale
20 minutes before first injection on first day of patient visit and at on average 9.4 months
Physical Examination of the Shoulder Scale
20 minutes before first injection on first day of patient visit and at 3 months
Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire
20 minutes before the first injection and at 3 months
Nine Month Satisfaction Questionnaire
Nine months after first injection treatment appointment
Other Outcomes (3)
Total Prescription Pain Medication Used
20 minutes before first injection on first day of patient visit
Visual Analog Pain Scale
two months
Visual Analog Pain Scale
one month
Study Arms (3)
25% dextrose in shoulder entheses
EXPERIMENTAL25% dextrose and .1% lidocaine injected in the shoulder entheses (ligament and tendon insertions on the periosteum).
.1% lidocaine in shoulder entheses
ACTIVE COMPARATOR.1% lidocaine injected in the shoulder entheses (ligament and tendon insertions on the periosteum).
.1% lidocaine subcu. above shouldr enth.
PLACEBO COMPARATOR.1% lidocaine injected subcutaneously above the shoulder entheses (ligament and tendon insertions on the periosteum).
Interventions
injections of 1 mL of 25% dextrose and .1% lidocaine solution in the following tendons: supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor ( on greater tuberosity), subscapularis ( on lesser tuberosity), long tendon of biceps ( on supra-glenoid tubercle), short tendons of biceps on coracoid process, and the inferior glenohumeral ligament, anteriorly and posteriorly. If symptomatic the insertion of the teres minor and the triceps on the scapula.
injections of 1 mL of .1% lidocaine 'ssolution in the following tendons: supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor ( on greater tuberosity), subscapularis ( on lesser tuberosity), long tendon of biceps ( on supra-glenoid tubercle), short tendons of biceps on coracoid process, and the inferior glenohumeral ligament, anteriorly and posteriorly. If symptomatic the insertion of the teres minor and the triceps on the scapula.
injections of 1 mL of .1% lidocaine solution subcutaneously, above the following tendons: supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor ( on greater tuberosity), subscapularis ( on lesser tuberosity), long tendon of biceps ( on supra-glenoid tubercle), short tendons of biceps on coracoid process, and the inferior glenohumeral ligament, anteriorly and posteriorly. If symptomatic, above the insertion of the teres minor and the triceps on the scapula.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- consecutive patients over 19 and less than 75 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- allergy to corn, as the dextrose solution is corn-based
- allergy to local anesthetic
- immune deficiency
- conditions requiring anti-inflammatory medications including prednisone, corticosteroid injection less than eight weeks prior to the first set of injections
- use of immune suppressants
- symptomatic osteoarthritis of the gleno-humeral or acromio-clavicular joint
- age over 75 or under 19
- adhesive capsulitis based on a thorough physical examination, where shoulder flexion or abduction is below 100 °, horizontal adduction is below 30 °, the hand behind the back is below the waist, external rotation is less than 30 °
- full thickness tear greater than 1.2 cm as seen on ultrasound
- autoimmune disorders such as lupus or rheumatoid arthritis
- neurological disorders including Parkinson, seizures, and dementias are excluded for patient safety during the procedures
- HIV, viral hepatitis and other blood borne communicable diseases, to protect the investigators
- calcium deposits greater than 8 mm in diameter
- type III acromion as seen on x-ray
- painful condition elsewhere in the body likely to cloud the subject's assessment of his shoulder pain
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of British Columbialead
- WorkSafe BCcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Dr. Helene Bertrand Inc., 220-1940 Lonsdale Avenue
North Vancouver, British Columbia, V7M 2K2, Canada
Active shoulder clinics, West Vancouver sports and orthopedic physiotherapy, 210- 575 16th Street
West Vancouver, British Columbia, V7V 4Y1, Canada
Related Publications (16)
Coombes BK, Bisset L, Vicenzino B. Efficacy and safety of corticosteroid injections and other injections for management of tendinopathy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2010 Nov 20;376(9754):1751-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61160-9. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
PMID: 20970844BACKGROUNDSilverstein B, Welp E, Nelson N, Kalat J. Claims incidence of work-related disorders of the upper extremities: Washington state, 1987 through 1995. Am J Public Health. 1998 Dec;88(12):1827-33. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.12.1827.
PMID: 9842381BACKGROUNDStovitz SD, Johnson RJ. NSAIDs and musculoskeletal treatment: what is the clinical evidence? Phys Sportsmed. 2003 Jan;31(1):35-52. doi: 10.3810/psm.2003.01.160.
PMID: 20086440BACKGROUNDCohen DB, Kawamura S, Ehteshami JR, Rodeo SA. Indomethacin and celecoxib impair rotator cuff tendon-to-bone healing. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):362-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546505280428. Epub 2005 Oct 6.
PMID: 16210573BACKGROUNDGaujoux-Viala C, Dougados M, Gossec L. Efficacy and safety of steroid injections for shoulder and elbow tendonitis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Dec;68(12):1843-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.099572. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
PMID: 19054817BACKGROUNDLewis JS. Rotator cuff tendinopathy/subacromial impingement syndrome: is it time for a new method of assessment? Br J Sports Med. 2009 Apr;43(4):259-64. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052183. Epub 2008 Oct 6.
PMID: 18838403BACKGROUNDMansat P, Cofield RH, Kersten TE, Rowland CM. Complications of rotator cuff repair. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997 Apr;28(2):205-13. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70280-7.
PMID: 9113716BACKGROUNDBrislin KJ, Field LD, Savoie FH 3rd. Complications after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2007 Feb;23(2):124-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.09.001.
PMID: 17276218BACKGROUNDLiu X, Luo F, Pan K, Wu W, Chen H. High glucose upregulates connective tissue growth factor expression in human vascular smooth muscle cells. BMC Cell Biol. 2007 Jan 16;8:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-8-1.
PMID: 17224075BACKGROUNDFullerton BD. High-resolution ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging to document tissue repair after prolotherapy: a report of 3 cases. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Feb;89(2):377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.017.
PMID: 18226666BACKGROUNDK. Dean Reeves, MD; Bradley D. Fullerton, MD, FAAPMR and Gaston Topol, MD Evidence-Based Regenerative Injection Therapy (Prolotherapy)in Sports Medicine sports Medicine Resource Manual 2008 Chapter 50.
BACKGROUNDScarpone M, Rabago DP, Zgierska A, Arbogast G, Snell E. The efficacy of prolotherapy for lateral epicondylosis: a pilot study. Clin J Sport Med. 2008 May;18(3):248-54. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318170fc87.
PMID: 18469566BACKGROUNDReeves KD, Hassanein K. Randomized prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study of dextrose prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis with or without ACL laxity. Altern Ther Health Med. 2000 Mar;6(2):68-74, 77-80.
PMID: 10710805BACKGROUNDReeves KD, Hassanein K. Randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled double-blind study of dextrose prolotherapy for osteoarthritic thumb and finger (DIP, PIP, and trapeziometacarpal) joints: evidence of clinical efficacy. J Altern Complement Med. 2000 Aug;6(4):311-20. doi: 10.1089/10755530050120673.
PMID: 10976977BACKGROUNDDavid Rabago Prolotherapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain Complementary and alternative therapies in the aging population edited by Ronald Ross Watson chapter 2 15-44 Elsevier 2009
BACKGROUNDBertrand H, Reeves KD, Bennett CJ, Bicknell S, Cheng AL. Dextrose Prolotherapy Versus Control Injections in Painful Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jan;97(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.412. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
PMID: 26301385RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Helene Bertrand, M.D., CCFP, LM
- Organization
- University of British Columbia Department of family practice
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helene Bertrand, MD, CCFP
University of British Columbia, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- For the 25% dextrose and .1% lidocaine and the .1% lidocaine enthesis injections, only the pharmacist knew the contents of each participant's numbered bottle. For the .1% subcutaneous injections, both the pharmacist and the physician where aware of the contents. There was a small c on the label. Only one participant asked the meaning of this letter, and he was told it stood for "contents".
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D., C.M, CCFP
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2011
First Posted
July 26, 2011
Study Start
November 1, 2010
Primary Completion
June 1, 2013
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
August 14, 2018
Results First Posted
August 14, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- The data will be available from January 2015 to January 2020
- Access Criteria
- This study was published in Archives Of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation 2016 volume 97 pages 17 - 25 under the title: Dextrose Prolotherapy Versus Control Injections In Painful Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
The de-identified database Is now available on request to Doctor Helene Bertrand at heleneb@mail.UBC.ca