Nursing Home Pain Management Algorithm Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
396
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain assessment and management deficiencies in nursing homes (NHs) are well documented. Unrelieved pain in this setting results in poorer resident outcomes, including depression, decreased mobility, sleep disturbance, and impaired physical and social functioning. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate the efficacy of a pain management algorithm coupled with intense diffusion strategies in improving pain, physical function and depression among NH residents. Specific aims of the study are to: 1) Evaluate the effectiveness of a pain management algorithm (ALG) coupled with intense diffusion strategies, as compared with pain education (EDU) and weak diffusion strategies, in improving pain, mobility, and depression among NH residents; 2) Determine the extent to which adherence to the ALG and organizational factors are associated with changes in resident outcomes and the extent to which changes in these variables are associated with changes in outcomes; 3) Evaluate the persistence of changes in process and outcome variables at long-term follow-up and 4) Evaluate the relationships among behavioral problems and pain in severely cognitively impaired residents who are unable to provide self-report.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 pain
Started Sep 2006
Longer than P75 for phase_2 pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2006
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2011
CompletedJuly 22, 2011
July 1, 2011
3.2 years
June 23, 2011
July 21, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change from Baseline in Pain at 3 months
Brief Pain Inventory (self-reporting participants) Nursing Assistant Surrogate Report
3 months
Change from Baseline in Pain at 6 months
Brief Pain Inventory (self-reporting participants) Nursing Assistant Surrogate Report
6 months post intervention
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change from Baseline in Mobility at 3 months
3 months
Change from Baseline in Agitation at 6 months
6 months
Change from Baseline Adherence to Best Practices at 3 months
3 months
Change from Baseline in Depression at 3 months
3 months
Change from Baseline in Depression at 6 months
6 months post intervention
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Algorithm
EXPERIMENTALThe NH pain management algorithm is a series of decision-making tools that begins with regular, comprehensive pain assessment matched to residents' cognitive status and proceed through analgesic therapy appropriate to the character, severity, and pattern of pain. The algorithm is coupled with intense diffusion strategies (e.g., education, consultation, boosters) to increase adoption of these evidence-based practices
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl sites received staff education for pain assessment and management comprised of four one-hour classes
Interventions
The NH pain management algorithm is a series of decision-making tools that begin with regular, comprehensive pain assessment matched to residents' cognitive status and proceed through analgesic therapy appropriate to the character, severity, and pattern of pain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- long-term nursing home residents,
- years and older,
- with moderate or greater pain in the week prior to screening,
- residing in a participating facility,
- who consent to participate (or whose surrogate decisionmaker consents to participation)
You may not qualify if:
- short-term stay patients,
- persons less than 65 years,
- residents on hospice
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98014, United States
Related Publications (6)
Jablonski AM, DuPen AR, Ersek M. The use of algorithms in assessing and managing persistent pain in older adults. Am J Nurs. 2011 Mar;111(3):34-43; quiz 44-5. doi: 10.1097/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000395239.60981.2f.
PMID: 21346465BACKGROUNDErsek M, Polissar N, Neradilek MB. Development of a composite pain measure for persons with advanced dementia: exploratory analyses in self-reporting nursing home residents. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Mar;41(3):566-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
PMID: 21094018BACKGROUNDErsek M, Herr K, Neradilek MB, Buck HG, Black B. Comparing the psychometric properties of the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Behaviors (CNPI) and the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAIN-AD) instruments. Pain Med. 2010 Mar;11(3):395-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00787.x. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
PMID: 20088854RESULTJablonski A, Ersek M. Nursing home staff adherence to evidence-based pain management practices. J Gerontol Nurs. 2009 Jul;35(7):28-34; quiz 36-7. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20090428-03.
PMID: 19650621RESULTErsek M, Neradilek MB, Herr K, Jablonski A, Polissar N, Du Pen A. Pain Management Algorithms for Implementing Best Practices in Nursing Homes: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Apr 1;17(4):348-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
PMID: 26897592DERIVEDErsek M, Polissar N, Pen AD, Jablonski A, Herr K, Neradilek MB. Addressing methodological challenges in implementing the nursing home pain management algorithm randomized controlled trial. Clin Trials. 2012 Oct;9(5):634-44. doi: 10.1177/1740774512454243. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
PMID: 22879574DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mary Ersek, PhD
University of Pennsylvania
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2011
First Posted
July 22, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2006
Primary Completion
November 1, 2009
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
July 22, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-07