Efficacy of Certican® in Combination With Myfortic® in Renal
HUSJ1
Efficacy and Safety of Certican® in Combination With Myfortic® in Adult Renal Allograft Recipients Following Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal at Week 16 Compared to Patients Who Are Maintained on Tacrolimus and Myfortic®
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of everolimus plus Myfortic® plus corticosteroids following CNI withdrawal at week 16 compared to tacrolimus plus Myfortic® plus corticosteroids as measured by the change in calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) from baseline to month 12. The key secondary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority of biopsy-proved acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or loss to follow-up (composite endpoint) at month 12 in patients switched to everolimus plus Myfortic® plus corticosteroids following CNI withdrawal at Week 16 compared to patients maintained on tacrolimus plus Myfortic® plus corticosteroids. Patients will be submitted to monthly GFR determination but, for group comparison, only the GFR measured at month 12 and month 24 of renal transplantation will be used.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Aug 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 20, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedJuly 21, 2011
March 1, 2011
10 months
June 20, 2011
July 20, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Glomerular Filtration Rate
The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of everolimus plus Myfortic® plus corticosteroids following CNI withdrawal at week 16 compared to tacrolimus plus Myfortic® plus corticosteroids as measured by the change in calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate (cGFR) from baseline to month 12.
96 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Non-inferiority of biopsy-proved acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death
1 year after enrollment
Study Arms (2)
Certican, prednisona, EC-MPS
ACTIVE COMPARATORTwenty patients will be selected at 16 weeks of renal transplantation to convert a immunosuppression to certican,prednisone and myfortic. The allocation will be done randomly to provide similar epidemiological characteristics with respect to gender, age, renal function and co morbidities in the two groups. The informed consent will obtained after an interview involving the researcher and patient when the protocol will be explained.A protocol renal biopsy will be performed at the end of the study, 12 months after transplantation
Tacrolimus,Prednisona, EC-MPS
NO INTERVENTIONTwenty patients will be selected at 16 weeks of renal transplant to continue use EC-MPS,Tacrolimus and Prednisone. The allocation will be done randomly to provide similar epidemiological characteristics with respect to gender, age, renal function and co morbidities in the two groups. The informed consent will obtained after an interview involving the researcher and patient when the protocol will be explained.A protocol renal biopsy will be performed at the end of the study, 12 months after transplantation
Interventions
Patients' therapy will be replaced from tacrolimus-based to everolimus-based immunosuppression. Everolimus will be introduced on day 1 at dose of 2 mg/day (1mg bid), and then everolimus trough levels will be obtained from day 3 onwards until C0 reaches the target for three consecutive days. Through levels will be adjusted to achieve 6-10ng/ml. Thereafter, if the target level was reached, the measurement will be performed weekly for 4 weeks and every 2 weeks until 8 weeks after conversion.In parallel, the tacrolimus dose will be reduced by 50% on day 1 and another 25% on day 7. The Tacrolimus will be withdrawn on day 14 if the target levels of everolimus are obtained.EC-MPS will be unchanged until day 14 after conversion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women between 18-70 years old
- Receptors of a first living-donor kidney allograft
- Patients must have been on a tacrolimus+myfortic regimen for at least 2 weeks prior to randomization
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with evidence of any acute rejection following transplantation at the time of randomization
- GFR ≤ 35 ml/min
- Proteinuria \> 800 mg/day
- Recipients of multiple organ transplants
- Chronic hepatic failure
- Asymptomatic bacteriuria
- Creatinine ≥ 2mg/dL on CNI withdrawn time
- Proteinuria ≥ 1g/24h on CNI withdrawn time
- Presence of uncontrolled hypercholesterolemia (≥ 350 mg/dL, ≥ 9.1 mmol/L)
- Hypertriglyceridemia (≥ 500 mg/dL, ≥ 5.6 mmol/L)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitário São José
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30140-073, Brazil
Related Publications (10)
Pilmore HL, Dittmer ID. Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity: reduction in dose results in marked improvement in renal function in patients with coexisting chronic allograft nephropathy. Clin Transplant. 2002 Jun;16(3):191-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2002.01119.x.
PMID: 12010142BACKGROUNDMendez R, Gonwa T, Yang HC, Weinstein S, Jensik S, Steinberg S; Prograf Study Group. A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 1 year. Transplantation. 2005 Aug 15;80(3):303-9. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000167757.63922.42.
PMID: 16082323BACKGROUNDNankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL, O'Connell PJ, Allen RD, Chapman JR. The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 11;349(24):2326-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020009.
PMID: 14668458BACKGROUNDLorber MI, Mulgaonkar S, Butt KM, Elkhammas E, Mendez R, Rajagopalan PR, Kahan B, Sollinger H, Li Y, Cretin N, Tedesco H; B251 Study Group. Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in the prevention of rejection in de novo renal transplant recipients: a 3-year randomized, multicenter, phase III study. Transplantation. 2005 Jul 27;80(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000164352.65613.24.
PMID: 16041270BACKGROUNDJohnson RW. The clinical impact of nephrotoxicity in renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2000 Jun 27;69(12 Suppl):SS14-7. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200006271-00004. No abstract available.
PMID: 10910258BACKGROUNDGallon L, Perico N, Dimitrov BD, Winoto J, Remuzzi G, Leventhal J, Gaspari F, Kaufman D. Long-term renal allograft function on a tacrolimus-based, pred-free maintenance immunosuppression comparing sirolimus vs. MMF. Am J Transplant. 2006 Jul;6(7):1617-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01340.x.
PMID: 16827862BACKGROUNDTedesco-Silva H Jr, Vitko S, Pascual J, Eris J, Magee JC, Whelchel J, Civati G, Campbell S, Alves-Filho G, Bourbigot B, Garcia VD, Leone J, Esmeraldo R, Rigotti P, Cambi V, Haas T; 2306 and 2307 study groups. 12-month safety and efficacy of everolimus with reduced exposure cyclosporine in de novo renal transplant recipients. Transpl Int. 2007 Jan;20(1):27-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00414.x.
PMID: 17181650BACKGROUNDCiancio G, Burke GW, Gaynor JJ, Mattiazzi A, Roth D, Kupin W, Nicolas M, Ruiz P, Rosen A, Miller J. A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year. Transplantation. 2004 Jan 27;77(2):244-51. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000101290.20629.DC.
PMID: 14742989BACKGROUNDCiancio G, Burke GW, Gaynor JJ, Ruiz P, Roth D, Kupin W, Rosen A, Miller J. A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimums/mycophenolate versus cyclosporine/sirolimus in renal transplantation: three-year analysis. Transplantation. 2006 Mar 27;81(6):845-52. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000203894.53714.27.
PMID: 16570006BACKGROUNDCiancio G, Burke GW, Gaynor JJ, Mattiazzi A, Roth D, Kupin W, Nicolas M, Ruiz P, Rosen A, Miller J. A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL)/sirolimus in renal transplantation. II. Survival, function, and protocol compliance at 1 year. Transplantation. 2004 Jan 27;77(2):252-8. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000101495.22734.07.
PMID: 14742990BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Euler P lasmar
Hospital Universitário Sao José
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2011
First Posted
July 21, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 21, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-03