Use of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Compared to Nasal Prong Oxygen or Humidified High Flow in Children Under Five With Severe Pneumonia and Hypoxaemia
Use of Bubble CPAP Compared to Nasal Prong Oxygen or Humidified High Flow in Children Under Five With Severe Pneumonia and Hypoxaemia: a Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
975
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is a common form of support for patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs) of industrialized countries with respiratory distress (1). Nasal CPAP (NCPAP) is effective in correcting hypoxemia and contributes to reducing the number of children requiring endo-tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (2). CPAP is most frequently delivered to neonates using conventional mechanical ventilators, and thus there is minimal or no cost saving. There are other ways of delivering CPAP, such as Bubble-CPAP, which requires a source of gas flow (typically 6-8 L/ minute in a neonate), an air-oxygen blender, a humidifier and a T-piece.(3). The expiratory arm is inserted in a bottle of water and the level of CPAP delivered is equivalent to the length of the expiratory tubing that remains under water. Robust equipment is now available at a fraction of the cost of mechanical ventilators. Bubble-CPAP has potential advantages over the mechanical ventilation, such as lower cost, ease of application by nursing staff, lower risk of complications, and has been proposed as an inexpensive method of delivering CPAP in developing countries (3). High flow air/oxygen mix is useful in reducing the indication of mechanical ventilation (4); however, there is a lack of randomized studies comparing it with bubble CPAP or with standard flow O2 supplementation by nasal prongs. High flow air/oxygen mix uses flows of 2 litre per kg per minute of blended air/oxygen mix, usually with a low fraction of inspired oxygen (say 25-40%). It is easy to apply, but requires additional equipment to standard oxygen therapy, and closer monitoring. "High flow" delivers uncertain levels of CPAP, so it is not clearly superior to bubble-CPAP, and there have been no controlled comparative trials of these two techniques. Pneumonia and malnutrition are two of the most common co-morbidities in children in developing countries (5). In hospitals in resource-poor settings, children with severe malnutrition and pneumonia often present with respiratory distress with or without severe hypoxaemia and impending respiratory failure (6). They initially receive O2 supplementation through nasal prong or face mask. Support from bubble CPAP might help to effectively treat hypoxaemia, improve respiratory function, avoid the need for mechanical ventilation and its complications, and reduce mortality. Almost half of the patients admitted in the intensive care unit of the Dhaka hospital of ICDDR,B present with hypoxaemia, many with impending respiratory failure. Children with pneumonia also invariably have severe malnutrition with or without diarrhoea (Chisti MJ, MMed thesis, unpublished data). They often need mechanical ventilation, with attendant costs, complications and high mortality rates. However, no published data are available about the use of bubble-CPAP in children with pneumonia and malnutrition and there have been no controlled trials of CPAP in developing countries. The Hypothesis is: In children with severe pneumonia and hypoxaemia the probability of treatment failure (see definition below) will be significantly lower when respiratory support is initially provided by bubble-CPAP or high-flow, humidified air/O2 mix by nasal prongs, compared to standard oxygen flow.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedJuly 28, 2015
June 1, 2015
3.9 years
July 6, 2011
July 26, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treatment failure
Severe hypoxaemia (SpO2\<85%) after being on one of the study arm treatments for \>1 hour Clinical signs of exhaustion, including active contraction of respiratory muscles with paradoxical abdominal and thoracic motion, gasping, severe chest wall in-drawing PCO2 \>80mm Hg and pH\<7.2 on capillary blood gas OR
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Mortality rate
24 months
Study Arms (3)
bubble CPAP
EXPERIMENTALChildren will receive bubble CPAP Bubble-CPAP, which requires a source of gas flow (typically 6-8 L/ minute in a neonate), an air-oxygen blender, a humidifier and a T-piece. The expiratory arm is inserted in a bottle of water and the level of CPAP delivered is equivalent to the length of the expiratory tubing that remains under water. Robust equipment is now available at a fraction of the cost of mechanical ventilators. Bubble-CPAP has potential advantages over the mechanical ventilation, such as lower cost, ease of application by nursing staff, lower risk of complications, and has been proposed as an inexpensive method of delivering CPAP in developing countries.
High flow air/ oxygen mix
EXPERIMENTALHigh flow air/ oxygen mix is useful in reducing the indication of mechanical ventilation (4); however, there is a lack of randomized studies comparing it with bubble CPAP or with standard flow O2 supplementation by nasal prongs. High flow air/oxygen mix uses flows of 2 litre per kg per minute of blended air / oxygen mix, usually with a low fraction of inspired oxygen (say 25-40%).
Standard O2 supplementation by nasal prongs
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard O2 supplementation by nasal prongs @ 0.5-2.0 litre per minute
Interventions
All children will be monitored for by pulse oximetry for arterial O2 saturation, respiratory rate, lower chest wall in-drawing, intercostal retraction, head nodding, cyanosis, tracheal tug, heart failure (defined by the presence of tachypnea, tachycardia, gallop rhythm, hepatomegaly, pedal oedema, basal crackles). Arterial or capillary blood gas analyses will be done for children failing to maintain saturation (\>90% with allocated treatment), or if there is concern about hypercarbia or acidosis.
Humidified high flow air / O2 mix at 2 l/kg/min through nasal canula. All children will be monitored for by pulse oximetry for arterial O2 saturation, respiratory rate, lower chest wall in-drawing, intercostal retraction, head nodding, cyanosis, tracheal tug, heart failure (defined by the presence of tachypnea, tachycardia, gallop rhythm, hepatomegaly, pedal oedema, basal crackles). Arterial or capillary blood gas analyses will be done for children failing to maintain saturation (\>90% with allocated treatment), or if there is concern about hypercarbia or acidosis.
Standard O2 supplementation will be given by nasal cannula at 0.5 - 2 l/min. All children will be monitored for by pulse oximetry for arterial O2 saturation, respiratory rate, lower chest wall in-drawing, intercostal retraction, head nodding, cyanosis, tracheal tug, heart failure (defined by the presence of tachypnea, tachycardia, gallop rhythm, hepatomegaly, pedal oedema, basal crackles). Arterial or capillary blood gas analyses will be done for children failing to maintain saturation (\>90% with allocated treatment), or if there is concern about hypercarbia or acidosis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children of either sex, aged 0-4 years, with severe/very severe pneumonia (per WHO guidelines) and hypoxaemia (SpO2 \< 90%) will be included in our study in the ARI Unit of the Longer Stay Ward (LSW), High Dependency Unit HDU, and ICU unit of Dhaka Hospital of ICDDR,B.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladeshlead
- AusAIDcollaborator
- University of Melbournecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Dhaka Hospital, ICDDR,B
Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh
Related Publications (1)
Chisti MJ, Salam MA, Smith JH, Ahmed T, Pietroni MA, Shahunja KM, Shahid AS, Faruque AS, Ashraf H, Bardhan PK, Sharifuzzaman, Graham SM, Duke T. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure for children with severe pneumonia and hypoxaemia in Bangladesh: an open, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Sep 12;386(9998):1057-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60249-5. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
PMID: 26296950DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2011
First Posted
July 19, 2011
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 28, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-06