Validation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Romanian Version of Oral Health Impact Profile in Edentulous Adults
ROM-OHIP-ED
Patient Satisfaction With the Use of Three Different Systems as Retention for Implant Supported Mandibular Overdentures.
2 other identifiers
interventional
69
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is:
- 1.To validate the Romanian translation of OHIP-EDENT (Oral Health Impact Profile in Edentulous Adults), the short form of OHIP (Oral Health Impact Profile) developed by Allen and Locker for edentulous adults. The OHIP questionnaire is an efficient instrument for assessment of OHRQoL - Oral Health-Related Quality of Life.
- 2.To compare satisfaction of 69 fully mandibular edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported overdentures with three different types of retention: Retentive Anchors, Magnets, Locator.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2004
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedFebruary 4, 2015
February 1, 2015
6.3 years
July 11, 2011
February 2, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
OHIP-EDENT linguistic and cultural adaptation in Romanian
Steps for validation: * linguistic and cultural adaptation of the original instrument to Romanian; * pilot study to assess face and content validity; * main study to assess the reliability and construct validity. OHIP-EDENT questionnaire includes 19-items addressing masticatory capacity, pleasure of eating, level of comfort, and relationship among others while wearing the prosthesis and detects the impact of oral health in the quality of life of edentulous adults wearing total prosthesis. Response categories:4=very often; 3=fairly often; 2=occasionally; 1=hardly ever; 0=never/don't know.
Two-weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of patient satisfaction with the use of three different systems as retention for implant supported mandibular overdentures.
5 years
Study Arms (3)
Retentive Anchor Group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR23 fully edentulous patients will receive Retentive Anchors (Institute Straumann AG, Basel Switzerland)as retention system for the two implant overdenture.
Magnet Group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR23 fully edentulous patients will receive Magnets (Institute Straumann AG, Basel Switzerland)as retention system for the two implant overdenture.
Locator Group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR23 fully edentulous patients will receive Locator (Institute Straumann AG, Basel Switzerland)as retention system for the two implant overdenture.
Interventions
Each patient (of the 69 recruited) will receive 2 screw-type Straumann (Institute Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) standard implants Ø4.1 mm, with SLA surface in the canine region of the mandible with an interconnecting line approaching parallelism with the terminal mandibular hinge axis, in a 1-stage non-submerged procedure according to a strict protocol (Weingart D and ten Bruggenkate 2000).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Fully mandibular edentulous patients
- Complains about the stability of the existing mandibular denture satisfactory from a technical point of view.
- Acceptance of a mandibular over-denture retained by two endosseous implants.
- Patients agree to a 5-year follow-up period.
You may not qualify if:
- Insufficient bone volume (height and with) for inserting at least a 10 mm implant (Ø 4,1).
- Angle class II relationship.
- Physical severe consideration that will affect the minimal invasive surgical procedure or constitute a hindrance for a 5-year follow-up.
- History of radiotherapy in the head and neck region.
- History of pre-prosthetic surgery (including bone graft procedures) or previous oral implants.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Concordia Dent Clinic
Bucharest, 041335, Romania
Related Publications (7)
Zani SR, Rivaldo EG, Frasca LC, Caye LF. Oral health impact profile and prosthetic condition in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported overdentures and fixed prostheses. J Oral Sci. 2009 Dec;51(4):535-43. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.51.535.
PMID: 20032605BACKGROUNDBeaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available.
PMID: 11124735BACKGROUNDAssad AS, Abd El-Dayem MA, Badawy MM. Comparison between mainly mucosa-supported and combined mucosa-implant-supported mandibular overdentures. Implant Dent. 2004 Dec;13(4):386-94. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000144512.43654.08.
PMID: 15592001BACKGROUNDWeingart D, ten Bruggenkate CM. Treatment of fully edentulous patients with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:69-82. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1069.x.
PMID: 11168258BACKGROUNDChan MF, Johnston C, Howell RA, Cawood JI. Prosthetic management of the atrophic mandible using endosseous implants and overdentures: a six year review. Br Dent J. 1995 Nov 11;179(9):329-37. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808917.
PMID: 7495628BACKGROUNDDavis DM, Packer ME. Mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants with either ball attachments or magnets: 5-year results. Int J Prosthodont. 1999 May-Jun;12(3):222-9.
PMID: 10635189BACKGROUNDNaert I, Alsaadi G, Quirynen M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Jul-Aug;17(4):401-10.
PMID: 15382775BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
CORINA MARILENA I CRISTACHE, DMD, PhD
CONCORDIA DENT CLINIC
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr Corina Marilena Cristache, DMD, PhD, senior lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2011
First Posted
July 12, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2004
Primary Completion
September 1, 2010
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 4, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02