Trial Comparing Electric and Harmonic Scalpel in Mastectomy
Harmonic
Prospective Trial Comparing the Use of Conventional Electric Scalpel and Harmonic Scalpel in Mastectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
97
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Prospective trial comparing post-operative complications and seroma formation after mastectomy in patients with breast cancer, using conventional electric scalpel and harmonic scalpel.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jan 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2011
CompletedMarch 7, 2014
March 1, 2014
10 months
June 24, 2011
March 6, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Differences in operative conditions and first week seroma drainage
Time of the surgery and blood loss volume during surgery. Drain volume postoperative in the first week
1 week.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Differences in local complication
day 7 and day 14
Study Arms (2)
Electric Scalpel Mastectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORRadical mastectomy with electric scalpel
Harmonic scalpel mastectomy
EXPERIMENTALRadical Mastectomy with harmonic scalpel
Interventions
Radical mastectomy with electric scalpel. Electric scalpels were calibrated at 40 watts of cutting and coagulation power.
Radical mastectomy with harmonic scalpel. Harmonic GEN04 generator calibrated at power leve 3 and 5, using the HP054 handpiece and HF 105 curved blade
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Breast carcinoma (ductal or lobular)
- Modified radical mastectomy was the surgery to be realized
You may not qualify if:
- Blood dyscrasia, collagen diseases, known uncontrolled chronic diseases, infections (mammary or axillary), ulcerated tumors and pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos.
Barretos, São Paulo, 14.784.400, Brazil
Related Publications (9)
Lumachi F, Brandes AA, Burelli P, Basso SM, Iacobone M, Ermani M. Seroma prevention following axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer by using ultrasound scissors: a prospective clinical study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004 Jun;30(5):526-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.03.003.
PMID: 15135481BACKGROUNDLumachi F, Burelli P, Basso SM, Iacobone M, Ermani M. Usefulness of ultrasound scissors in reducing serous drainage after axillary dissection for breast cancer: a prospective randomized clinical study. Am Surg. 2004 Jan;70(1):80-4.
PMID: 14964555BACKGROUNDKozomara D, Galic G, Brekalo Z, Sutalo N, Kvesic A, Soljic M. A randomised two-way comparison of mastectomy performed using harmonic scalpel or monopolar diathermy. Coll Antropol. 2010 Mar;34 Suppl 1:105-12.
PMID: 20402305BACKGROUNDKurtz SB, Frost DB. A comparison of two surgical techniques for performing mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1995 Apr;21(2):143-5. doi: 10.1016/s0748-7983(95)90171-x.
PMID: 7720886BACKGROUNDDeo SV, Shukla NK, Asthana S, Niranjan B, Srinivas G. A comparative study of modified radical mastectomy using harmonic scalpel and electrocautery. Singapore Med J. 2002 May;43(5):226-8.
PMID: 12188072BACKGROUNDGalatius H, Okholm M, Hoffmann J. Mastectomy using ultrasonic dissection: effect on seroma formation. Breast. 2003 Oct;12(5):338-41. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9776(03)00110-3.
PMID: 14659149BACKGROUNDAdwani A, Ebbs SR. Ultracision reduces acute blood loss but not seroma formation after mastectomy and axillary dissection: a pilot study. Int J Clin Pract. 2006 May;60(5):562-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.00689.x.
PMID: 16700855BACKGROUNDMiller E, Paull DE, Morrissey K, Cortese A, Nowak E. Scalpel versus electrocautery in modified radical mastectomy. Am Surg. 1988 May;54(5):284-6.
PMID: 3364865BACKGROUNDRibeiro GH, Kerr LM, Haikel RL, Peres SV, Matthes AG, Depieri Michelli RA, Bailao A Jr, Fregnani JH, Vieira RA. Modified radical mastectomy: a pilot clinical trial comparing the use of conventional electric scalpel and harmonic scalpel. Int J Surg. 2013;11(6):496-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
PMID: 23579255DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Edmundo C Mauad, MD, PhD
Director from Barretos Cancer Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2011
First Posted
July 12, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
November 1, 2008
Study Completion
November 1, 2008
Last Updated
March 7, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-03