NCT01391000

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the most effective method between Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation and Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation therapy carbon dioxide therapy for pain control in the post-surgical rehabilitation of patients treated with reconstruction of the rotator cuff.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2011

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 15, 2011

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2011

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 11, 2011

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2013

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2013

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 2, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

February 13, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

June 15, 2011

Results QC Date

February 3, 2017

Last Update Submit

January 16, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

rotator cuff surgerypainexercise therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual Analogue Scale Mean Score

    To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation carbon dioxide therapy vs Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator during the first cycle of rehabilitation through Visual Analogue Scale, calculating the mean score in values of beginning and end of daily treatment. The scale had values from 0 to 10 where zero represented no pain and 10 the worst possible pain. More than 3 means pain.

    Change from baseline in pain at the end of the rehabilitation cycle (two weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Constant Murley Score for Range of Motion and Shoulder Function Assessment.

    Change from baseline in range of motion at the end of the rehabilitation cycle (two weeks)

  • Short Form 12-PCS for Quality of Life Assessment

    Change from baseline in quality of life at the end of the rehabilitation cycle (two weeks)

Study Arms (2)

Laser CO2

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: LASER CO2

TENS

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: TENS

Interventions

LASER CO2PROCEDURE

The therapy is performed with the patient sitting, place the unit high above the shoulder with the following indicators: through a pulsed 40 Hz, distance between device and patient 60 cm, 10x15 cm area of application, power 2W; energy between 10 and 15 J/cm2

Laser CO2
TENSPROCEDURE

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Application of Stimulation occurs through the use of No. 3 channels (long head of biceps area (CLB), the supraspinatus muscle area, the area medial border of the scapula. Duration: Twenty (20) minutes, mpulsi: 70 microsec, frequency: 100 Hz, intensity: between 20 and 40 mA.

TENS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • subjects after surgery for rotator cuff injury of traumatic and / or degenerative

You may not qualify if:

  • concomitant fractures of the humerus, pace-maker, diseases for which treatments are contraindicated.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Bologna, Bo, 40136, Italy

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff InjuriesPain

Interventions

Lasers, GasTranscutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon InjuriesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

LasersOptical DevicesEquipment and SuppliesRadiation Equipment and SuppliesElectric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitationAnalgesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr Roberta Monesi
Organization
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Study Officials

  • Roberta Monesi, PT

    Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2011

First Posted

July 11, 2011

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion

April 1, 2013

Study Completion

November 1, 2013

Last Updated

February 13, 2018

Results First Posted

August 2, 2017

Record last verified: 2018-01

Locations