NCT01382654

Brief Summary

The objectives of this study were to:

  • Examine the tolerability of two formulations and two dose concentrations of epinastine.
  • Select formulation(s) of epinastine for future studies by evaluating the individual sensory attribute scores of the Nasal Spray Evaluation Questionnaire (NSEQ) collected after each study drug administration and the subject preference ranking assessed at the completion of the study.
  • Compare the preference of two formulations and two dose concentrations of epinastine compared to azelastine following a single dose of each in a randomized, double-blind, two-cohort, three-period crossover design.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
131

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2006

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2006

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2006

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2006

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 23, 2011

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 27, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

November 2, 2015

Status Verified

October 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

June 23, 2011

Last Update Submit

October 8, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Overall preference rank at the completion of the study using the Overall Nasal Spray Evaluation Questionnaire (NSEQ)

    2 days

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Scores from each individual response from the NSEQ of all administered formulations (two formulations and two concentrations of epinastine and azelastine).

    2 days

Study Arms (5)

epinastine 0.1%

EXPERIMENTAL

nasal spray 2 sprays to each nostril for a total of 3 doses

Drug: epinastine 0.1%

epinastine 0.1% with taste masking agent

EXPERIMENTAL

nasal spray 2 sprays to each nostril for a total of 3 doses

Drug: epinastine 0.1% with taste masking agent

epinastine 0.2%

EXPERIMENTAL

nasal spray 2 sprays to each nostril for a total of 3 doses

Drug: epinastine 0.2%

epinastine 0.2% with taste masking agent

EXPERIMENTAL

nasal spray 2 sprays to each nostril for a total of 3 doses

Drug: epinastine 0.2% with taste masking agent

azelastine 0.1%

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

nasal spray 2 sprays in each nostril for a total of 3 doses

Drug: azelastine 0.1%

Interventions

nasal spray 2 sprays to each nostril for a total of 3 doses

epinastine 0.1%

nasal spray 2 sprays to each nostril for a total for a 3 doses

epinastine 0.1% with taste masking agent

nasal spray 2 sprays to each nostril for a total of 3 doses

epinastine 0.2%

nasal spray 2 sprays to each nostril for a total of 3 doses

epinastine 0.2% with taste masking agent

nasal spray 2 sprays to each nostril for a total of 3 doses

azelastine 0.1%

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • between ages 18-70
  • history of SAR or PAR for 1 year
  • mild symptoms

You may not qualify if:

  • asthma or RAD
  • respiratory tract infection within 14 days prior to screening

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rhinitis, Allergic

Interventions

epinastine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RhinitisNose DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2011

First Posted

June 27, 2011

Study Start

September 1, 2006

Primary Completion

October 1, 2006

Study Completion

October 1, 2006

Last Updated

November 2, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-10