Effects of Internet-based Treatment of Pathological Gambling
Prediction and Treatment Outcome of Internet-based Treatment of Pathological Gambling With Three-year Follow-up
1 other identifier
interventional
284
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A trial testing the outcome of an Internet-based treatment of pathological gambling with the hypothesis that there will be improvements both immediately and up to 36 months. It is also hypnotized that treatment response can be predicted from background variables.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2004
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2011
CompletedJune 30, 2011
January 1, 2004
1.7 years
June 22, 2011
June 29, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The National Opinion Research Center DSM Screen for Gambling Problems (NODS)
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
1 week
Quality of Life Inventory
Present moment
Study Arms (1)
Treatment
EXPERIMENTALThe treatment was based on established cognitive behavior therapy methods, as described in self-help books (Hodgins, 2002; Ladouceur \& Lachance, 2006). The text was divided into eight modules and was adapted for Internet use. The first four modules had a motivational interviewing focus and included building motivation for change by letting the participant answer open-ended questions that would evoke talk of change. The participants were encouraged to ask for input from their relatives on different aspects of their gambling. In addition, the first four modules included time line follow-back and mapping of the reasons for gambling. The remaining four modules were based on CBT. Each module included information and exercises and ended with three to eight essay-style questions. Feedback on homework assignments was usually given within 24 hr after participants had sent their answers via e-mail. Once weekly, a telephone call was made by the therapists to each participant.
Interventions
The treatment was based on established cognitive behavior therapy methods, as described in self-help books (Hodgins, 2002; Ladouceur \& Lachance, 2006). The text was divided into eight modules and was adapted for Internet use. The first four modules had a motivational interviewing focus and included building motivation for change by letting the participant answer open-ended questions that would evoke talk of change. The participants were encouraged to ask for input from their relatives on different aspects of their gambling. In addition, the first four modules included time line follow-back and mapping of the reasons for gambling. The remaining four modules were based on CBT. Each module included information and exercises and ended with three to eight essay-style questions. Feedback on homework assignments was usually given within 24 hr after participants had sent their answers via e-mail. Once weekly, a telephone call was made by the therapists to each participant.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pathological gambling according to DSM and having gambled at least once the past month
- Being atleast 18 years old
- Living in Sweden
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Umeå Universitylead
- Uppsala Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University
Umeå, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Per Carlbring, PhD
Umeå University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2011
First Posted
June 27, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2004
Primary Completion
January 1, 2006
Study Completion
January 1, 2009
Last Updated
June 30, 2011
Record last verified: 2004-01