Male Stress Urinary Incontinence and Sexual Health
2 other identifiers
observational
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study if to demonstrate if post-prostatectomy incontinence is a barrier to sexual satisfaction/frequency/desire and if surgical correction of incontinence will improve these aspects of sexual health.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Oct 2011
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedJuly 22, 2016
July 1, 2016
2 months
June 21, 2011
July 20, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Whether stress urinary incontinence is a barrier to sexual satisfaction/frequency/desire
1 year
Whether surgical correction of stress urinary incontinence will improve these aspects of sexual health
1 year
Interventions
Standard of care
Eligibility Criteria
Post-prostatectomy patients at least 6 months after either open radical retropubic prostatectomy or robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with bothersome stress urinary incontinence will be initially screened with urodynamics, a 24 hour pad test, and a self questionnaire to assess how bothersome their incontinence is.
You may qualify if:
- Adult men age 18-80 who have had an open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy more than 6 months ago who have bothersome urinary incontinence.
You may not qualify if:
- Any significant cardiac or pulmonary co-morbidities that would preclude the patient from another surgical procedure as they would be too high risk for general anesthesia.
- They will also be excluded if based on their anatomy or urodynamics, they will most likely not benefit from a surgical incontinence procedure (e.g. poor bladder contractility, bladder neck contracture, etc).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Craig Vance Comiter
Stanford University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2011
First Posted
June 23, 2011
Study Start
October 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
July 22, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07