Clinical Trial of Hysteroscopy in Postmenopausal Women to Compare Techniques
Phase 1 Study of Two Techniques in Hysteroscopy That Compare Carbon Dioxide Versus Saline Solution
Phase 1 Study of Two Techniques in Hysteroscopy That Compare Carbon Dioxide Versus Saline Solution
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Study Start
March 2011
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
March 2011
Actual (reported)Study Completion
Not reported
Date not reportedNowadays,hysteroscopy is a golden standard procedure to describe the morphology of uterine cavity and investigate of abnormal uterine bleeding . The success of the procedure is based on the distension of the cavity . It can cause pain and discomfort and sometimes the procedure fails. . There are two techniques to make the procedure , one with gas and the other with saline solution. Objective: to compare two techniques concerning pain , procedure duration and image quality
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
Not reported
Date not reportedClick on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
March 2011
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
March 2011
Actual (reported)June 16, 2011
Actual (reported)June 20, 2011
Actual (reported)Evaluation of the comfort in office hysteroscopy
140 women will undergo office hysteroscopy to evaluate pain, time of the procedure and image quality using two techniques one with gas and the other with saline solution.
one year
office hysteroscopy with gas or saline solution
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Departamento de Tocoginecologia FCM UNICAMP
Campinas, São Paulo, 13083881, Brazil
Valter Fausto Santos
University of Campinas, Brazil
First Submitted
June 16, 2011
First Posted
June 20, 2011
Study Start
March 2011
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
March 2011
Actual (reported)Comparison Between the Intrauterine Lidocaine and Warm Saline Distention Medium for Pain Relief During Office Hysteroscopy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Last Updated
June 20, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-06
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: