Dual Task Practice in Parkinson's Disease
Duality-PD
Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease: a Randomized Comparison of Integrated Versus Consecutive Dual Task Training
2 other identifiers
interventional
121
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The ability to perform two or more tasks together is impaired in Parkinson's Disease (PD). Based on pilot work we hypothesize that dual tasking is amenable to training in PD and will not compromise safety. In the proposed study we will therefore collect high level evidence on whether 6 weeks of integrated dual task gait training is more effective than consecutive task practice. The investigators will use a randomized, single blind study design and conduct the same protocols in two academic centers (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen). The investigators intend to test an experimental condition which consists of focused dual task training in the home using a novel program of personalized cognitive tasks. The aim of dual task training is to teach motor-cognitive task integration and achieve optimal levels of automaticity and functionality. The control arm will receive gait practice and separate cognitive training of the same intensity, but offered consecutively. We will test the hypothesis that dual task training (integration) will have more pronounced effects on complex gait than consecutive task training. Sub-analysis will be conducted on patients with and without freezing of gait. The investigators expect that integrated dual task training may be less effective in patients with freezing, due to the increased fall risk and impaired cognitive profiles. Overall, this project will provide evidence to support future directions for motor learning and innovative rehabilitation targets.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jun 2011
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedNovember 2, 2015
October 1, 2015
4.3 years
June 15, 2011
October 30, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Gait speed during dual task conditions (untrained Auditory Stroop task, trained Digit Span)
Change scores will be calculated, comparing the change over the two baseline timepoints with the change after 6 week intervention. The change between the first baseline timepoint and the last timepoint (24 weeks) will also be compared.
24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Functional Dual task, single task gait measures, cognitive outcomes, Freezing of Gait Questionnaire, Quality of life scores (PDQ39)
24 weeks
Fall rate as determined by weekly phonecall
24 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Integrated dual task training
EXPERIMENTALIntegrated dual task training delivered by a physiotherapist. In this training mode walking practice will be combined with simultaneously carrying out cognitive discrimination, verbal fluency and memory tasks.
Consecutive task training
ACTIVE COMPARATORConsecutive task gait training delivered by a physical therapist. In this training mode, walking practice will be conducted separately, focusing on the motor task only. Training of cognitive discrimination, verbal fluency and memory tasks will be done consecutively while the subjects are sitting.
Interventions
Physical therapy consisting of gait training 3 times a week for 6 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hoehn \& Yahr stage II-III in the on-phase
- Able to walk for 10 minutes continuously
- Dual task interference of at least 5% using a cognitive secondary task
- Without cognitive impairment (MMSE \> 24)
- On stable medication
- Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease made by a movement disorders specialist
You may not qualify if:
- Deep Brain stimulation
- Living alone
- Severe medical conditions affecting gait
- Hearing problems
- Likely to change medication regimen.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- KU Leuvenlead
- University Medical Center Nijmegencollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, B-3001, Belgium
Related Publications (2)
Strouwen C, Molenaar EA, Keus SH, Munks L, Bloem BR, Nieuwboer A. Test-Retest Reliability of Dual-Task Outcome Measures in People With Parkinson Disease. Phys Ther. 2016 Aug;96(8):1276-86. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150244. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
PMID: 26847010DERIVEDStrouwen C, Molenaar EA, Keus SH, Munks L, Munneke M, Vandenberghe W, Bloem BR, Nieuwboer A. Protocol for a randomized comparison of integrated versus consecutive dual task practice in Parkinson's disease: the DUALITY trial. BMC Neurol. 2014 Mar 27;14:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-61.
PMID: 24674594DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alice M Nieuwboer, PhD
KU Leuven
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2011
First Posted
June 17, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
October 1, 2015
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
November 2, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10