NCT01375231

Brief Summary

The investigators posit that it would be advantageous to reproduce the height of the entire patellofemoral joint in order to maintain the lever arm of the quadriceps mechanism at its preoperative level. Failure to do this may cause the quadriceps mechanism to be inefficient. For example the quadriceps mechanism would have to work harder if the total patellofemoral (PF) height is diminished. Alternatively, diminished motion or increased patellar strain may occur if the overall PF height is increased. The investigators theorize that either of these sizing errors could lead to anterior knee pain. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes between two surgical techniques: 1) a technique of reproducing the total PF joint on both sides of the articulation (Group 1) and 2) the traditional technique of reproducing only the patellar thickness on one side of the joint (Group 2).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2011

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 15, 2011

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 17, 2011

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

June 30, 2014

Status Verified

June 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

June 15, 2011

Last Update Submit

June 26, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Anterior knee Pain

    Measured by visual analog scale

    1 year postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    1 year postoperative

  • Range of Motion of knee

    1 year postoperative

Study Arms (2)

Measured Resection of patellofemoral joint

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The goal is to remove an amount of bone from the patella so that when reconstructed, the composite thickness of the entire prosthetic patellofemoral joint is recreated

Procedure: Measured Resection of patellofemoral joint

Measured resection of patella

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The thickness of the anterior condyle is not considered in this measurement. The goal is to restore the composite thickness of the patella only.

Procedure: Measured resection of patella

Interventions

The goal is to remove an amount of bone from the patella so that when reconstructed, the composite thickness of the entire prosthetic patellofemoral joint is recreated

Measured Resection of patellofemoral joint

The thickness of the anterior condyle is not considered in this measurement. The goal is to restore the composite thickness of the patella only.

Measured resection of patella

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients presenting for a primary total knee replacement who have failed conservative medical management.
  • Total knee replacement includes patella resurfacing.
  • Patient is willing and able to understand, sign, and date the study specific patient informed consent, to volunteer participation in the study.
  • Patient is psychosocially, mentally, and physically able to comply with the requirements of the study including post-op clinical evaluations and completion of questionnaires.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients presenting for a unicompartmental knee replacement.
  • Patients presenting for a revision total knee replacement.
  • Total knee replacement does not include patella resurfacing.
  • Patients with angular deformity greater than 15 degrees.
  • Patients with subluxation/dislocation of the patella.
  • Patients with severe patellar bone loss.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

OrthoCarolina Research Institute/OrthoCarolina

Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • Thomas Fehring, MD

    OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2011

First Posted

June 17, 2011

Study Start

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion

May 1, 2013

Study Completion

May 1, 2013

Last Updated

June 30, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-06

Locations