NCT01371838

Brief Summary

This purpose of this study is to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Ceftaroline Versus Intravenous Ceftriaxone in the Treatment of Adult Hospitalised Patients With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia in Asia.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
848

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2011

Geographic Reach
5 countries

43 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 27, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 13, 2011

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2011

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2013

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 23, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

September 6, 2017

Status Verified

September 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

April 27, 2011

Results QC Date

May 28, 2014

Last Update Submit

September 1, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical Cure Rate for Ceftaroline Compared to That for Ceftriaxone at Test of Cure (TOC) in CE Population

    Cure:Total resolution of all signs and symptoms of pneumonia (ie,CABP), or improvement to such an extent that further antimicrobial therapy was not necessary Failure: Any of the following: •Persistence, incomplete clinical resolution, or worsening in signs and symptoms of CABP that required alternative antimicrobial therapy •Treatment-limiting AE leading to discontinuation of study drug therapy, when subject required alternative antimicrobial therapy to treat the pneumonia •Death wherein pneumonia (ie,CABP) was considered causative Indeterminate: Inability to determine an outcome

    7-20 days after last dose of study drug

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in MITT Population

    Last day of study drug administration

  • Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) Visit in CE Population

    Last day of study drug administration

  • Clinical Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in MITT Population

    7-20 days after last day of study drug administration

  • Clinical Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in mMITT Population

    7-20 days after last day of study drug administration

  • Clinical Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in ME Population

    7-20 days after last day of study drug administration

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Ceftaroline

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: Ceftaroline

Ceftriaxone plus placebo

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Ceftriaxone

Interventions

Two consecutive infusions q12h for 5 to 7 days

Ceftaroline

One dose infusion followed by IV saline placebo infused q24h for 5 to 7 days plus two consecutive saline placebo infusion q24h.

Ceftriaxone plus placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 150 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Males and females 18 or more years of age
  • Lung Infection of Individual not Recently Hospitalized meeting the following criteria: Radiographically-confirmed pneumonia (new or progressive infection site of the lungs) consistent with bacterial pneumonia), AND Acute illness (≤ 7 days duration) with at least three of the following clinical signs or symptoms consistent with lung infection: New or increased cough, Purulent sputum or change in sputum character, Auscultatory findings consistent with pneumonia, Difficulty in breathing, short breath, or decreased partial pressure of oxygen in blood, Fever greater than 38ºC oral or body temperature lower than that required for normal body function(\< 35ºC), White blood cell count greater than or less than the normal, Greater than 15% immature neutrophils (bands) irrespective of white blood cell count, AND Moderate lung infection
  • The subject must require initial hospitalization, or treatment in an emergency room or urgent care setting, by the standard of care
  • The subject's infection would require initial treatment with intravenous antimicrobials
  • Female subjects of child-bearing potential, and those who are fewer than 2 years post-menopausal, must agree to, and comply with, using highly effective methods of birth control while participating in this study

You may not qualify if:

  • Lung Infection of Individual not Recently Hospitalized suitable for outpatient therapy with an oral antimicrobial agent
  • Confirmed or suspected respiratory tract infections attributable to sources other than bacteria from the individuals not recently hospitalized(e.g., ventilator-associated pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia, visible/gross aspiration pneumonia, suspected viral, fungal, or mycobacterial infection of the lung)
  • Non-infectious causes of lung lesion (e.g., pulmonary embolism, chemical pneumonitis from aspiration, hypersensitivity pneumonia, congestive heart failure)
  • Accumulation of pus in the pleural cavity
  • Microbiologically-documented infection with a pathogen known to be resistant to ceftriaxone, or epidemiological or clinical context suggesting high likelihood of a ceftriaxone-resistant "typical" bacterial pathogen.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (43)

Research Site

Beijing, China

Location

Research Site

Chengdu, China

Location

Research Site

Guangzhou, China

Location

Research Site

Haikou, China

Location

Research Site

Hangzhou, China

Location

Research Site

Hefei, China

Location

Research Site

Jiangyin, China

Location

Research Site

Nanchang, China

Location

Research Site

Shanghai, China

Location

Research Site

Shenyang, China

Location

Research Site

Shenzhen, China

Location

Research Site

Shijiazhuang, China

Location

Research Site

Wuxi, China

Location

Research Site

Bangalore, India

Location

Research Site

Calicut, India

Location

Research Site

Goa, India

Location

Research Site

Hyderabad, India

Location

Research Site

Jaipur, India

Location

Research Site

Lucknow, India

Location

Research Site

Ludhiana, India

Location

Research Site

Mysore, India

Location

Research Site

New Delhi, India

Location

Research Site

Trivandrum, India

Location

Research Site

Varanasi, India

Location

Research Site

Vellore, India

Location

Research Site

Anyang-si, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Bucheon-si, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Cheonan-si, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Chuncheon, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Daegu, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Daejeon, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Incheon, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Suwon, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Wŏnju, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Keelung, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Taichung, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Taipei, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Can Tho, Vietnam

Location

Research Site

Hanoi, Vietnam

Location

Research Site

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Location

Research Site

Hochiminh, Vietnam

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Zhuo C, Huang Y, Liu W, Xu JF, Zhu WY, Stone GG, Yan JL, Mohamed N. Efficacy and Safety of Ceftaroline Fosamil in Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia in China: Subset Analysis of an International Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial. Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Feb 23;15:605-617. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S342558. eCollection 2022.

  • Dryden M, Kantecki M, Yan JL, Stone GG, Leister-Tebbe H, Wilcox M. Treatment outcomes of secondary bacteraemia in patients treated with ceftaroline fosamil: pooled results from six phase III clinical trials. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Mar;28:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.10.027. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

  • Li J, Das S, Zhou D, Al-Huniti N. Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Probability of Target Attainment Analyses in Asian Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia Treated With Ceftaroline Fosamil. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2019 Jul;8(5):682-694. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.673. Epub 2019 May 1.

  • Cheng K, Pypstra R, Yan JL, Hammond J. Summary of the safety and tolerability of two treatment regimens of ceftaroline fosamil: 600 mg every 8 h versus 600 mg every 12 h. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Apr 1;74(4):1086-1091. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky519.

  • Das S, Li J, Iaconis J, Zhou D, Stone GG, Yan JL, Melnick D. Ceftaroline fosamil doses and breakpoints for Staphylococcus aureus in complicated skin and soft tissue infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Feb 1;74(2):425-431. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky439.

  • Taboada M, Melnick D, Iaconis JP, Sun F, Zhong NS, File TM, Llorens L, Friedland HD, Wilson D. Ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Apr;71(4):862-70. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv415. Epub 2015 Dec 24.

  • Zhong NS, Sun T, Zhuo C, D'Souza G, Lee SH, Lan NH, Chiang CH, Wilson D, Sun F, Iaconis J, Melnick D. Ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of Asian patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority with nested superiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Feb;15(2):161-71. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71018-7. Epub 2014 Dec 22.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

CeftarolineCeftriaxone

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cephalosporinsbeta-LactamsLactamsAmidesOrganic ChemicalsThiazinesSulfur CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsCefotaximeCephacetrile

Results Point of Contact

Title
Melnick, David A / Exec Dir Med Science
Organization
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals

Study Officials

  • David Melnick

    AstraZeneca

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2011

First Posted

June 13, 2011

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion

May 1, 2013

Study Completion

May 1, 2013

Last Updated

September 6, 2017

Results First Posted

September 23, 2014

Record last verified: 2017-09

Locations