Safety and Effectiveness of a Non-invasive Neuromodulation Device on Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Overactive Bladder
Beacon
Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of a Transcutaneous, High-frequency, Amplitude-modulated, Non-invasive Neuromodulation Device on Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Subjects With Overactive Bladder (OAB)
1 other identifier
interventional
163
1 country
14
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the change from baseline between the active and sham treatment groups in the treatment of urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes (leaks).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 11, 2014
CompletedSeptember 11, 2014
September 1, 2014
1.6 years
May 24, 2011
April 14, 2014
September 4, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Evaluate Proportion of Responders Based on the Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups
The primary objective of the randomized phase of the study is to evaluate the 12 week change from baseline in mean urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes (leaks) between the active and sham treatment groups. The mean of the number of urinary incontinence episodes over 24 hours" is defined as the mean of the number of UIEs recorded per 24 hour period for three consecutive days (via a 3-day diary). The primary objective of the open label phase of the study is to evaluate and confirm the continued efficacy of the VERV™ System for long-term use. The primary objective was assessed with rate of responders, where responder was defined as a subject who achieved a decrease of ≥50% in mean urgency urinary incontinence episodes at 12 weeks compared to baseline.
12 weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label)
Evaluate the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups
The primary objective of the randomized phase of the study is to evaluate the 12 week and 12 month median change from baseline in mean urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes (leaks) between treatment groups. The mean of the number of urinary incontinence episodes over 24 hours" is defined as the mean of the number of UIEs recorded per 24 hour period for three consecutive days (via a 3-day diary). Mean urinary frequency episodes calculated for each patient during time period. The median change in frequency was then calculated for each treatment group. Distribution of changes from baseline were then assessed prospectively for normality using the Kolmogorov - Smirnoff test. Since departure from normality was actually observed in the distribution, the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was performed to compare the median change between treatment groups and the p-values for the test of equality of medians were reported along with the medians.
12 weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Measure Change in the Median of the Mean Urinary Frequency
12 weeks and 12 Months
Measure Median Change in Mean Volume Per Void
12 weeks
Measure Decrease in the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency Episodes
12 weeks
Measure Improvement in the Median of the Mean OAB-Symptom Composite Score
12 weeks
Change in Median Total Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) of OAB-q From Baseline (Screening) to Week 12
12 Weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label).
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active Treatment group
ACTIVE COMPARATORVERV™ System
Sham Treatment Group
SHAM COMPARATORSham version of (VERV™ System)
Interventions
Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and Females, at least 18 years of age
- Failure on primary OAB treatment, such as behavior modification or fluid/diet management, AND at least one (1) anti-cholinergic drug (unless patient was contra-indicated for anti-cholinergic use)
- Symptoms of overactive bladder for at least 6 months
- An average of one (1) or more urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes per 24-hours, over a 3-day period, confirmed by the 3-day baseline voiding diary, with a maximum of 12 urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes per 24-hours
- Dexterity and ability to place and operate the device
- Females of child-bearing capability agrees to use a reliable form of birth control for the duration of the trial
- An average of eight (8) or more voids per 24-hours, over a 3-day period, confirmed by the 3-day baseline voiding diary
- Willing and capable of understanding and complying with all requirements of the protocol, including proper completion of the baseline voiding diary
- Signed and dated the IRB-approved Informed Consent document.
You may not qualify if:
- Dysfunctional voiding symptoms unrelated to OAB, such as clinically significant bladder outlet obstruction, and urinary retention (pvr \> 100 cc)
- Morbidly obese, defined as having Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2
- Stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence
- Neurological disease affecting urinary bladder function, including but not limited to Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, spinal cord injury and uncontrolled epilepsy.
- Pelvic surgery (such as sub-urethral sling, pelvic floor repair) within the past 6 months
- Intravesical or urethral sphincter Botulinum Toxin Type A injections within the past 12 months
- Any neuromodulation therapy for overactive bladder within the past 3 months
- Failure to respond to previous neuromodulation therapy for overactive bladder
- Leading edge of any vaginal prolapse is beyond hymenel ring.
- Prior peri-urethral or transurethral bulking agent injections for bladder problems within the past 12 months.
- Any skin conditions affecting treatment or assessment of the treatment sites
- History of lower back surgery or injury that could impact placement of the patch, or where underlying scar tissue or nerve damage may impact treatment.
- Presence of an implanted electro-medical device (e.g. pacemaker, defibrillator, InterStim®, etc.), or any metallic implant in the lower back.
- Pregnant, nursing, suspected to be pregnant (by urine pregnancy method), or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study.
- Known latex allergies, or allergies or hypersensitivity to patch materials that will be in contact with the body (e.g., hydrogel, acrylic-based adhesive, polyurethane).
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ethicon Endo-Surgerylead
- Novella Clinicalcollaborator
- Data & Inference, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (14)
Arizona Urologic Specialists
Tucson, Arizona, 85712-5803, United States
Tri Valley Urology Medical Group
Murrieta, California, 92562, United States
GW Medical Faculty Associates
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037, United States
Specialists in Urology
Naples, Florida, 34102, United States
Urology Center of Florida
Pompano Beach, Florida, 33060, United States
Women's Health Institute of Illlinois, Ltd
Oak Lawn, Illinois, 60453, United States
1st Urology, PSC dba Metropolitan Urology
Jeffersonville, Indiana, 47130, United States
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
University Urology Associates
New York, New York, 10016, United States
McKay Urology
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
Alliance Urology Specialists, P.A.
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27403, United States
Carolina Urologic Research
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572, United States
Integrity Medical Research
Mountlake Terrace, Washington, 98043, United States
Wheaton Franciscan Medical Group - Milwaukee Urogynecology
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
There was a higher than anticipated rate of patient withdrawals observed in both groups due to skin irritation.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- John Lombard, Manager Clinical Research
- Organization
- Ethicon Surgical Care
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Kennelly, MD
McKay Urology
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2011
First Posted
June 9, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
September 11, 2014
Results First Posted
September 11, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-09