NCT01367704

Brief Summary

Despite the high prevalence of adolescent relationship abuse (ARA) reported among adolescent females and substantial reports of perpetration by young males, effective prevention programs to prevent ARA are limited. Male athletes are an important target for prevention efforts given their higher rates of abuse perpetration compared to non-athlete peers as well as their social influence among their peers. This cluster-randomized school-based investigation examines the effectiveness of a program for the primary prevention of ARA. "Coaching Boys into Men" (CBIM) is a social norms theory-based program intended to alter norms that foster ARA perpetration, promote bystander intervention, and reduce ARA perpetration by engaging athletic coaches as positive role models to deliver violence prevention scripts and tools to high school age male athletes. Coaches receive a 60-minute training session to administer the intervention to their athletes via 11 lessons across a sport season. Trained high school coaches talk to their male athletes about 1) what constitutes disrespectful and harmful vs. respectful behaviors, 2) promoting more gender-equitable attitudes, and 3) modeling bystander intervention when disrespectful behaviors toward women and girls are witnessed. The current investigation evaluates the intervention in 16 urban high schools randomized either to receive the CBIM program (i.e., intervention schools, n=8) or to a control condition (n=8). Baseline computer-based surveys are collected for all intervention and control site student athletes entering grades 9 through 12 at the start of each of three sports seasons across Year 1 (Time 1). Follow up surveys are collected for these same athletes at the end of their first sports season (Time 2). Participating athletes in grades 9 - 11 at baseline are re-surveyed 12 months after Time 1 to examine the longer term effects of the CBIM intervention (Time 3; N of athletes completing all 3 waves of data collection = 1500). Primary assessment of intervention effects are based on intent-to-treat estimates, utilizing generalized linear mixed models to account for clustering arising from school randomization. Hypothesized outcomes for male athletes include a) an increase in recognition of what constitutes abusive behaviors, b) more gender-equitable attitudes, c) an increase in intentions and reports of bystander intervention regarding ARA, and through these intermediate outcomes, d) a decrease in perpetration of ARA among adolescent male athletes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,006

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2009

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2009

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 1, 2011

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 7, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2011

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 8, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

August 8, 2014

Status Verified

July 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

June 1, 2011

Results QC Date

May 29, 2014

Last Update Submit

July 16, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

gender-based violenceintimate partner violencerelationship abusesexual harassmentsexual violence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Change From Baseline to 3 Months Using the Recognition of Abusive Behavior Scale

    Recognition of disrespectful and harmful behaviors against girls as abusive comparing baseline and follow up mean scores, using a 5-point Likert-like scale ranging from "not abusive" to "extremely abusive" (minimum = 1 and maximum = 5). This scale was developed by Silverman et al to assess perceptions of the degree of abusiveness of specified relationship behaviors and modeled as a mean of responses to 12 items.

    3 months

  • Change From Baseline to 3 Months Using the Gender Equitable Attitudes Scale

    Assessment of gender-equitable attitudes comparing baseline mean score with follow up mean score, using a 5-point Likert-like scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree" (minimum = 1 and maximum = 5). This scale includes questions modified from Barker's Gender-Equitable Norms Scale and modeled as a mean of responses to 11 items.

    3 months

  • Change From Baseline to 3 Months Using the Intentions to Intervene Scale

    Proclivity to intervene when witnessing disrespectful and harmful behaviors among peers comparing baseline and follow up mean scores, using a 5-point Likert-like scale ranging from "very unlikely" to "very likely" (minimum = 1 and maximum = 5). This scale was investigator developed by Miller (PI) et al to assess participants report of how likely they would be to do something to stop the behavior and modeled as a mean of 8 items.

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Control School

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Control schools (where the coaches do not receive the Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) training until following academic year 'wait list control')

Behavioral: "Coaching Boys Into Men" program

Intervention School

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention schools (where coaches receive the CBIM training at start of sports season)

Behavioral: "Coaching Boys Into Men" program

Interventions

Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) program consists of a 60 minute training for high school coaches led by a violence prevention advocate to introduce coaches to the rationale for CBIM and the CBIM Coaches Kit. The Coaches use this CBIM toolkit to provide weekly discussions with their athletes (generally 10-15 minute mini-sessions) throughout their athletic season (11 weeks). Discussion topics include how to prevent disrespectful and harmful behaviors towards women and girls and how to promote healthy choices and relationships among youth.

Control SchoolIntervention School

Eligibility Criteria

Age14 Years - 18 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • urban and suburban public high schools in Sacramento region with athletics program

You may not qualify if:

  • Coach Eligibility:
  • coaching an athletic team at one of the participating schools (intervention or control)
  • age 18 or older
  • not coaching an athletic team at the participating schools
  • Athlete Eligibility:
  • ages 14-18 (grades 9 to 12)
  • student at one of the participating high schools
  • able to read English
  • participating in an athletic program led by a coach willing to participate in the research study
  • outside age range
  • not participating on sports team at the high school in which they are enrolled

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Jones KA, Tancredi DJ, Abebe KZ, Paglisotti T, Miller E. Cases of Sexual Assault Prevented in an Athletic Coach-Delivered Gender Violence Prevention Program. Prev Sci. 2021 May;22(4):504-508. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01210-1. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

  • Miller E, Tancredi DJ, McCauley HL, Decker MR, Virata MCD, Anderson HA, O'Connor B, Silverman JG. One-year follow-up of a coach-delivered dating violence prevention program: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):108-112. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.007.

  • Miller E, Tancredi DJ, McCauley HL, Decker MR, Virata MC, Anderson HA, Stetkevich N, Brown EW, Moideen F, Silverman JG. "Coaching boys into men": a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a dating violence prevention program. J Adolesc Health. 2012 Nov;51(5):431-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.01.018. Epub 2012 Mar 25.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sexual Harassment

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sexual BehaviorBehaviorSocial Behavior

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Elizabeth Miller
Organization
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Elizabeth Miller, MD, PhD

    Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief, Division of Adolescent Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2011

First Posted

June 7, 2011

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion

October 1, 2011

Study Completion

October 1, 2011

Last Updated

August 8, 2014

Results First Posted

August 8, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-07

Locations