Study to Assess the Absorption and Tolerability of Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine and to Assess the Effects of Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate on the Absorption and Tolerability of Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine in Participants With Allergic Rhinitis
Open Label, Three-Way Study to Assess the Absorption and Tolerability of Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine and to Assess the Effects of a Single Dose of Oxymetazoline Hydrochloride and Multiple Doses of Fluticasone Propionate on the Absorption and Tolerability of Intranasal Ketorolac Tromethamine in Participants With Allergic Rhinitis
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This was an open label, three way study in participants with symptomatic allergic rhinitis. The following 3 treatments were administered to each subject during dosing periods 1, 2 and 3, respectively:
- Treatment A: Single intranasal dose of 30 mg ketorolac tromethamine (one 15 mg spray into each nostril) on Day 1 of Period 1.
- Treatment B: Single intranasal dose of oxymetazoline hydrochloride followed by a single intranasal dose of 30 mg ketorolac tromethamine (one 15 mg spray into each nostril) 30 minutes later on Day 1 of Period 2.
- Treatment C: Seven days of treatment with intranasal fluticasone propionate (between Periods 2 and 3) followed by a single intranasal dose of 30 mg ketorolac tromethamine (one 15 mg spray into each nostril) on Day 1 of Period 3. Subjects remained resident in the Clinical Unit from Day 1 until the morning of Day 2 in each period and there was a washout period of 2 to 7 days between periods. A post study medical was performed within 7 days of Period 3. The objectives of this study were:
- To assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intranasal ketorolac in participants with symptomatic allergic rhinitis.
- To assess the effects of a single dose of intranasal oxymetazoline hydrochloride on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of intranasal ketorolac in participants with symptomatic allergic rhinitis.
- To assess the effects of chronic administration of fluticasone propionate on the bioavailability and tolerability of intranasal ketorolac in participants with symptomatic allergic rhinitis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Dec 2007
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 23, 2015
CompletedMarch 6, 2018
March 1, 2018
2 months
June 1, 2011
August 6, 2012
March 2, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Cmax (the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration)
PK analysis by standard model was performed by a pharmacokineticist using model-independent analysis methods in WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each time, together with individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac.
Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 hours post administration of ketorolac tromethamine
Tmax (the Time to Maximum Concentration)
PK analysis by standard model was performed by a pharmacokineticist using model-independent analysis methods in WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each time, together with individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac.
Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 hours post administration of ketorolac tromethamine
AUC 0-t (the Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Time Point Post-dose)
PK analysis by standard model was performed by a pharmacokineticist using model-independent analysis methods in WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each time, together with individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac.
Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 hours post administration of ketorolac tromethamine
AUC 0-∞ (the AUC From Time Zero to Infinity, Where Possible)
PK analysis by standard model was performed by a pharmacokineticist using model-independent analysis methods in WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each time, together with individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac.
Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 hours post administration of ketorolac tromethamine
t1/2z (the Terminal Half-life, Where Possible)
PK analysis by standard model was performed by a pharmacokineticist using model-independent analysis methods in WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each time, together with individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac.
Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 hours post administration of ketorolac tromethamine
MRT (the Mean Residence Time)
PK analysis by standard model was performed by a pharmacokineticist using model-independent analysis methods in WinNonlin Professional. Actual blood sampling times for ketorolac assay were converted to a time from dosing (elapsed time). Elapsed times were listed by subject for each time, together with individual plasma concentrations of ketorolac.
Blood samples for PK analyses were obtained at pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 15 and 24 hours post administration of ketorolac tromethamine
Study Arms (3)
Ketorolac Tromethamine
EXPERIMENTALOxymetazoline Hydrochloride
EXPERIMENTALFluticasone Propionate
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Single intranasal dose of 30 mg ketorolac tromethamine (one 15 mg spray into each nostril) on Day 1 of Period 1
Single intranasal dose of oxymetazoline hydrochloride followed by a single intranasal dose of 30 mg ketorolac tromethamine (one 15 mg spray into each nostril) 30 minutes later on Day 1 of Period 2
Seven days of treatment with intranasal fluticasone propionate (between Periods 2 and 3) followed by a single intranasal dose of 30 mg ketorolac tromethamine (one 15 mg spray into each nostril) on Day 1 of Period 3
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female volunteers, aged between 18 and 65 years inclusive
- Participant had a history of allergic rhinitis for which treatment had been required at least 3 days out of 7 within the last 3 months. Subjects who were symptomatic of allergic rhinitis but were not currently using therapy because they had found it ineffective may have been included
- Participant was otherwise considered to exhibit general good health, in the opinion of the Investigator
- Participants may have had known medical conditions that were considered "stable" and not expected to interfere with the study outcome or to be adversely affected by their involvement in the study. This was determined by the Investigator at the time of screening by the following:
- A pre-study physical examination with no clinically significant abnormalities
- Vital signs within normal ranges or outside the normal range but not deemed clinically significant in the opinion of the Investigator
- An electrocardiogram (ECG) with no clinically significant abnormalities
- Full medical history
- Participant had bilateral patent nasal airways at screening as assessed by the Investigator
- Participant had a body mass index (BMI) between 19 and 29 kg/m2
- Female participants of child bearing potential:
- Must have had a negative urine pregnancy test prior to entry into the study
- Must not have been breast feeding
- Participant must have been able to provide written informed consent
- Participant's pre-study clinical laboratory findings were within normal range or if outside of the normal range not deemed clinically significant in the opinion of the Investigator
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Any known allergy or sensitivity to ketorolac tromethamine, oxymetazoline hydrochloride, fluticasone propionate or formulation ingredients
- Any history of co-existing nasal polyps, NSAID sensitivity and asthma
- Daily use of an intranasal decongestant medication
- Allergic reaction to aspirin or other NSAIDs
- Current upper respiratory tract infection or other respiratory tract condition that could have interfered with the absorption of the nasal spray or with the assessment of AEs
- Use of any non-prescribed drug in the 72 hours prior to study drug administration and during the study. Paracetamol use was not allowed within the 24 hours prior to Day 1 of each period. NSAIDs were restricted for at least 3 days or 5 half-lives, whichever was longer, prior to dosing on Day 1 of Period 1, and must not have been used throughout the study. Current prescribed medications were not discontinued prior to entry into the study or during study participation, unless known to interact with ketorolac as per the product information (injectable)
- Any suspicion of rhinitis medicamentosa (chronic daily use of topical decongestants)
- Use of a monoamine oxidase inhibitor in the 14 days prior to study entry
- Positive serum test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis B or C at screening
- Positive serum alcohol test at screening or on entry into the study
- Positive urine drug screen for any non-prescribed drugs of abuse (DOA) at screening or on entry into the study
- Clinically significant abnormality on screening laboratory tests
- History of cocaine use
- Concurrent use of ritonavir or other potent CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors.
- Blood donation within 30 days of beginning study participation
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Egalet Ltdlead
Study Sites (1)
Pain and Anaesthesia Research Clinic/Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, Australia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- David Bregman, M.D., Ph.D.
- Organization
- Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lincoln Bynum, MD
ICON Developmental Solutions
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2011
First Posted
June 3, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2007
Primary Completion
February 1, 2008
Study Completion
June 1, 2008
Last Updated
March 6, 2018
Results First Posted
July 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2018-03