NCT01364025

Brief Summary

Is routine uterosacral ligament suspension an appropriate clinical adjunct at the time of hysterectomy? The answers to these questions will facilitate the treatment of many American women. With the results of this study, the investigators would anticipate a reduction in the number of surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse. In addition, if uterosacral ligament suspension was shown to be ineffective, it would not be used routinely in the setting of hysterectomy and women will be spared the additional procedure and possibility of side effects or complications. The relative risks and benefits of adding a prophylactic uterosacral ligament suspension at the time of hysterectomy in women without symptomatic prolapse symptoms have never been studied prospectively.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
800

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2011

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 31, 2011

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 2, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2011

Completed
9.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 21, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 21, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 25, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

9.6 years

First QC Date

May 31, 2011

Last Update Submit

February 21, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To compare the occurrence of objective findings of pelvic organ prolapse beyond hymen after uterosacral ligament suspension of the vaginal apex at the time of hysterectomy vs. hysterectomy alone using Pelvic Floor Quantitative Examination

    one year and annual thereafter for 5 years

Study Arms (2)

uterosacral ligament suspension

EXPERIMENTAL

uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy sutures will be placed bilaterally at the time of hysterectomy

Procedure: uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy bilateral

hysterectomy alone

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

Uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy bilateral

Also known as: uterosacral ligament suspension at the time of hysterectomy
uterosacral ligament suspension

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 99 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Eligibility for primary procedure (hysterectomy either total or supracervical, performed either vaginally or abdominally, via laparoscopic or open approach)
  • Eligibility for secondary procedure (uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy)
  • Prolapse in any compartment not extending beyond the hymen as measured by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative system
  • No subjective complaints of Pelvic Organ Prolapse as determined by answer "no" to questions #3 of the short form of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory: #3. Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in the vaginal area?

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindication for uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy. (Surgeon's judgment that a contraindication to uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy exists).
  • Anticipated geographic relocation within the 12 months after surgery
  • Inability to provide informed consent or to complete testing or data collection.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kaiser Permanente San Diego

San Diego, California, 92110, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • Marianna Alperin, MD

    Kaiser Permanente

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2011

First Posted

June 2, 2011

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion

February 21, 2021

Study Completion

February 21, 2021

Last Updated

February 25, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-02

Locations