Study of the Surgical Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis Using a Non-invasive Growing Rod
A Prospective Cohort Study of the Surgical Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis Using a Remotely Expandable Device for Non-invasive Lengthening of a Growing Rod (Magec™) and Its Performance in Prevention of Progression of Scoliosis.
1 other identifier
observational
14
1 country
2
Brief Summary
It is current practice for children who have surgery for early onset scoliosis (EOS) to be treated with insertion of extendable implants known as growth rod systems. This allows the growth potential of the child to be maximised during the period of growth. However, the child must undergo an average of 6 further surgeries to lengthen the rods every 6 months. Sometimes this may continue for several years. This requires repeated general anaesthesia and places the patient at risk of complications as well as on-going costs to the hospital with each admission and theatre episode. Magec is a magnetic growth rod from Ellipse technologies (distributed by SurgiC). The rod is inserted in exactly the same way as the conventional growth rod systems. The base implants i.e screws and hooks remain the preferred choice of the user. The only change is that a different rod is used. There are several advantages to this device. Firstly, after the initial insertion, further lengthenings, unlike current systems, do not need to be carried out in theatre under a general anaesthetic. In contrast, they can be done in an outpatients setting with a non-invasive technique. The rods are lengthened using an external magnetic device. The lengthenings are done in a controlled manner using an age related growth guide. Thirdly, the change from a theatre based intervention to an outpatient procedure will have cost-savings. The investigators also believe that there will be psychosocial benefits to the child and family by the avoiding the stress associated with repeated surgery at such a young age. In terms of risk assessment the device does not place the child at any more risk than would be expected from inserting any of the existing systems. In the event of failure of the rods the worst outcome is a revision to conventional rods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jan 2012
Longer than P75 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2017
CompletedSeptember 1, 2017
June 1, 2017
4.1 years
May 27, 2011
August 31, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To Assess the Safety and effectiveness of a Magnetic Growth Rod
2 Years From Final Recruitment Date
Eligibility Criteria
Study population will be recruited from secondary care
You may qualify if:
- Patient aged 2 - 10 years (male/female) with EOS and growth potential
- Patient who surgeon feels would benefit from the implantation of a growth rod
- Patient must be of appropriate size and age for use of the device
- Patient's guardian is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
- Patient (and guardian) is willing and able to return for all follow-up visits and study related procedures
- The patient's guardian is willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study
You may not qualify if:
- The participant may not enter the study if ANY of the following apply:
- Conversion patients with prior construct problems
- Previous diagnosis of post-operative spinal infection or wound complication
- Conversion patients with more than 3 previous distractions, or more than 2 years since initial surgery
- Patients with prior failure of other devices
- Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study
- Participants who have participated in another research study involving an investigational product in the past 12 weeks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Leeds Teaching Hospitals
Leeds, United Kingdom
Oxford University NHS Trust
Oxford, United Kingdom
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Colin Nnadi
Consultant Surgeon
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2011
First Posted
May 30, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 31, 2017
Last Updated
September 1, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06