Sponsor study identifier
interventional
999
1 country
4
Study Start
April 2011
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
December 2011
Actual (reported)Study Completion
December 2011
Actual (reported)Purpose: This randomised trial will compare outcomes and acceptability of an alternative medical abortion follow-up protocol using standardised text messaging, on-line questionnaire, or a phone interview and a low sensitivity pregnancy test with the current standard of care which consists of either a clinic visit and ultrasound scan or a telephone call and high sensitivity pregnancy test. Hypothesis: The use of "alternative" methods to assess outcomes after early medical abortion will achieve a higher rate of follow-up than women undergoing "standard" follow-up Primary aim: To determine the follow-up rate after early medical abortion with an alternative protocol as compared to a standard follow-up protocol Secondary aims:
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
December 2011
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
April 2011
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
May 2, 2011
Actual (reported)May 30, 2011
Actual (reported)December 2011
Actual (reported)December 2011
Actual (reported)Number of women with complete clinical information on post-abortion status
The primary purpose of this trial is to compare the ability of the two systems to identify the number of women who require additional medical abortion-related care.
14 days
Women assigned to Group 1 will receive the standard post-abortion follow-up currently used at bpas and will be undertaken as usual by staff at the treating clinic
Follow-up after medical abortion using a standard text message, online or telephone questionnaire and a low sensitivity urine pregnancy test.
Women (n=1000) will be allocated by chance to one of two groups: alternative follow-up using a standard text message, online or telephone questionnaire and a low sensitivity urine pregnancy test, or standard follow-up which consists of an in person visit with an ultrasound or a telephone call and high sensitivity pregnancy test.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Birmingham Day Care Unit
Birmingham, United Kingdom
Chester Day Care Unit
Chester, United Kingdom
London Central Day Care Unit
London, United Kingdom
Luton Day Care Unit
Luton, United Kingdom
Hillary Bracken, PhD
Gynuity Health Projects
999 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
May 2, 2011
First Posted
May 30, 2011
Study Start
April 2011
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
December 2011
Actual (reported)Study Completion
December 2011
Actual (reported)Last Updated
February 15, 2013
Record last verified: 2011-05
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: