NCT01362270

Brief Summary

BACKGROUND Many patients in the trauma intensive care unit (TICU) require mechanical ventilation and sedation or anxiolysis. Mechanical ventilation means that a machine is helping a patient breathe if he can't breathe on his own. Because of the mechanical ventilation, these patients also require some medication to help keep them calm. These are called sedatives or anxiolytics. The purpose of this study is to see if acupuncture can lower the amount of sedation and anxiolysis needed by a subject during mechanical ventilation in the TICU. Acupuncture is a medical procedure. Hair-thin sterile needles are inserted at specific points on the body. PROCEDURES Some subjects will get acupuncture and others will get 'fake' acupuncture. By using 'fake' acupuncture, no one other than the acupuncturists will know which group a subject is in. Subjects and the team do not get to pick which subject is in which group. Instead, the groups are picked randomly. Subjects will get real or fake acupuncture twice a day for five days. Standard of care - Both groups will receive the standard of care while in the study. They will be mechanically ventilated and given sedatives and analgesics based on the TICU protocol. Real acupuncture group - This group will receive real acupuncture with real needles. These are stainless steel, one time use, needles. This group will also receive "ear tacks" which are like little needles that can stay on the ear for a few days. The ear tacks will be covered with a bandage so no one can tell which group the subject is in. Sham acupuncture group - This group will receive sham needles. These needles retract into themselves much like a 'magic sword' rather than poking the skin. Subjects in this group will not get ear tacks. In order to hide the group the subject is in, a bandage will be used to cover part of the ear. HYPOTHESIS Real acupuncture will decrease subject's sedation requirements by 30% when compared to the sham acupuncture group.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2011

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 25, 2011

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 30, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2011

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2015

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 20, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 20, 2020

Status Verified

March 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

May 25, 2011

Results QC Date

November 14, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 19, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

AnxiolyticsSedativesAcupuncture Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Success of Blinding

    Care team, family and subject will be surveyed to determine success of blinding. Responses will be tallied and correlated with group assignments.

    Nurse surveyed daily for length of study (five [5] days). Physician and subject (or subject's family if he/she is unable to complete the questionnaire) surveyed upon study completion, six (6) days after enrollment.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RAAS) Score

    Median RAAS score during treatment (5 days)

  • Length of Ventilator Dependence

    Number hourss subject is ventilated. Subjects are expected to be ventilator dependent an average of 120 hours. Assessed up to discharge (estimated 3 weeks).

Study Arms (2)

Verum Acupuncture

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects will receive acupuncture using real acupuncture needles.

Device: Verum Acupuncture

Sham acupuncture

SHAM COMPARATOR

Subjects will receive sham acupuncture therapy using the Streitberger needle at the same points and on the same schedule as patients in the treatment group. Streitberger needles are blunt tipped and retract into themselves rather than penetrating the skin.

Device: Sham Acupuncture

Interventions

DOSAGE: 25 acupoints per session FREQUENCY: 2 sessions per day DURATION: 5 days

Also known as: Special No. 16 needles (Gauge 8 x 1.2")
Verum Acupuncture

DOSAGE: 25 acupoints per session FREQUENCY: 2 sessions per day DURATION: 5 days

Also known as: Streitberger Placebo-needles (Gauge 8 x 1.2")
Sham acupuncture

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Trauma patient ≥ 18 years admitted to the Trauma ICU
  • Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 4
  • Mechanically ventilated \< 24 hours with anticipated need \> 24 hours

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to obtain consent from patient or designee
  • Receiving immunosuppressive therapy
  • Receiving therapeutic anticoagulant therapy
  • History of bleeding disorder, INR \> 1.5, PTT \> 65, PLT \< 20K
  • Pregnancy
  • Three (3) or more inaccessible acupoints
  • Head injury with elevated intracranial pressure or requiring operation
  • Patients with midline abdominal incision
  • Non-english speaking
  • Receipt of dexmedetomidine prior to or during study period

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU)

Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Greif R, Laciny S, Mokhtarani M, Doufas AG, Bakhshandeh M, Dorfer L, Sessler DI. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation of an auricular acupuncture point decreases anesthetic requirement. Anesthesiology. 2002 Feb;96(2):306-12. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200202000-00014.

    PMID: 11818761BACKGROUND
  • Wang SM, Kain ZN. Auricular acupuncture: a potential treatment for anxiety. Anesth Analg. 2001 Feb;92(2):548-53. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200102000-00049.

    PMID: 11159266BACKGROUND
  • Nayak S, Wenstone R, Jones A, Nolan J, Strong A, Carson J. Surface electrostimulation of acupuncture points for sedation of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit--a pilot study. Acupunct Med. 2008 Mar;26(1):1-7. doi: 10.1136/aim.26.1.1.

    PMID: 18356793BACKGROUND
  • McManus CA, Schnyer RN, Kong J, Nguyen LT, Hyun Nam B, Goldman R, Stason WB, Kaptchuk TJ. Sham acupuncture devices--practical advice for researchers. Acupunct Med. 2007 Jun;25(1-2):36-40. doi: 10.1136/aim.25.1-2.36.

    PMID: 17641566BACKGROUND
  • Shapiro MB, West MA, Nathens AB, Harbrecht BG, Moore FA, Bankey PE, Freeman B, Johnson JL, McKinley BA, Minei JP, Moore EE, Maier RV; Inflammation and the Host Response to Injury Large Scale Collaborative Research Project. V. Guidelines for sedation and analgesia during mechanical ventilation general overview. J Trauma. 2007 Oct;63(4):945-50. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318142d21b. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18090028BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DeliriumRespiratory Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ConfusionNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersRespiration DisordersRespiratory Tract Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Samantha Underwood, Research Manager
Organization
Oregon Health & Science University

Study Officials

  • Jennifer M Watters, MD

    Oregon Health and Science University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor of Surgery, Director Surgical Critical Care

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2011

First Posted

May 30, 2011

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion

July 1, 2015

Study Completion

July 1, 2015

Last Updated

March 20, 2020

Results First Posted

March 20, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-03

Locations