NCT01360346

Brief Summary

Recent studies suggest the employment of 'conscious' sedation (1) for critically high - risk patients (2), showing more efficacy then deep sedation (3). The investigators want to compare intravenous injection versus enteral sedative drugs administration, purposing to maintain a 'conscious' sedation level compatibly with the needed cares, invasive procedures, and medical and nursing surveillance.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2012

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 20, 2011

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 25, 2011

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2012

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

April 24, 2012

Status Verified

April 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

May 20, 2011

Last Update Submit

April 23, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Enteral SedationIntravenous SedationCritically ill ICU patientConscious SedationDeep SedationRASSCAM-ICUVNRBPSPropofolMidazolamHydroxyzineLorazepamMelatonin

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percent of efficacy, measured by observed RASS = desired RASS ± 1.

    One year

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Sedation protocol effectiveness: percentage of "protocol violation days" on the total of ICU days.

    One year

  • Delirium and coma free days (respectively negative CAM-ICU and RASS > - 3 in all daily observations until 28° ICU day) (11)

    One year

  • Ventilation free days (12)

    One year

  • Nursing evaluation of sedation adequacy (communication skills, cooperation, environment tolerance) (13)

    One year

  • Overall ICU and hospital mortality, absolute mortality after 1 year from ICU discharge.

    24 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Enteral Sedation (EN)

EXPERIMENTAL

Melatonin, Hydroxyzine, and Lorazepam. At every work shift, it will be checked the possibility to decrease the Lorazepam and then the Hydroxyzine dosage to quickly obtain and continuously maintain a RASS level = 0

Procedure: Enteral Sedation (EN)

Intravenous Sedation (IV)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intravenous propofol or midazolam administration at the ICU admission to discharge at the compatible lowest level with harsh ICU environment. At every shift nurses are requested to give intravenous lowest dosage to obtain RASS=0

Procedure: Control group: Intravenous Sedation (IV)

Interventions

Intravenous propofol or midazolam administration at the ICU admission and stopped within 48h. Melatonin by enteral route (3mg x 2/die) from admission to discharge. Hydroxyzine by enteral route from ICU admission (600mg/die), decreased and stopped as soon as possible. Lorazepam supplementation (maximum 16mg/die) if hydroxyzine is inadequate.

Also known as: ENTERAL
Enteral Sedation (EN)

Propofol or midazolam from ICU admission to discharge at the compatible lowest level with harsh ICU environment.

Also known as: INTRAVENOUS
Intravenous Sedation (IV)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • High Risk Patients (Ventilation days assessment \>3, SAPS II \>32).
  • Until 24 h after ICU admission
  • Age \> 18 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Neurosurgical patients
  • Allergy to medications used in the study
  • CNS diseases (epilepsy, ictus, dementia, anoxic coma…)
  • Liver encephalopathy (Child C)
  • Previous psychiatric or cognitive pathology
  • Absolute contraindications to use enteral route (acceptable NGT, digiunostomy, ileostomy)
  • Pregnant patients or in breast-feeding
  • DNR patients

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

AO San Paolo - Polo Universitario

Milan, 20142, Italy

RECRUITING

Related Publications (15)

  • Strom T, Martinussen T, Toft P. A protocol of no sedation for critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):475-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62072-9. Epub 2010 Jan 29.

    PMID: 20116842BACKGROUND
  • Iapichino G, Mistraletti G, Corbella D, Bassi G, Borotto E, Miranda DR, Morabito A. Scoring system for the selection of high-risk patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2006 Apr;34(4):1039-43. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000206286.19444.40.

    PMID: 16484895BACKGROUND
  • Payen JF, Chanques G, Mantz J, Hercule C, Auriant I, Leguillou JL, Binhas M, Genty C, Rolland C, Bosson JL. Current practices in sedation and analgesia for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a prospective multicenter patient-based study. Anesthesiology. 2007 Apr;106(4):687-95; quiz 891-2. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000264747.09017.da.

    PMID: 17413906BACKGROUND
  • Cigada M, Pezzi A, Di Mauro P, Marzorati S, Noto A, Valdambrini F, Zaniboni M, Astori M, Iapichino G. Sedation in the critically ill ventilated patient: possible role of enteral drugs. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Mar;31(3):482-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2559-7. Epub 2005 Feb 16.

    PMID: 15714324BACKGROUND
  • Cigada M, Corbella D, Mistraletti G, Forster CR, Tommasino C, Morabito A, Iapichino G. Conscious sedation in the critically ill ventilated patient. J Crit Care. 2008 Sep;23(3):349-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 Jul 5.

    PMID: 18725039BACKGROUND
  • Mistraletti G, Sabbatini G, Taverna M, Figini MA, Umbrello M, Magni P, Ruscica M, Dozio E, Esposti R, DeMartini G, Fraschini F, Rezzani R, Reiter RJ, Iapichino G. Pharmacokinetics of orally administered melatonin in critically ill patients. J Pineal Res. 2010 Mar;48(2):142-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-079X.2009.00737.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

    PMID: 20070489BACKGROUND
  • Girard TD, Kress JP, Fuchs BD, Thomason JW, Schweickert WD, Pun BT, Taichman DB, Dunn JG, Pohlman AS, Kinniry PA, Jackson JC, Canonico AE, Light RW, Shintani AK, Thompson JL, Gordon SM, Hall JB, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW. Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008 Jan 12;371(9607):126-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60105-1.

    PMID: 18191684BACKGROUND
  • Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138.

    PMID: 12421743BACKGROUND
  • Pandharipande PP, Sanders RD, Girard TD, McGrane S, Thompson JL, Shintani AK, Herr DL, Maze M, Ely EW; MENDS investigators. Effect of dexmedetomidine versus lorazepam on outcome in patients with sepsis: an a priori-designed analysis of the MENDS randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R38. doi: 10.1186/cc8916. Epub 2010 Mar 16.

    PMID: 20233428BACKGROUND
  • Inouye SK. Delirium in older persons. N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 16;354(11):1157-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052321. No abstract available.

    PMID: 16540616BACKGROUND
  • Pandharipande PP, Pun BT, Herr DL, Maze M, Girard TD, Miller RR, Shintani AK, Thompson JL, Jackson JC, Deppen SA, Stiles RA, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW. Effect of sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam on acute brain dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients: the MENDS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007 Dec 12;298(22):2644-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.22.2644.

    PMID: 18073360BACKGROUND
  • Schoenfeld DA, Bernard GR; ARDS Network. Statistical evaluation of ventilator-free days as an efficacy measure in clinical trials of treatments for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2002 Aug;30(8):1772-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200208000-00016.

    PMID: 12163791BACKGROUND
  • Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM, Ceraso D, Wisemandle W, Koura F, Whitten P, Margolis BD, Byrne DW, Ely EW, Rocha MG; SEDCOM (Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Compared With Midazolam) Study Group. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):489-99. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.56. Epub 2009 Feb 2.

    PMID: 19188334BACKGROUND
  • Mistraletti G, Umbrello M, Salini S, Cadringher P, Formenti P, Chiumello D, Villa C, Russo R, Francesconi S, Valdambrini F, Bellani G, Palo A, Riccardi F, Ferretti E, Festa M, Gado AM, Taverna M, Pinna C, Barbiero A, Ferrari PA, Iapichino G; SedaEN investigators. Enteral versus intravenous approach for the sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized and controlled trial. Crit Care. 2019 Jan 7;23(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2280-x.

  • Mistraletti G, Mantovani ES, Cadringher P, Cerri B, Corbella D, Umbrello M, Anania S, Andrighi E, Barello S, Di Carlo A, Martinetti F, Formenti P, Spanu P, Iapichino G; SedaEN investigators. Enteral vs. intravenous ICU sedation management: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Apr 3;14:92. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-92.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Iapichino Gaetano, MD

    University of Milan

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Giovanni Mistraletti, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
University Researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2011

First Posted

May 25, 2011

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion

October 1, 2012

Study Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

April 24, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-04

Locations