NCT01357824

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of Sellick´s Maneuver, a firm pressure on the throat, just below the Adams apple, to occlude the esophagus, in order to prevent aspiration of gastric contents, on intubation with a flexible fiberscope. The result of this study will be participate in the discussion of the importance of Sellick´s Maneuver.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2011

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 19, 2011

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 23, 2011

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

January 31, 2012

Status Verified

January 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

May 19, 2011

Last Update Submit

January 29, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

IntubationSellick´s maneuveraspiration[E05.497.578]

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time of intubation

    The investigators will find an eventually change in the time of intubation with and without Sellick´s Maneuver

    180 seconds

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of patients that cannot be intubated after 120 sec. with and without Sellick´s maneuver

    180 seconds

  • Fall of oxygen saturation after intubation with and without Sellick´s maneuver.

    180 seconds

  • Visualization of the vocal cords

    180 seconds

Study Arms (1)

Patients admitted for elective surgery

The patient admitted for elective surgery can be included, and will both the case and control, as we intubate the same patient twice, with and without Sellick´s maneuver.

Procedure: Application of Sellick´s maneuver.

Interventions

The patient will be intubated with a flexible fiberscope, Olympus model, under the application of Sellick´s maneuver, with the recommended 30 Newtons pressure, and also, as control, be intubated with a sham Sellick´s maneuver, with 0 Newton. The order of the pressures is randomized, and it is blinded to the intubating physician by a cloth which of the maneuvers that is used. The pressure is measured be a pediatric cuff, which is pressed against the throat.

Patients admitted for elective surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients admitted for elective surgery at Glostrup University Hospital

You may qualify if:

  • ASA I-II
  • Informed consent to participate in the study
  • Age 18 or older
  • Predicted difficult airways

You may not qualify if:

  • Body mass index more then 35
  • Patients with an indication for a rapid sequence induction (reflux, Hiatus herniation, Gastric bypass)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Operations- og Anæstesilogisk afd Y, Glostrup Hospital

Glostrup Municipality, 2600, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Smith CE, Boyer D. Cricoid pressure decreases ease of tracheal intubation using fibreoptic laryngoscopy (WuScope System. Can J Anaesth. 2002 Jun-Jul;49(6):614-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03017391.

    PMID: 12067876BACKGROUND
  • Asai T, Goy RW, Liu EH. Cricoid pressure prevents placement of the laryngeal tube and laryngeal tube-suction II. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Aug;99(2):282-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem159. Epub 2007 Jun 15.

    PMID: 17573388BACKGROUND
  • Haslam N, Parker L, Duggan JE. Effect of cricoid pressure on the view at laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2005 Jan;60(1):41-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.04010.x.

    PMID: 15601271BACKGROUND
  • Brisson P, Brisson M. Variable application and misapplication of cricoid pressure. J Trauma. 2010 Nov;69(5):1182-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d2793e.

    PMID: 21068621BACKGROUND
  • Ellis DY, Harris T, Zideman D. Cricoid pressure in emergency department rapid sequence tracheal intubations: a risk-benefit analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Dec;50(6):653-65. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Aug 3.

    PMID: 17681642BACKGROUND
  • Priebe HJ. Cricoid pressure: an expert's opinion. Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 Dec;75(12):710-4.

    PMID: 19940824BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric Contents

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Laryngopharyngeal RefluxGastroesophageal RefluxEsophageal Motility DisordersDeglutition DisordersEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesRespiratory AspirationRespiration DisordersRespiratory Tract DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Bjørn Arenkiel, MD

    Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CROSSOVER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Reservelæge

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2011

First Posted

May 23, 2011

Study Start

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion

October 1, 2011

Study Completion

November 1, 2011

Last Updated

January 31, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-01

Locations