Efficacy of Time-limited Psychodynamic Psychotherapy and Informed Clinical Management in BPD High MHS Users

NCT01356069 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: HUMHS-2004
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 35
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

Subjects affected with severe Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) are often heavy users of Mental Health Services (MHS). This study evaluates the efficacy of the addition of Sequential Brief Adlerian Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (SB-APP) to the treatment-as-usual (TAU) for BPD compared to the TAU alone for a naturalistic group of heavy MHS users with BPD. The efficacy was evaluated after at 6 time points along a two years of follow-up. Thirty-five outpatients eligible for the study were randomly assigned to two treatment groups (TAU=17; SB-APP=18). The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and the CGI-modified (CGI-M) for BPD, the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI), and the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised (SCL-90-R) were administered at T1, T3, T6, T12, T18, and T24. At T12 also the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form (WAI-S) was filled-in by participants and compared between groups. In the one-year follow-up the SB-APP group did not receive any individual psychological support. MHS was specifically trained in BPD treatment and had regular supervisions. Scores of the CGI, GAF, and STAXI improved after 6 and 12 months, irrespective of treatment. SB-APP group displayed a better outcome for impulsivity, suicide attempts, chronic feelings of emptiness and disturbed relationships. The results displayed a good stabilization during follow-up year even after the interruption of psychotherapy in the SB-APP group. Even though the TAU for BPD applied to heavy MSH users displayed some efficacy in reducing symptom expression and improving global functioning, the adjunct of a specific time-limited and focused psychotherapeutic treatment reached a better outcome. In particular the possibility of a focus on patients' personality functioning (SB-APP) with a specific psychotherapeutic approach seemed to be more effective than the general support to social impairment offered by the TAU approach.

Conditions

Heavy MHS Use; General Psychopathology; Working Alliance

Keywords

BPD; MHS; heavy users; sequential psychotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• MHS heavy use

  requiring more than 6 emergency interventions per year

  2 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• psychopathological improvement

  2 years

Study Arms (2)

SB-APP Psychotherapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients, who signed the informed consent, were randomly assigned to SB-APP in addition to TAU (n=18) or to TAU alone (n=17) groups. The SB-APP group received the usual treatment plus SB-APP (40 weekly sessions) for 10 or 11 months. At the term of the first year (T12) the TAU group continued with the TAU management with supportive weekly session whilst the SB-APP group was carried on with the psychiatric, nurse, educational management without any individual psychological support. The number of sessions performed by the two groups in the first year (T0-T12) was programmed to be almost the same to reduce the number of sessions bias comparing the specific quality of treatments.

Other: SB-APP

TAU treatment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This treatment consisted in a combination of medication, unstructured psychological support focused on socio-relational impairment and rehabilitative interventions provided by nurses and educators. The medication was administered according to the APA guidelines \[18\] for good clinical practice with regard to BPD.

Other: treatment as usual

Interventions

SB-APP OTHER

SB-APP, derived from Brief-Adlerian Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (B-APP) is a time-limited (40 weekly sessions) psychodynamic psychotherapy based on Alfred Adler's theory and delivered in sequential and repeatable modules. SB-APP is focused specifically on four personality functioning levels (PFL). These are assessed by the therapists on the basis of symptoms, quality of interpersonal relationships, overall social behaviors, cognitive and emotional patterns, and defense mechanisms

SB-APP Psychotherapy

treatment as usual OTHER

This treatment consisted in a combination of medication, unstructured psychological support focused on socio-relational impairment and rehabilitative interventions provided by nurses and educators.

TAU treatment

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years - 50 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University of Turin, Italy: lead

Related Publications (2)

• Storebo OJ, Stoffers-Winterling JM, Vollm BA, Kongerslev MT, Mattivi JT, Jorgensen MS, Faltinsen E, Todorovac A, Sales CP, Callesen HE, Lieb K, Simonsen E. Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 4;5(5):CD012955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2.

  PMID: 32368793 DERIVED

• Amianto F, Ferrero A, Piero A, Cairo E, Rocca G, Simonelli B, Fassina S, Abbate-Daga G, Fassino S. Supervised team management, with or without structured psychotherapy, in heavy users of a mental health service with borderline personality disorder: a two-year follow-up preliminary randomized study. BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Nov 21;11:181. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-181.

  PMID: 22103890 DERIVED

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Therapeutics

Study Officials

• Federico Amianto, MD

  University of Torino

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

• Andrea Ferrero, MD

  ASL TO-04 Chivasso (TO)

  STUDY DIRECTOR

• Secondo Fassino, MD

  University of Torino

  STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: May 16, 2011
• First Posted: May 19, 2011
• Study Start: January 1, 2004
• Primary Completion: January 1, 2008
• Study Completion: January 1, 2008
• Last Updated: May 19, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-05