Immune Response of Individuals Vaccinated With Hypoallergenic Derivatives of the Major Birch Pollen Allergen, Bet v 1
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The only disease-modifying treatment for allergic disorders nowadays is allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT). To induce hyporesponsiveness increasing doses of the disease-eliciting allergens are applied. One major problem of this treatment is, that it has to combat with an already established immune response against the disease-eliciting allergen. To circumvent this problem the investigators want to perform the proof of principle study towards prophylactic treatment. Prophylactic vaccination is used since many years for many infectious diseases. The investigators want to adopt this successful principle for the treatment of type I allergies. For this purpose non-allergic healthy individuals will be immunized with adjuvant-bound hypoallergenic derivatives of the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1. As usual for allergen-specific immunotherapy, injections will be applied subcutaneously. Three injections in one-monthly intervals will be given to establish the immune response and a further injection after one year will determine how the vaccine-induced immune response can be boosted. The vaccine will be composed of an equimolar mixture of two adjuvant-bound hypoallergenic derivatives of the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1. The first investigational product (IP) designated as Bet v 1aF1 is a protein of 73 amino acid residues and represents the first half (1-73aa) of the Bet v 1 molecule. The second IP, Bet v 1aF2, is a protein of 86 amino acid residues and represents the second half (74-160aa) of Bet v 1. Both proteins are expressed in Escherichia coli. The hypoallergenic derivatives lost their IgE binding capacities by the disruption of the conformational IgE epitopes of the Bet v 1 molecule. In several preclinical and clinical studies it has been shown that the two hypoallergenic fragments, Bet v 1aF1 and Bet v 1aF2 have a strongly reduced allergenic reactivity and almost no sensitization potential, requisite for a prophylactic treatment. In a multi-centre placebo-controlled double blind clinical trial including 124 allergic patients no relevant sensitization against new epitopes could be observed after vaccination of the Alum-bound Bet v 1 derivatives. In contrast, the vaccine induced a strong IgG response in animals as well as in clinical studies. Vaccine-induced antibodies showed protective properties as they could inhibit the binding of allergic patients' IgE. An improvement of clinical symptoms and a reduction of the skin reactivity was correlated with an increase of IgG antibodies and could be shown only in actively treated patients in a multi-centre placebo-controlled double blind clinical trial. The investigational products will be tested in a Phase I clinical trial for prophylactic allergy vaccination in healthy non-allergic subjects. The two IPs will be coupled either to Alum and an equimolar mixture will be injected subcutaneously. The immune responses will be compared to placebo. In total 20 non-allergic healthy male subjects (10 per group) will be included in this clinical trial. For safety precautions the subjects will be monitored by skin prick testing using the two uncoupled IPs and commercial birch pollen extract in short intervals to recognize possible vaccine-induced sensitizations. The primary endpoint of phase I clinical trial is the evolution of Bet v 1-specific and Bet v 1 fragment-specific IgG1-4, IgE and IgM antibody levels in serum and in nasal fluids after vaccination of rBet v 1 derivatives.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Aug 2011
Typical duration for phase_1
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedMay 16, 2011
April 1, 2011
1 year
May 9, 2011
May 12, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evolution of Bet v 1-, and Bet v 1- fragments -specific total serum IgG antibody levels after vaccination with the Bet v 1-derivatives.
Measurement of vaccination-induced Bet v 1-, and Bet v 1- fragments -specific serum IgG antibody
after 12 months and after 24 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Evolution of Bet v 1-, and Bet v 1- fragments -specific serum IgM, IgA, IgE and IgG1-4 antibody levels after vaccination with the Bet v 1-derivatives
after 12 months and after 24 months
Evolution of Bet v 1-, and Bet v 1- fragments -specific IgM, IgA, IgE and IgG1-4 antibody levels after vaccination with the Bet v 1-derivatives in nasal fluids
after 12 months and after 24 months
Identification of epitope-specificity and magnitude of the immune response and its possible dependence on the subjects' HLA background
after 12 months and after 24 months
Determination of the capacity of treatment-induced antibodies to inhibit the binding of IgE from Bet v 1-sensitized patient to Bet v 1 wildtype.
after 12 months and after 24 months
Determination if vaccination with hypoallergenic Bet v 1 derivatives induces skin reactivity to natural, birch pollen-derived Bet v 1 by skin prick testing
after 12 months and after 24 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Bet v 1aF1 + Bet v 1aF2 -Alum
ACTIVE COMPARATORAlum-Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
subcutaneous injection of equimolar mixture (20µg each) of Bet v 1aF1-Alum and Bet v 1aF2-Alum, three times in monthly intervals and a booster injection after one year
subcutaneous injection of Alum-Placebo, three times in monthly intervals and a booster injection after one year
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: 18 to 50 years
- Male
- No history of allergy
- Negative skin prick tests for birch pollen and Bet v 1-fragments
- Negative IgE for birch pollen and rBet v 1, mugwort pollen house dust mite, cat, alder pollen, hazel pollen, timothy grass pollen
- Healthy individuals according to history, physical examination and routine laboratory findings
- Capable of giving informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form
- Available to complete the study
You may not qualify if:
- History of drug or other allergy
- Autoimmune disease, immune-defects including immuno-suppression, immune complex-induced immunopathies
- Contra-indication for adrenaline
- Long-term treatment with systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs, tranquilizers or psychoactive drugs
- Active tuberculosis
- Multiple sclerosis
- Severe psychological disorders
- The subject has participated in a study involving an investigational drug within 90 days prior to visit 1
- The subject is concurrently and within 6 months participating in another clinical study in which the subject is or will be exposed to an investigational or a non-investigational drug
- The subject has donated a unit of blood (450ml) within the previous three months
- Has a positive history for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies or active hepatitis B or C
- The subject is at risk of non-compliance with the study procedures/restrictions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medical University of Viennalead
- Allergy Centre Vienna Westcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Pathophysiology
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Allergiezentrum Wien West
Vienna, 1150, Austria
Related Publications (2)
Niederberger V, Horak F, Vrtala S, Spitzauer S, Krauth MT, Valent P, Reisinger J, Pelzmann M, Hayek B, Kronqvist M, Gafvelin G, Gronlund H, Purohit A, Suck R, Fiebig H, Cromwell O, Pauli G, van Hage-Hamsten M, Valenta R. Vaccination with genetically engineered allergens prevents progression of allergic disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 5;101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):14677-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404735101. Epub 2004 Aug 13.
PMID: 15310844BACKGROUNDCampana R, Marth K, Zieglmayer P, Weber M, Lupinek C, Zhernov Y, Elisyutina O, Khaitov M, Rigler E, Westritschnig K, Berger U, Wolkersdorfer M, Horak F Jr, Horak F, Valenta R. Vaccination of nonallergic individuals with recombinant hypoallergenic fragments of birch pollen allergen Bet v 1: Safety, effects, and mechanisms. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Mar;143(3):1258-1261. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Nov 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 30471304DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Friedrich Horak, MD
Allergiezentrum Wien West
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rudolf Valenta, MD
Medical University of Vienna
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2011
First Posted
May 16, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
May 16, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-04