Study Stopped
Primary endpoint (HSP) could not be analyzed with the specified method in the planned interim analysis; a method of increased sensitivity had to be established.
Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of Alanyl-Glutamine-Dipeptide to Dialysis Solution in Peritoneal Dialysis
An Open Label, Randomized, Two-Period Crossover Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of Alanyl-Glutamine-Dipeptide to Dialysis Solutions in Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) (Ala-Gln in PD)
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a cost effective and safe form of renal replacement therapy in patients suffering from end stage renal disease. However currently available PDF (peritoneal dialysis fluids) are not biocompatible for the peritoneal cavity and its cells. Acute cytotoxic effects of the majority of the current glucose-based PDF are caused by low pH, lactate, high glucose and its degradation products (GDP). Toxic effects of PDF can thus be extended to suppression of mesothelial HSR (heat shock reactions) following PDF exposure resulting in increased susceptibility of mesothelial cells against PDF exposure: PDF inherent stress factors fail to adequately induce HSP as effectors of the cellular stress response - the adequate HRS rather seems to be blocked. Hence, therapeutic approaches to activate and enhance the HSR will reduce peritoneal damage and organ failure and improve the survival of organisms. Preclinical results demonstrated that supplementation of PDF with pharmacological doses of alanyl-glutamine restored HSP expression and increased the resistance of mesothelial cells in in-vitro models of PD and preserved peritoneal integrity in in-vivo models of PD. After these positive preclinical results, this study shall now clarify, whether the addition of alanyl-glutamine to the most commonly used glucose-based PDF is safe and tolerable. Therefore PDFs will be drained in a randomized cross-over study. Main outcomes measures will be total HSP expression in peritoneal cells and changes of the peritoneal transport kinetics and the presence/absence/severity of side effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Apr 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 13, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedSeptember 11, 2015
September 1, 2015
11 months
May 5, 2011
September 9, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary Endpoint: Total heat shock expression in peritoneal cells from dialysate samples;
In this study, an increase of total heat shock protein expression will be detected in cells from the peritoneal effluent at 240 min by staining of the cytospin and by Western blot analysis of the cellular pellet of the effluent. Total heat shock expression from dialysate samples is calculated in percent.
up to 70 days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Clinical PET-test to measure specific transport kinetics in peritoneal cells (creatinine, urea, sodium, potassium, phosphor, glucose, protein)
up to 70 days
Cell number in peritoneal effluent;
up to 70 days
cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, TNFα);
up to 70 days
Cell function (phagocytosis and cytokine production)
up to 70 days
Morphology of peritoneal cells from effluent (cell culture)
up to 70 days
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm A
OTHERArm A includes 14 patients. In treatment period 1, arm A receives standard PDF with the interventional drug alanyl-glutamine-dipeptide as add-on. As it is a cross-over study design, in treatment period 2, group A receives standard PDF without add-on.
Arm B
OTHERArm B includes 14 patients who in treatment period 1 receive standard PDF without the investigational drug. As it is a cross-over study design, in treatment period 2 arm B receives standard PDF with alanyl-glutamine-dipeptide as add-on.
Interventions
Two arms (A and B) and two treatment periods (1 and 2) are scheduled for this study. Each arm includes 14 patients. Schedule arm A: Treatment period 1 with one single peritoneal dialysis exchange (standard PD solution) with Alanyl-Glutamine-Dipeptide as add-on. 17,4 ml Dipeptiven (=3,48g N(2)-L Alanyl-L-Glutamin) will be dissolved at a final concentration of 0,174 %(= 8 mmol/l) in 2 liters of Dianeal®PD4 (at PH:5,5; Glucose-Concentration 3,86 %). After a wash out period (28 days + max 7 days), arm A undergoes treatment period 2, that is one single peritoneal dialysis exchange with standard PD solution without Alanyl-Glutamine-Dipeptide. Schedule Arm B: Treatment period 1 with one single peritoneal dialysis exchange with standard PD solution without Alanyl-Glutamine-Dipeptide followed by wash-out. Treatment period 2 for arm B includes one single peritoneal dialysis exchange with standard PD solution with Alanyl-Glutamine-Dipeptide as add-on. Dosages remain exactly the same.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent prior to any study-mandated procedure
- Male and female patients aged ≥ 19 years old
- Chronic renal failure; 2 months stable on PD
- no peritonitis within the previous 2 months
- Without severe concomitant disease
- Negative pregnancy test in female patients of childbearing potential and adequate contraception in female patients of childbearing age
You may not qualify if:
- Known hypersensitivity to study medication
- Treatment with another investigational drug within 1 month prior to start of study medication
- Malignancy requiring chemotherapy or radiation
- Pregnancy or nursing,
- Presumed non-compliance
- Limited efficacy of peritoneal dialysis due to anatomical anomalies or severe intra-abdominal adhesions
- Clinical significant inflammatory parameters
- Less than 50 kg body weight
- Immunosuppressive therapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Internal Medicine III; Clinical Division of Nephrology and Dialysis; Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Christoph Aufricht, Univ.Prof.Dr.
Medical University of Vienna
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ao.Univ.-Prof. Dr.med.univ.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2011
First Posted
May 13, 2011
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
March 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
September 11, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-09