Switch to Unboosted Atazanavir With Tenofovir Study
SUAT
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A drug-drug interaction between the anti-HIV drugs tenofovir DF (TDF) and atazanavir (ATZ) results in lower ATZ plasma levels when the drugs are given together, particularly in patients not taking ritonavir to boost ATZ levels. Lower plasma drug levels may make the anti-HIV regimen less effective in controlling the HIV virus levels in the blood. For this reason, current treatment guidelines recommend that ATZ always be boosted with ritonavir in regimens also containing TDF. However, withdrawal of ritonavir is often desirable given the tolerability and toxicity issues with this agent, even at the low dose (100 mg daily) used to boost ATZ. For example, ritonavir can cause stomach upset, nausea, diarrhea, high cholesterol levels, and liver enzyme abnormalities. However, there is evidence that plasma ATZ levels may not predict treatment success on unboosted ATZ regimens, particularly among people whose plasma HIV virus is already under control and unboosted ATZ is being used as a maintenance strategy. In the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS Drug Treatment Program (DTP), nearly 100 patients originally treated with ritonavir-boosted ATZ + TDF (+ FTC or 3TC) are receiving successful maintenance therapy with unboosted ATZ and the same TDF-based backbone. The study will examine the hypothesis that switching to maintenance therapy with unboosted ATZ 400mg daily will have similar 48-week virologic efficacy to continuing ATZ/ritonavir 300/100mg daily among HIV-infected adults with stable viral load suppression on regimens comprising ATZ/ritonavir 300/100mg daily with TDF plus either FTC or 3TC, despite potentially lower ATZ trough levels with the unboosted regimen. In other words, patients whose HIV viral load is undetectable while receiving TDF (+FTC or 3TC) and ATZ/ritonavir will continue to maintain an undetectable viral load after switching to unboosted ATZ without ritonavir, in the same proportions as those continuing on their boosted ATZ/ritonavir regimen.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jul 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 30, 2018
CompletedJuly 30, 2018
October 1, 2017
3.5 years
May 9, 2011
October 24, 2017
October 24, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportions of Subjects Experiencing Virologic Failure by Randomized Treatment Arm
For the purposes of the study, virologic failure is defined as either regimen change for any reason, or plasma viral load \>400 copies/mL on 2 consecutive measurements \>2 weeks apart.
at or before 48 weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Proportions of Subjects in Each Randomized Treatment Arm With Atazanavir Trough Levels Below 150ng/mL
1 month (4-8 weeks)
Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Virologic Failure by Results of 1-month TDM
at or before 48 weeks
Proportions of Subjects Experiencing Virologic Failure by Randomized Treatment Arm
at or before 24 weeks.
Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Virologic Failure by Results of 1-month TDM
at or before 24 weeks
CD4 Cell Count Changes (Absolute and Fraction)
24 and 48 weeks
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Switch
EXPERIMENTALswitch to unboosted atazanavir 400mg daily with the same nucleoside (NRTI) backbone
Continuation
ACTIVE COMPARATORcontinue on current regimen of atazanavir/ritonavir 300mg/100mg with the same nucleoside (NRTI) backbone
Interventions
Continue current regimen of atazanavir 300 mg/ ritonavir 100 mg daily
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- HIV infected adults at least 19 years of age
- Willing and able to provide informed consent to study participation
- Currently receiving a regimen including atazanavir 300mg/ritonavir 100mg daily with either tenofovir/emtricitabine (FTC) or tenofovir/lamivudine (3TC), for at least 3 months
- Plasma viral load (VL) \<40 copies/mL for at least 2 consecutive measurements including the screening value, and \< 150 copies/mL continuously for at least 3 months prior to screening
- Current regimen is first antiretroviral regimen, or if not first regimen, no evidence of resistance to any nucleosides (NRTIs) or protease inhibitors (PIs) on previous resistance tests
- Any CD4
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically significant intolerance or toxicity with current regimen precluding regimen continuation (e.g. intolerance/toxicity to ritonavir necessitating ritonavir discontinuation)
- pregnancy or breast-feeding
- antiretroviral regimen including any nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (nevirapine, efavirenz, or etravirine)
- antiretroviral regimen including any protease inhibitor other than atazanavir and ritonavir
- concomitant treatment with proton pump inhibitors, rifampin, St. John's wort, or garlic supplements. (Antacids and H2 receptor antagonists will be allowed provided their dosing is separated from atazanavir administration by at least 2 and 10 hours, respectively).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Immunodeficiency Clinic, St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z1Y6, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Harris M, Ganase B, Watson B, Hull MW, Guillemi SA, Zhang W, Saeedi R, Harrigan PR. Efficacy and safety of "unboosting" atazanavir in a randomized controlled trial among HIV-infected patients receiving tenofovir DF. HIV Clin Trials. 2017 Jan;18(1):39-47. doi: 10.1080/15284336.2016.1271503. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
PMID: 28067119RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Marianne Harris
- Organization
- British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marianne Harris, MD
Providence Health Care/ University of British Columbia
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Marianne Harris
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2011
First Posted
May 11, 2011
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 30, 2018
Results First Posted
July 30, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-10