Clinical Characteristics of Spinal Levobupivacaine: Hyperbaric Compared With Isobaric Solution
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The authors would like to investigate the blocking characteristics, surgical quality and side effects of intrathecal levobupivacaine whether there are any differences between the hyperbaric and the isobaric formulation for gynaecologic surgeries which need higher block level than the urological surgeries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2007
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2007
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 9, 2011
CompletedNovember 7, 2013
November 1, 2013
1.1 years
May 5, 2011
November 5, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
time to T4-dermatome sensory blockade
to investigate specific blocking characteristics of intrathecal hyperbaric levobupivacaine compared with isobaric levobupivacaine for gynaecologic surgery
30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
side effects
1 to 4 hours intraoperation plus within 2 hours in the recovery room
Study Arms (2)
isobaric levobupivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORspinal isobaric levobupivacaine
hyperbaric levobupivacaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORhyperbaric levobupivacaine
Interventions
0.42% either isobaric levobupivacaine 3 ml spinal injection once
0.42% hyperbaric levobupivacaine 3 ml spinal injection once
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA I-III, aged 18-70 yr, scheduled for elective gynaecologic surgery, (total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), TAH with uni-/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (SO), uni-/bilateral ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy
You may not qualify if:
- contraindications for spinal block, body mass index (BMI) more than 35 kg/m2 and height less than 150 cm
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vimolluck - Sanansilp, MD
Dept of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2011
First Posted
May 9, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2007
Primary Completion
February 1, 2008
Study Completion
February 1, 2008
Last Updated
November 7, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11