NCT01349465

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate durability of SVR in chronic HCV patients who achieved SVR in the previous study with TMC435-containing regimen and time for resistance associated mutations to return to baseline in chronic HCV patients who did not achieve SVR in the previous study with TMC435-containing regimen.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
249

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2011

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
7 countries

48 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 26, 2011

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 6, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 4, 2011

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 5, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 5, 2016

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 16, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

April 10, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

4.5 years

First QC Date

April 26, 2011

Results QC Date

December 23, 2016

Last Update Submit

March 10, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Hepatitis CHepatitisTMC435Liver diseaseVirus Infection

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Percentage of Participants Maintaining SVR at the Last Available Visit

    The SVR rate is the proportion (%) of participants with HCV RNA less than (\<) 25 International Units/milliliter (IU/mL).

    Last Available Visit (Month 36 for subjects completing the study)

  • Overall Percentage of Participants With Change in Sequence of HCV NS3/4A Region Over Time in Participants With Confirmed Detectable HCV RNA at the Last Visit of the Previous Study

    Sequencing was performed to assess changes in the sequence of the HCV NS3/4A protein region over time in participants with no SVR at LPVPS (ie confirmed detectable HCV RNA at the last visit of the previous study). EOS defined as last available sequencing sample. AEM and NEM represents any emerging mutation and no emerging mutation at time of failure of the previous study.

    Baseline and Month 36

  • Percentage of Participants With Change in Sequence of HCV NS3/4A Region Over Time in Participants With Confirmed Detectable HCV RNA (With Q80K at Baseline) at the Last Visit of the Previous Study

    Sequencing was performed to assess changes in the sequence of the HCV NS3/4A protein region over time in participants with no SVR at LPVPS (ie confirmed detectable HCV RNA at the last visit of the previous study). EOS defined as last available sequencing sample. AEM and NEM represents any emerging mutation and no emerging mutation at time of failure of the previous study.

    Baseline and Month 36

  • Percentage of Participants With Change in Sequence of HCV NS3/4A Region Over Time in Participants With Confirmed Detectable HCV RNA (Without Q80K at Baseline) at the Last Visit of the Previous Study

    Sequencing was performed to assess changes in the sequence of the HCV NS3/4A protein region over time in participants with no SVR at LPVPS (ie confirmed detectable HCV RNA at the last visit of the previous study). EOS defined as last available sequencing sample. AEM and NEM represents any emerging mutation and no emerging mutation at time of failure of the previous study.

    Baseline and Month 36

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Participants With Late Viral Relapse

    End of study (at month 36)

  • Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    End of study (at month 36)

Study Arms (2)

Group 1: TMC 435 - Patients With SVR at LPVPS

OTHER

Patients with sustained virologic response (SVR) who completed last post-therapy follow-up visit of the previous study (LPVPS) \[Phase IIb or Phase III\] in which they received a TMC435-containing regimen for the treatment of HCV infection.

Drug: No treatment

Group 2: TMC 435 - Patients With No SVR at LPVPS

OTHER

Patients with no sustained virologic response (SVR) who completed last post-therapy follow-up visit of the previous study (LPVPS) \[Phase IIb or Phase III\] in which they received a TMC435-containing regimen for the treatment of HCV infection.

Drug: No treatment

Interventions

No treatment was given to patients during this study as this is a follow-up study of previous Phase IIb or Phase III in which they received a TMC435-containing regimen.

Group 1: TMC 435 - Patients With SVR at LPVPSGroup 2: TMC 435 - Patients With No SVR at LPVPS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Have previously participated in a Phase IIb or Phase III study
  • Must have received at least one dose of TMC435 in that study
  • Has completed the last post-therapy follow-up visit of the previous (LPVPS) study

You may not qualify if:

  • Must be currently enrolled or plan to enroll in another study with an investigational drug or invasive investigational medical device
  • Have received antiviral or immunomodulating treatment, including therapeutic vaccines, for hepatitis C virus (HCV) between LPVPS and the screening visit of present study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (48)

Unknown Facility

Bakersfield, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

La Jolla, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Orlando, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Antwerp, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Bruges, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Brussels, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Ghent, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Leuven, Belgium

Location

Unknown Facility

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Montreal, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Créteil, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Grenoble, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Lyon, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Nice, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Paris, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Berlin, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Cologne, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Düsseldorf, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Frankfurt A. M., Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Hamburg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Hanover, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Kiel, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Würzburg, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Bialystok, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Bydgoszcz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Czeladź, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Mysłowice, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Warsaw, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Moscow, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Samara, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Smolensk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Stavropol, Russia

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Zoulim F, Moreno C, Lee SS, Buggisch P, Horban A, Lawitz E, Corbett C, Lenz O, Fevery B, Verbinnen T, Shukla U, Jessner W. A 3-year follow-up study after treatment with simeprevir in combination with pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Virol J. 2018 Jan 30;15(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12985-018-0936-4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis CHepatitisLiver DiseasesVirus Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Blood-Borne InfectionsCommunicable DiseasesInfectionsHepatitis, Viral, HumanFlaviviridae InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsDigestive System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Study Responsible Scientist
Organization
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study Officials

  • Janssen R&D Ireland Clinical Trial

    Janssen R&D Ireland

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2011

First Posted

May 6, 2011

Study Start

July 4, 2011

Primary Completion

January 5, 2016

Study Completion

January 5, 2016

Last Updated

April 10, 2017

Results First Posted

February 16, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Locations