Study Stopped
diffculty to include patients
Ligasure II: Standard Stapling Versus Ligasure
Standard Stapling Technique Versus Bipolar Fusion (With The Ligasure Impact and Force Triad Generator) To Complete The Fissure During Major Lung Resection: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
172
1 country
10
Brief Summary
Surgical staplers have become standard for ligation, division, resection, anastomosis and closure in many surgical procedures. Staplers are utilized in thoracic surgery routinely for pulmonary parenchymal resection and closure, ligation of vessels and bronchi. In addition, closure of incomplete fissure/s is a frequent need in pulmonary surgery. Although generally safe and efficacious, staplers and staple loads are expensive, and can result in micro air leaks. The LigaSure Vessel Sealing System presents as a potentially faster and less expensive alternative to staplers. The LigaSure Vessel sealing system utilizes a combination of heat generated via bi-polar radiofrequency energy and precise jaw pressure to denature the collagen and elastin in tissue and blood vessels. The newly released Force Triad Generator and the Impact, a 10 mm jaw sealing device (Ligasure system, COVIDIEN Society) may offer improved performance in terms of tissue sticking due to an improved sealing algorithm, and to the jaw configuration of the Impact. The study main objective is to compare the quality of parenchymal pneumostasis after fissure closure achieved with staplers vs that achieved with LigaSure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Sep 2010
Typical duration for phase_3
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedJuly 28, 2015
July 1, 2015
4.4 years
May 4, 2011
July 27, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rates of post-operative air leak between the two techniques
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Compare the number of lung stitches between LigaSure device and standard staplers
Day 1
Evaluate the cost of LigaSure vs standard staplers in similar procedures including the cost of each instrument and the staple loads fired.
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
LigaSure
EXPERIMENTAL* Arm 1 * Patients undergoing lung surgery
Automatic Staplers
ACTIVE COMPARATOR* Arm 2 * Patients undergoing lung surgery
Interventions
Quality of parenchymal pneumostasis comparison after fissure closure: LigaSure vs automatic staplers
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients older than 18 years
- Patients scheduled for thoracotomy, lobectomy or bilobectomy
- Patients must give informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
- Patients who can not tolerate thoracotomy
- Patients who require extensive dissection to release adhesions which may result in air leak and/or bleeding unrelated to the quality of the parenchymal seal achieved by the devices in question
- Patients with no parenchymal bridge between lobes; 100% complete fissure.
- Patients with complete incomplete fissure with a thickness \> 1.5 cm measure intraoperatively
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
CHU Lyon-Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiovascular and Chest Hospital
Bron, France
CHU Clermont Ferrand - Service of Thoracic Surgery
Clermont-Ferrand, France
CHU Grenoble - Department of Vascular and Thoracic Surgery
Grenoble, France
CHU Lille - Service of Thoracic Surgery
Lille, France
Hospital Dupuytren - Department of Thoracic and CardioVascular Surgery
Limoges, France
CHU Marseille - Department of Thoracic Surgery
Marseille, France
CHU Nice - Pasteur Hospital - Department of Thoracic Surgery
Nice, France
Chu Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, 42100, France
CHU Strasbourg - Service of Thoracic Surgery
Strasbourg, France
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Larrey, CHU Toulouse
Toulouse, France
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
TIFFET Olivier, MD
CHU Sainte-Etienne
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2011
First Posted
May 6, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
February 1, 2015
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
July 28, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-07