Watchful Waiting Versus Repair of Oligosymptomatic Incisional Hernias
AWARE
Watchful Waiting vs. Repair of Oligosymptomatic Incisional Hernias
1 other identifier
interventional
636
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Watchful waiting is non-inferior to surgical repair of asymptomatic and oligosymptomatic incisional hernias in terms of pain and discomfort during normal activities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2021
CompletedFebruary 13, 2024
February 1, 2024
9.6 years
May 5, 2011
February 10, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain/ discomfort during normal activities
Pain/ discomfort during normal activities as a result of the hernia or hernia operation 2 years after enrolment measured by the hernia-specific Surgical Pain Scale (SPS) on a 150 mm-scale ranging from "no pain sensation" to "most intense pain imaginable".
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Patient satisfaction with care (5 point Likert scale)
24 months
Pain/discomfort at rest /pain during sports /maximal pain
24 months
Pain Disability Index
24 months
Quality of Life (SF-36)
24 months
Frequency of acute incarcerations
24 months
Study Arms (2)
watchful waiting
EXPERIMENTALAfter informed consent and randomization into the watchful waiting group patients will receive standardized verbal information and written instructions on symptoms of acute incarceration. In case of acute symptoms they will be told to visit a physician immediately. On follow-up visits at 1 month, 12 months and 24 months the hernia size will be determined by physical examination, and the pain/ discomfort and the functional status will be monitored. Control intervention/ reference test: Open or laparoscopic hernia repair with mesh (non-absorbable or partly-absorbable alloplastic material) or with direct suture repair. For hernias measuring ≥ 3 cm mesh repair is recommended. A wide overlap of the mesh over the fascia margin on each side has to be provided. Divergent types of repair are permitted but have to be documented.
Hernia repair
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntervention: Open or laparoscopic hernia repair with mesh (non-absorbable or partly-absorbable alloplastic material) or with direct suture repair. For hernias measuring ≥ 3 cm mesh repair is recommended. A wide overlap of the mesh over the fascia margin on each side has to be provided. Divergent types of repair are permitted but have to be documented.
Interventions
Watchful waiting means the observation of the hernia. The patient is informed about signs of deterioration or incarceration. The hernia is controlled clinically on defined follow-up visits.
Open or laparoscopic hernia repair with mesh (non-absorbable or partly-absorbable alloplastic material) or with direct suture repair. For hernias measuring ≥ 3 cm mesh repair is recommended. A wide overlap of the mesh over the fascia margin on each side has to be provided. These are all standard techniques in incisional hernia repair.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age ≥18 years
- asymptomatic/ oligosymptomatic incisional hernia
You may not qualify if:
- no hernia detectable by physical examination
- acute incarcerated hernia
- emergency hernia repair
- pain or discomfort associated with the hernia during normal activities
- local or systemic infection
- ASA score \>3
- inability to complete or comprehend the preoperative questionnaire
- repair with biologic prothesis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Charite University, Berlin, Germanylead
- German Research Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin
Berlin, 12200, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Lauscher JC, Martus P, Stroux A, Neudecker J, Behrens U, Hammerich R, Buhr HJ, Ritz JP. Development of a clinical trial to determine whether watchful waiting is an acceptable alternative to surgical repair for patients with oligosymptomatic incisional hernia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012 Feb 7;13:14. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-14.
PMID: 22314130DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Johannes C Lauscher, M. D.
Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2011
First Posted
May 6, 2011
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2021
Study Completion
June 1, 2021
Last Updated
February 13, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP