Study Cyclosporine (CsA) Versus Tacrolimus (Tacro) After Campath Induction in Kidney Transplantation
RSCS-Campath
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing CsA Versus Tacro After Campath Induction In Kidney Transplant Recipients
1 other identifier
observational
170
1 country
1
Brief Summary
After alemtuzumab induction, followed with kidney transplantation, patients will be randomly assigned to receive either tacrolimus or cyclosporine microemulsion in combination with mycophenolates. Patients will be followed including protocol biopsy at 1, 12, 36, 60 month posttransplant, regular nuclein acid testing (NAT) for cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and BK virus (BKV) in urine and blood. The investigation is undertaken to clarify the reason for equal survival rates for patients on cyclosporine and tacrolimus despite the lower rejection rate on tacrolimus.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2009
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 29, 2016
CompletedNovember 29, 2016
October 1, 2016
4.1 years
July 7, 2010
October 4, 2016
October 4, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Patient Survival
in cyclosporine group 96.4 +/- 2.8%; in tacrolimus group 96.3 +/- 3.4%
5 years
Graft Survival
in cyclosporine group 84.6 +/- 5.8%; in tacrolimus group 86.2 +/- 4.1%
5 years
Study Arms (2)
cyclosporine group
cyclosporine group - after alemtuzumab induction cyclosporine was administered
tacrolimus group
tacrolimus group - after alemtuzumab induction tacrolimus was administered
Interventions
after alemtuzumab, cyclosporine or tacrolimus was administered
Eligibility Criteria
Recipients of kidney allograft who underwent previous Campath induction and do receive calcineurine inhibitor (CNI)
You may qualify if:
- first kidney allograft recipients
- alemtuzumab induction
You may not qualify if:
- CNI intolerance
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Research Centre of Surgery
Moscow, 119992, Russia
Biospecimen
blood and urine, taken at the time of protocol or case biopsies will be deeply freeze and stocked for future examination for NAT or other molecules - candidates for diagnostic markers.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Michael Kaabak
- Organization
- Boris Petrovsky research cener od surgery
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael M Kaabak, professor
Russian Scientific Center of Surgery RAMS
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 10 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2010
First Posted
May 3, 2011
Study Start
April 1, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 29, 2016
Results First Posted
November 29, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10