Sponsor study identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Study Start
April 2011
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
February 2012
Actual (reported)Study Completion
February 2012
Actual (reported)The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and the safety of T1210 versus Olopatadine eye drops in the topical treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
February 2012
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
April 2011
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
April 21, 2011
Actual (reported)April 28, 2011
Actual (reported)February 2012
Actual (reported)February 2012
Actual (reported)Change from baseline of the score of tearing
Day 28
Change from baseline of the score of itching
Day 28
Change from baseline of the score of conjunctival hyperaemia
Day 28
Global local tolerance assessment by the Investigator and the patient
Day 7
Global local tolerance assessment by the Investigator and the patient
Day 28
2 drops T1210 once a day
2 drops once a day Olopatadine
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Pierre Huguet
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France
First Submitted
April 21, 2011
First Posted
April 28, 2011
Study Start
April 2011
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
February 2012
Actual (reported)Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Study Completion
February 2012
Actual (reported)Last Updated
April 12, 2012
Record last verified: 2011-04
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: