Safety and Effectiveness Study of the AO-1000 Device to Treat Contained Herniated Discs
A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Ozone Generated and Injected by the AO-1000 Device in the Treatment of Contained Herniated Discs
1 other identifier
interventional
39
1 country
3
Brief Summary
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the AO-1000 device to treat and relieve the pain of symptomatic subjects with contained herniated discs. This single-arm pilot study will be used as a go vs. no-go decision on performing a randomized-controlled trial. The study's primary effectiveness objective is to demonstrate that the patient's functionality (based on Oswestry Disability Index scores) has improved from baseline at one month. The study's primary safety objective is to demonstrate that serious device/procedure related adverse events and subsequent surgical interventions are no greater than those in a literature control of other percutaneous disc decompression procedures at discharge, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months post-treatment. Secondary objectives are to demonstrate procedural success and improvement in the pain and function of the subjects at 1, 6, and 12 months using the VAS and ODI scales as well as tracking analgesic medication use. Pain and function scores for each follow-up time will be compared to the baseline scores.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Aug 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_1
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2016
CompletedJuly 15, 2016
July 1, 2016
4.7 years
April 19, 2011
July 13, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Change from Baseline ODI Score at 1 Month
Mean change from baseline ODI score, analyzed at 1 month. The endpoint will be deemed successful if the mean improvement is statistically shown (p\<0.05) to be at least 15 points (the minimum detectable change of the ODI).
1 month post-treatment
Primary Safety Endpoint: Frequency of Serious Adverse Events Compared to Literature Control
The endpoint will be deemed successful if the number of serious device/procedure related adverse events are statistically shown (p\<0.05) to be no greater than those in a literature control of other percutaneous disc decompression procedures.
12 months post-treatment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Functional improvement
6 and 12 months post-treatment
Leg and Back Pain Improvement
1, 6, and 12 months post-treatment
Procedural Success
Time of Treatment
Analgesic Medication Use
1, 6, and 12 months post-treatment
Study Arms (1)
AO-1000 Treatment
EXPERIMENTALOxygen-ozone treatment with the AO-1000 device
Interventions
Mixture of 2 weight% ozone in 98 weight% oxygen injected into the nucleus pulposus of a contained herniated disc.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- to 70 years of age
- Herniated disc between L1 and S1 evident on diagnostic imaging
- Sciatica with or without lower back pain for \> 3 months
- Failure to improve with non-operative care (Conservative treatment failure)
- Sciatica with or without lower back pain exacerbated by sitting and/or standing with recumbent relief
- A preoperative leg or back VAS (pain) score between 40 and 90 mm on a 100 mm scale. (moderate to severe pain)
- A preoperative ODI (function) score between 40 and 90 (moderate to severe functional disability)
- Able and willing to return for the follow-up evaluations
- The pain must be consistent with the dermatome pattern and must be clearly identifiable to the herniated disc.
You may not qualify if:
- Functional neurological deficit evident during neurological exam
- Previous spine surgery in the lumbar region or adjacent to the disc of interest
- Cord compression or cauda equine syndrome
- Structural deformities (e.g. spondylolisthesis, greater than a mild degree of non-discogenic vertebral canal stenosis, greater than a mild degree of scoliosis, spinal fracture, disc herniations \> 4 mm, sequestered herniation)
- Extruded/free disc fragment
- Calcified disc fragment
- Disc height loss \> 75%
- Inaccessible disc due to, for example, overlap of the iliac wings, and/or steep angulation of the L5/S1 disc space
- Coagulopathy evident on blood sample testing
- Platelet count \< 50,000
- International Normalized Ratio (INR) \> 1.4
- Partial Thromboplastin Time (PTT) \> 1.3
- White blood cell count (WBCC) \> 12,000
- Infection as evidenced by subject clinical evaluation, history, and blood test
- Any evidence of osteomyelitis/discitis at any level
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- ActiveO Inc.lead
Study Sites (3)
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
University of Western Ontario - London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6H 5A5, Canada
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada
Related Publications (8)
Steppan J, Meaders T, Muto M, Murphy KJ. A metaanalysis of the effectiveness and safety of ozone treatments for herniated lumbar discs. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Apr;21(4):534-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.12.393. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
PMID: 20188591BACKGROUNDPellicanĂ² G, Martinelli F, Tavanti V, et al. The Italian Oxygen-Ozone Therapy Federation (FIO) Study on Oxygen-Ozone Treatment of Herniated Disc. Int J Ozone Ther 6:7-15, 2007.
BACKGROUNDOder B, Loewe M, Reisegger M, Lang W, Ilias W, Thurnher SA. CT-guided ozone/steroid therapy for the treatment of degenerative spinal disease--effect of age, gender, disc pathology and multi-segmental changes. Neuroradiology. 2008 Sep;50(9):777-85. doi: 10.1007/s00234-008-0398-2. Epub 2008 May 16.
PMID: 18483728BACKGROUNDMixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med 211:210-215, 1934.
BACKGROUNDAndreula CF, Simonetti L, De Santis F, Agati R, Ricci R, Leonardi M. Minimally invasive oxygen-ozone therapy for lumbar disk herniation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 May;24(5):996-1000.
PMID: 12748111BACKGROUNDAndreula C, Muto M, Leonardi M. Interventional spinal procedures. Eur J Radiol. 2004 May;50(2):112-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.10.013.
PMID: 15081127BACKGROUNDBonetti M, Fontana A, Cotticelli B, Volta GD, Guindani M, Leonardi M. Intraforaminal O(2)-O(3) versus periradicular steroidal infiltrations in lower back pain: randomized controlled study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 May;26(5):996-1000.
PMID: 15891150BACKGROUNDGallucci M, Limbucci N, Zugaro L, Barile A, Stavroulis E, Ricci A, Galzio R, Masciocchi C. Sciatica: treatment with intradiscal and intraforaminal injections of steroid and oxygen-ozone versus steroid only. Radiology. 2007 Mar;242(3):907-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2423051934. Epub 2007 Jan 5.
PMID: 17209164BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2011
First Posted
April 20, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
April 1, 2016
Study Completion
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 15, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07