Laparo-endoscopic Single Site (LESS) Cholecystectomy Versus Standard LAP-CHOLE
LESSCHO
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to assess possible differences between the LESS approach and the standard laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy. In particular, the Postoperative Quality of Life (QoL) will be investigated by analyzing the followings: length of hospital stay (LoS), postoperative pain, cosmetics and the results of SF 36 questionnaire. Furthermore, operative time, conversion to standard LC rate, difficulty of exposure, difficulty of dissection, and complication rate will be compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started May 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedApril 20, 2011
March 1, 2011
1.3 years
March 30, 2011
April 19, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative Quality of Life (QoL)
Postoperative Quality of Life (QoL) will be the primary endpoint: QoL will be assessed analysing the followings: length of hospital stay (LoS), postoperative pain, cosmetics and the results of SF 36 questionnaire.
one month
Secondary Outcomes (5)
operative time
day 1
conversion rate to standard LC
day 1
surgeon perception of difficulty of exposure measured with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with 0 to the least difficult and 5 to the most difficult
day 1
surgeon perception of difficulty of dissection measured with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with 0 to the least difficult and 5 to the most difficult
day 1
complication rate
one month
Study Arms (3)
LESS cholecystectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy, the entire surface of the patient's abdomen is covered by plaster at the end of the operation. Patient does not know which kind of procedure he underwent before discharge.
Standard LAP-CHOLE
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The entire surface of the patient's abdomen is covered by plaster at the end of the operation. Patient does not know which kind of procedure he underwent before discharge.
LESS Cholecystectomy not blind
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy. The patient is aware of the procedure he underwent.
Interventions
Standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy The first cannula is inserted with an "open laparoscopy" technique. LCs are performed with either HF or US energized dissection, standard or fundus-first gallbladder dissection, closure of the artery by ligature/clip or US, closure of cystic duct by ligature/clip. Laparo-endoscopic single site cholecystectomy The TriPort device is inserted at the navel site through a 15 to 25 mm incision with an "open laparoscopy" technique. Two working instruments are inserted (one grasper and one energised device) through the TriPort. A further 1.8 or 3 mm instrument inserted through the larger gel valve, parallel to a 5 mm dissecting instrument, is used in some cases to enhance exposure. Gallbladder dissection is accomplished either after preparation of the cystic duct and artery or with a fundus-first technique, by means of HF electrosurgery or US shears.The cystic artery is divided between clips or by US scissors. The duct is divided between clips.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 18-75
- BMI \< 35
- no previous upper GI or right colonic surgery with severe adhesions gallstones with absence of clinical signs of acute cholecystitis, bile duct stones or pancreatitis.
- ASA I-III
- Nassar grade of difficulty in performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy I-III
- diagnosis: cholelithiasis
You may not qualify if:
- cholecystitis
- existence of common duct stones
- presence of biliary cancer
- Previous abdominal surgery on organs of the supramesocolic space
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
San Giovanni Hospital
Rome, Lazio, 00184, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Steinemann DC, Raptis DA, Lurje G, Oberkofler CE, Wyss R, Zehnder A, Lesurtel M, Vonlanthen R, Clavien PA, Breitenstein S. Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial). BMC Surg. 2011 Sep 12;11:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-24.
PMID: 21910897DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marco Maria Lirici, FACS
San Giovanni Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2011
First Posted
April 20, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 20, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-03