Supporting Parents Program: Intervention for Families in CPS
SPP
Training Social Work Providers: Intervention for Maltreating Families of Infants
2 other identifiers
interventional
270
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of a well-documented relationship-based intervention (Promoting First Relationships), compared to a resource and referral condition, in improving outcomes for families of infants and toddlers referred to Child Protective Services (CPS) for maltreatment. In addition, it evaluates the effectiveness of training community social service workers in providing the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 7, 2018
CompletedJune 7, 2018
May 1, 2018
4.4 years
April 7, 2011
August 9, 2017
May 4, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Child Welfare Outcomes: CWS Removal From Birth Parent Home
Official child welfare administrative records indicating whether child was removed from the birth parent home within one year of parent completing intervention (or one year after estimated date intervention would have been completed, for parents who did not complete). Data were analyzed with a survival model that predicted hazard of being removed from the birth parent home.
1 year post intervention
Parental Sensitivity (Video Recorded Observation Coded by Blind Coders)
Parent sensitivity was measured at all four time points by a modified total score of the Nursing Child Assessment Teaching Scale (NCATS; Barnard, 1994), a videotaped interaction to assess caregiver sensitivity, stimulation of the child, and emotional responsiveness during interaction were scored. The scale was modified to exclude some items from the original measure that demonstrated low variability in other studies. A total score was based on 45 items, possible range 0 - 45. Items covered mutuality (e.g. contingency, gaze, and positive affect), caregiver verbal and nonverbal support of child, and sensitive instruction during the teaching task. Items were scored yes (1) or no (0), and yes scores were summed. Cronbach's alpha for the sensitivity scale ranged from .68 to .72. A single, blinded coder was trained to reliability by a certified NCATS instructor and passed regular reliability checks. Higher scores indicate greater parental sensitivity.
Baseline, post intervention (approximately 4 months from baseline, 3 month follow up (~7 months from baseline), 6 month follow up (~ 10 months from baseline)
Secure Base Behavior (Observation During Research Visit; Higher Score Indicates Greater Security)
Secure base behavior was measured with the Toddler Attachment Sort-45 (TAS-45; Kirkland, Bimler, Drawneek, McKim, \& Schölmerich, 2004). The TAS-45 is based on 39 items from the Attachment Q-Sort (AQS; Waters, 1987), an attachment measure that has been extensively validated (van IJzendoorn, Vereijken, Bakermans-Kranenburg, \& Riksen-Walraven, 2004), plus six items tapping atypical affective communication. After home visits, research visitors sorted cards for 45 descriptive statements of child attachment behavior into five piles representing "most like" to "least like" the child. Item scores were standardized within individuals and then compared to a security profile to arrive at an security score. Higher value indicates greater secure base behavior. Because scores are based standardized item scores weighted by proximity to the secure profile, the possible range is large, difficult to determine, and not reported in the instrument manual. The observed range was from -.62 to +1.00.
Baseline, post intervention (approximately 4 months from baseline, 3 month follow up (~7 months from baseline), 6 month follow up (~ 10 months from baseline)
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Parenting Stress: Dysfunctional Interaction
Baseline, post intervention (approximately 4 months from baseline, 3 month follow up from post intervention (~7 months from baseline), 6 month follow up (~ 10 months from baseline)
Parent Stress: Competence (Higher Score Means More Stress)
Baseline 3-month post-intervention (~7 months post baseline), 6-month follow up (~ ten months post baseline)
Child Social Emotional Development (Higher Scores Indicate More Competence)
Baseline, post intervention (approximately 4 months from baseline, 3 month follow up (~7 months from baseline), 6 month follow up (~ 10 months from baseline)
Child Behavior Problems
Baseline, post intervention (approximately 4 months from baseline, 3 month follow up (~7 months from baseline), 6 month follow up (~ 10 months from baseline)
Child Emotion Regulation
Baseline and at the 3 month follow up (~ 7 months post baseline)
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
EXPERIMENTALPFR is a strengths-based 10 week in-home parenting intervention based on attachment theory. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts which focus on the content area covered that day and applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child. On alternate weeks, the provider watches the video with the parent, reflecting on both the parent's and the child's needs. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
Resource & Referral
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis condition consists of 1) Resource and Referral assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant receives a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist to conduct a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need. The R\&R provider makes two follow-up check in calls with the families. In addition, families can call the Research and Referral Specialist if additional needs arise. The resource packet includes information organized by type of need or resource. These packets are updated regularly as services change over time.
Interventions
PFR is a parenting intervention based on attachment theory and is strengths based. It is a 10 week intervention that is delivered in the home of the family.
Needs assessment, followed with a resource packet sent by mail
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Biological parents and their child aged 10-24 months, who is an identified victim for referral to CPS, and who are parenting their child a majority of the time
- Families served by CPS offices in Snohomish and Skagit counties, in the state of Washington
- Families at moderate to high risk for maltreatment (physical abuse, neglect, or emotional maltreatment) and under investigation by Child Protective Services
- English speaking primary caregiver
- Telephone access
- Current housing
You may not qualify if:
- Experiencing an acute crisis (homelessness, hospitalization, imprisonment)
- Identified child (in a risk only CPS intake) or identified victim (in CPS intakes with allegations) has a voluntary services agreement within 2 weeks of a newly opened investigation
- Identified child (in a risk only CPS intake) or identified victim (in CPS intakes with allegations) has a dependency filing within 2 weeks of a newly opened investigation
- Previously received the Promoting First Relationships intervention
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Washington, Family & Child Nursing
Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States
Related Publications (2)
Oxford ML, Spieker SJ, Lohr MJ, Fleming CB. Promoting First Relationships(R): Randomized Trial of a 10-Week Home Visiting Program With Families Referred to Child Protective Services. Child Maltreat. 2016 Nov;21(4):267-277. doi: 10.1177/1077559516668274. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
PMID: 27646148RESULTJones KA, Freijah I, Brennan SE, McKenzie JE, Bright TM, Fiolet R, Kamitsis I, Reid C, Davis E, Andrews S, Muzik M, Segal L, Herrman H, Chamberlain C. Interventions from pregnancy to two years after birth for parents experiencing complex post-traumatic stress disorder and/or with childhood experience of maltreatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 4;5(5):CD014874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014874.pub2.
PMID: 37146219DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Generalizability limited by sample selection criteria. Follow-up was only 6-months post-intervention for most outcomes although child welfare records covered 1 year post-intervention. Parent report was used for some key outcomes.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Monica Oxford
- Organization
- Family and Child Nursing, University of Washington
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Monica L Oxford, PhD
University of Washington
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2011
First Posted
April 11, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 7, 2018
Results First Posted
June 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share