Influence of Routinely Adding Ultrasound Screening in Medical Department
Influence on Diagnostics and Inpatient Workflow of Routinely Adding Ultrasound Screening by Pocket-size Ultrasound in a Medical Department
1 other identifier
interventional
600
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ultrasound (US) is widely used as a diagnostic tool in a hospital setting. In a medical department, diagnosis like heart failure or most kinds of heart diseases, hypervolemia, hypovolemia, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, ascites, diseases in the gall bladder/bile tract, urine tract and venous thrombosis are common. US is the key diagnostic tool in these diagnosis, and on early diagnosis is crucial with respect to the patients well-being and inpatients workflow. 1\. The aim is to study the clinical use of pocket-size US as a screening diagnostic tool in an medical department with respect to inpatients workflow and diagnostics. Method: Patients admitted (in certain preset periods) to Department of medicine will be randomized to routinely adding an ultrasound examination with pocket-size device by residents on call. Time to definitive diagnosis, time to definitive treatment and time to discard will be recorded. US findings will be validated against standard echocardiography, or standard US/CT/MRI performed at the Radiological department.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedNovember 9, 2021
November 1, 2021
2 months
March 30, 2011
November 5, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to definitive diagnosis
Time from admittance to definitive diagnosis
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Test-retest reproducibility
3 months
Diagnostic outcome of additional ultrasound examination according to educational level of the performer
3 months
Time to definitive treatment
3 months
Time to discharge
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Usual care
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual care diagnostics. No routinely ultrasound examination
Routinely ulasonography
EXPERIMENTALPatients will routinely be examined with ultrasound at admittance in addition to usual care diagnostics
Interventions
Routinely adding a ultrasound examination of the heart, pleura, great abdominal vessels, liver/gall bladder and kidneys at patients admittance to hospital
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients admitted to Dep. of Medicine at Levanger Hospital
You may not qualify if:
- Not able to give informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Medicine, Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Health Trust
Levanger, 7600, Norway
Related Publications (7)
Sicari R, Galderisi M, Voigt JU, Habib G, Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Badano LP. The use of pocket-size imaging devices: a position statement of the European Association of Echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011 Feb;12(2):85-7. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq184. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
PMID: 21216764BACKGROUNDPrinz C, Voigt JU. Diagnostic accuracy of a hand-held ultrasound scanner in routine patients referred for echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Feb;24(2):111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.10.017. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
PMID: 21126857BACKGROUNDRoelandt JR. Ultrasound stethoscopy. Eur J Intern Med. 2004 Oct;15(6):337-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2004.08.002.
PMID: 15522567BACKGROUNDKimura BJ, Shaw DJ, Agan DL, Amundson SA, Ping AC, DeMaria AN. Value of a cardiovascular limited ultrasound examination using a hand-carried ultrasound device on clinical management in an outpatient medical clinic. Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 15;100(2):321-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.02.104. Epub 2007 May 29.
PMID: 17631091BACKGROUNDLucas BP, Candotti C, Margeta B, Evans AT, Mba B, Baru J, Asbury JK, Asmar A, Kumapley R, Patel M, Borkowsky S, Fung S, Charles-Damte M. Diagnostic accuracy of hospitalist-performed hand-carried ultrasound echocardiography after a brief training program. J Hosp Med. 2009 Jul;4(6):340-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.438.
PMID: 19670355BACKGROUNDMartin LD, Howell EE, Ziegelstein RC, Martire C, Whiting-O'Keefe QE, Shapiro EP, Hellmann DB. Hand-carried ultrasound performed by hospitalists: does it improve the cardiac physical examination? Am J Med. 2009 Jan;122(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.07.022.
PMID: 19114170BACKGROUNDMoore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 24;364(8):749-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0909487. No abstract available.
PMID: 21345104BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Havard Dalen, MD, PhD
Levanger Hospital/Norwegian University of Science an Technology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2011
First Posted
April 7, 2011
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
November 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11