Human Factors Intervention to Reduce Risk in Primary Care of the Elderly
SAFE-C
A Human Factors Intervention to Reduce Risk in Primary Care of the Elderly
2 other identifiers
interventional
2,332
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Human factors engineering literature makes clear that appropriate, well-designed and well-timed information improves decision making and can reduce mental workload. Data from a previous study showed that appropriate, well-designed and well-timed information is not present in many primary care encounters with elderly patients. This puts primary care physicians at risk of higher mental workload and poor decision making which can affect the quality and safety of care delivered to patients. Elderly patients are at particular risk because they are more likely to have more comorbidities, medications, and cognitive impairments. Dr. Karsh and his research team will test an intervention to improve the performance of primary care physicians and, thus the safety of primary care of the elderly. The investigators will use a randomized experiment, with random assignment at the level of patient, to test and evaluate the intervention. The evaluation will involve 4 primary care clinics, with 4 primary care physicians per clinic. The investigators will collect data from 768 patient visits pre-intervention and 1536 patient visits during the intervention. Intervention patients will be randomly assigned to the intervention or care as usual. The Intervention has two components: Pre-visit care coordination:
- 5-7 days prior to a study patient's appointment with his/her doctor, the doctor's nurse/MA will call the study patient and collect pertinent clinical information about the patient using a data collection form the investigators call a Patient Overview Document or POD.
- The nurse/MA will ensure that any lab results, consultant reports, ER reports, imaging studies, etc., that will be needed by the physician are available to the doctor. Team Meeting: On the day of the patient's appointment and prior to the beginning of the clinic session, the nurse/MA will meet briefly with the doctor to jointly review the POD. Hypotheses: H1. Primary Care Physician (PCP): The intervention will increase situation awareness, reduce PCP mental workload, reduce PCP perceived likelihood of error, and improve PCP visit satisfaction. PCP efficiency, as measured by encounter problem density during a visit, will also improve. H2. Patient: The intervention will improve patients' perceptions of their visits on a variety of AHRQ CAHPS measures, such as physician knowledge of patient history. H3. Patient: The intervention will not impact the number or types of problems addressed during the visit. H4. Clinic: The intervention will not affect visit RVUs
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 21, 2017
CompletedFebruary 12, 2019
February 1, 2019
1.7 years
March 23, 2011
February 8, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number and types of problems discussed during visit
There are no outcome measures for individual patients. We will review the dictated clinic note for each study patient visit in order to * Make a list of the all problems (e.g., hypertension, asthma, annual influenza vaccination, etc.) that are discussed in the clinic note; * Record the number of problems that the patient and doctor discussed. We will compare the number of problems and the kind of problems found in the intervention patient group with the number and kind of problems found in the care-as-usual group.
04/12
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Resource utilization
04/12
Study Arms (2)
intervention
EXPERIMENTALReceived the intervention: previsit planning phone call with filled out patient overview document \& clinician huddle
observation
NO INTERVENTIONReceived usual care
Interventions
The Intervention has two components: 1. Pre-visit care coordination: * 5-7 days prior to a study patient's appointment with the doctor, the doctor's nurse/MA will call the study patient and collect pertinent clinical information using a data collection form we call a Patient Overview Document or POD. The purpose of the POD is to comprehensively inform the doctor about the patient before the doctor enters the exam room. * The nurse/MA will ensure that lab results, consultant reports, ER reports, imaging studies, etc., needed by the physician during the patient's visit, are available to the doctor in their usual place. 2. Team Meeting: On the day of the patient's appointment, prior to the beginning of the clinic session, the nurse/MA and doctor will jointly review the POD.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be greater than or equal to 65 years of age
- Must be patients of participating physicians
You may not qualify if:
- Cannot speak English
- Cannot hear well enough to respond to questions via the telephone or do not have a caregiver who can respond to questions on their behalf
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ben-Tzion Karsh, PhD
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2011
First Posted
March 31, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 21, 2017
Last Updated
February 12, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02