Study Stopped
Insufficient study support
Patient Positioning in Lumbar Fusion Surgery and Its Impact on Spinal Sagittal Balance and Surgeon Satisfaction
Operative Patient Positioning in Lumbar Fusion Surgery and Its Impact on Spinal Sagittal Balance and Surgeon Satisfaction
1 other identifier
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a parallel, randomized controlled trial comparing two types of patient positioning and their effect on radiologic measures (pre-surgery visit, in the operating room prior to surgery, at the conclusion of surgery, and at 3 weeks after surgery at patients' postoperative visits) as well as surgeon satisfaction (prior to the end of the surgery) and patient outcomes using patient self reported scales (pre-surgery, post surgery at 3 weeks follow-up).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedJune 23, 2015
May 1, 2015
3.9 years
March 29, 2011
June 22, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To assess if the specific intra-operative positioning affects post-operative sagittal alignment
X-rays will be performed at patients' pre-surgery visit, in the operating room prior to surgery and at the conclusion of surgery, and at 3 weeks after surgery at patients' postoperative visit. The specifics of the pelvic parameters will be measured at these visits. Also, the patient will complete VAS, ODI (Davidson, 2002; Fairbank, 2000 ), and WHOQOL-BREF prior to surgery and at 3 weeks follow-up. We will collect data on any complications occurring in the perioperative period till 3 weeks after surgery
Will be assessed during immediate post-operative period (day 1) as well as 3 weeks post-operatively
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Surgeon satisfaction with operative patient positioning
During surgery (day 1)
Study Arms (2)
Standard Positioning
NO INTERVENTIONHyperlordotic Positioning
ACTIVE COMPARATORHyperlordotic positioning will be achieved through pelvic pads positioned low on iliac crest to maximize lumbar hyperlordosis and increased hip flexion with as many pillows as tolerated at thighs and knees to allow for increased sacral slope. Regular position will involve the pelvic pads at above or iliac crest and without extra pillows at thighs and legs.
Interventions
Hyperlordotic positioning will be achieved through pelvic pads positioned low on iliac crest to maximize lumbar hyperlordosis and increased hip flexion with as many pillows as tolerated at thighs and knees to allow for increased sacral slope. Regular position will involve the pelvic pads at above or iliac crest and without extra pillows at thighs and legs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults patients, aged between 18 and 65 years of age
- Patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \< 18 years of age or \> 65 years of age
- Patients who have a history of metastatic disease
- Patients who currently have a pending workman's compensation claim
- Patients who have had a previous spinal surgery
- Patients who have or have had a spinal infection
- Patients who have a spinal deformity, such as scoliosis
- Women who are pregnant
- Inpatients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Oren N Gottfried, MD
Duke University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2011
First Posted
March 30, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2015
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05