Time to Become Negative of Three Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria
1 other identifier
observational
424
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Background: Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria provide the possibility of a parasite-based diagnosis in areas where good quality microscopy can not be achieved. P. falciparum tests targeting the histidine-rich protein (HRP2) antigen are generally more sensitive than tests targeting the Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) antigen. However, as the HRP2 antigen is eliminated from the bloodstream more slowly than the pLDH antigen, HRP2-based tests can give a positive result two weeks or more after the patient has taken an effective treatment, while pLDH tests generally turn negative a few days after. The use of an RDT positive result in a routine patient care is therefore challenged by the interpretation of whether the result is due to a lasting effect of the already treated infection or to a new infection. The interpretation might also be affected by the level of malaria transmission in the area. Objective: The objective of this study is to estimate the proportion of positive tests in patients successfully treated for malaria (smear negative) at different time points in time after treatment, for three rapid diagnostic tests: SD Bioline Malaria Antigen P.f. (catalogue number: 05FK50-02-4), CareStart Malaria HRP2 (Pf) (catalogue number: G0141) and CareStart Malaria pLDH (PAN) (catalogue number: G0111). The study will be carried out in two settings with known low and high malaria transmission levels in order to provide guidance of interpretation of a RDT positive result depending on the intensity of malaria transmission. Secondary objectives will be to measure the sensitivity and specificity of the malaria rapid tests compared to smear microscopy, to estimate the median time to become negative for each of the tests and to estimate the proportion of positive tests and the median time to become negative according to the initial parasitaemia and the presence of gametocytes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2011
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedNovember 30, 2015
November 1, 2015
1.4 years
March 29, 2011
November 26, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To estimate the proportion of positive tests in patients successfully treated for malaria (smear negative) at different time points after treatment, for three rapid diagnostic tests: two HRP2 test and one pLDH test.
day 2, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 after the start of antimalarial treatment intake
Secondary Outcomes (3)
To measure the sensitivity and specificity of the malaria rapid tests compared to smear microscopy.
The day of patient's enrollment only (day 0)
To estimate the median time to become negative for each of the rapid diagnostic test.
day 2, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 after the start of antimalarial treatment intake
To estimate the proportion of positive tests among smear negative results and the median time to become negative according to the initial parasitaemia and the presence of gametocytes.
day 2, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 after the start of antimalarial treatment intake
Eligibility Criteria
The study population will be patients under 5 years of age who attend the consultation service of one health centre of Mbarara municipality (low transmission setting) and one health centre in Kazo sub-county (high transmission setting).
You may qualify if:
- Age under 5 years
- Clinical malaria defined as fever (axillary temperature ≥ 37.5°C) or history of fever in the previous 48 hours
- Weight ≥ 5 kg
- Informed consent given by the parent or a tutor
- High probability of coming to all follow-up visits
You may not qualify if:
- General signs of danger or of severe malaria according to the WHO criteria
- Treatment course of antimalarials in the previous 2 weeks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Epicentrelead
- Medecins Sans Frontieres, Netherlandscollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Kazo level 4 health centre
Kazo, Greater Mbarara District, Uganda
Mbarara Municipality level 2 health centre
Mbarara, Greater Mbarara District, Uganda
Related Publications (1)
Grandesso F, Nabasumba C, Nyehangane D, Page AL, Bastard M, De Smet M, Boum Y, Etard JF. Performance and time to become negative after treatment of three malaria rapid diagnostic tests in low and high malaria transmission settings. Malar J. 2016 Oct 4;15(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1529-6.
PMID: 27716244DERIVED
Biospecimen
Blood smears for microcopy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Francesco Grandesso, MSc
Epicentre
- STUDY CHAIR
Carolyn Nabasumba, MD
Epicentre
- STUDY CHAIR
Yap Boom, MSc, PhD
Epicentre
- STUDY CHAIR
Anne-Laure Page, PhD
Epicentre
- STUDY CHAIR
Mathieu Bastard, MSc
Epicentre
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jean-François Etard, MD, PhD
Epicentre
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2011
First Posted
March 30, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 30, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-11