NCT01325974

Brief Summary

Background: Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria provide the possibility of a parasite-based diagnosis in areas where good quality microscopy can not be achieved. P. falciparum tests targeting the histidine-rich protein (HRP2) antigen are generally more sensitive than tests targeting the Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) antigen. However, as the HRP2 antigen is eliminated from the bloodstream more slowly than the pLDH antigen, HRP2-based tests can give a positive result two weeks or more after the patient has taken an effective treatment, while pLDH tests generally turn negative a few days after. The use of an RDT positive result in a routine patient care is therefore challenged by the interpretation of whether the result is due to a lasting effect of the already treated infection or to a new infection. The interpretation might also be affected by the level of malaria transmission in the area. Objective: The objective of this study is to estimate the proportion of positive tests in patients successfully treated for malaria (smear negative) at different time points in time after treatment, for three rapid diagnostic tests: SD Bioline Malaria Antigen P.f. (catalogue number: 05FK50-02-4), CareStart Malaria HRP2 (Pf) (catalogue number: G0141) and CareStart Malaria pLDH (PAN) (catalogue number: G0111). The study will be carried out in two settings with known low and high malaria transmission levels in order to provide guidance of interpretation of a RDT positive result depending on the intensity of malaria transmission. Secondary objectives will be to measure the sensitivity and specificity of the malaria rapid tests compared to smear microscopy, to estimate the median time to become negative for each of the tests and to estimate the proportion of positive tests and the median time to become negative according to the initial parasitaemia and the presence of gametocytes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
424

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 29, 2011

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 30, 2011

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2011

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2013

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

November 30, 2015

Status Verified

November 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

March 29, 2011

Last Update Submit

November 26, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

MalariaPlasmodium falciparumDiagnosisRapid diagnostic testmalaria transmission

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To estimate the proportion of positive tests in patients successfully treated for malaria (smear negative) at different time points after treatment, for three rapid diagnostic tests: two HRP2 test and one pLDH test.

    day 2, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 after the start of antimalarial treatment intake

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • To measure the sensitivity and specificity of the malaria rapid tests compared to smear microscopy.

    The day of patient's enrollment only (day 0)

  • To estimate the median time to become negative for each of the rapid diagnostic test.

    day 2, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 after the start of antimalarial treatment intake

  • To estimate the proportion of positive tests among smear negative results and the median time to become negative according to the initial parasitaemia and the presence of gametocytes.

    day 2, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 after the start of antimalarial treatment intake

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 5 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population will be patients under 5 years of age who attend the consultation service of one health centre of Mbarara municipality (low transmission setting) and one health centre in Kazo sub-county (high transmission setting).

You may qualify if:

  • Age under 5 years
  • Clinical malaria defined as fever (axillary temperature ≥ 37.5°C) or history of fever in the previous 48 hours
  • Weight ≥ 5 kg
  • Informed consent given by the parent or a tutor
  • High probability of coming to all follow-up visits

You may not qualify if:

  • General signs of danger or of severe malaria according to the WHO criteria
  • Treatment course of antimalarials in the previous 2 weeks

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Kazo level 4 health centre

Kazo, Greater Mbarara District, Uganda

Location

Mbarara Municipality level 2 health centre

Mbarara, Greater Mbarara District, Uganda

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Grandesso F, Nabasumba C, Nyehangane D, Page AL, Bastard M, De Smet M, Boum Y, Etard JF. Performance and time to become negative after treatment of three malaria rapid diagnostic tests in low and high malaria transmission settings. Malar J. 2016 Oct 4;15(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1529-6.

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

Blood smears for microcopy

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Malaria, FalciparumMalariaDisease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Protozoan InfectionsParasitic DiseasesInfectionsMosquito-Borne DiseasesVector Borne DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Francesco Grandesso, MSc

    Epicentre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Carolyn Nabasumba, MD

    Epicentre

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Yap Boom, MSc, PhD

    Epicentre

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Anne-Laure Page, PhD

    Epicentre

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Mathieu Bastard, MSc

    Epicentre

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Jean-François Etard, MD, PhD

    Epicentre

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2011

First Posted

March 30, 2011

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion

February 1, 2013

Study Completion

May 1, 2013

Last Updated

November 30, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-11

Locations