NCT01325714

Brief Summary

This study tests whether education about memory and pain might help to prevent aggression in persons with dementia who have pain. The overall goal of this intervention is to reduce the risk of aggressive behavior by improving several areas of patient life that are known causes of aggression: pain, depression, lack of pleasurable activities, caregiver stress and difficulty in caregiver-patient communication.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
203

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2011

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 28, 2011

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 30, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2011

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2015

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 19, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

June 24, 2016

Status Verified

May 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

March 28, 2011

Results QC Date

March 25, 2016

Last Update Submit

May 19, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants With Aggression as Determined by the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (Aggression Subscale)

    The CMAI lists 13 behaviors (2 verbal and 11 nonverbal) and for each behavior the participant indicates how frequently the behavior occurs (1-5, higher values = greater frequency) and how disruptive the behavior is (1-5, higher values = greater disruptiveness). For any given behavior, if a participant scored a 2 or higher on BOTH frequency (i.e., it occurred "less than once a week" or more often) and disruptiveness (i.e., it was "a little" disruptive or more), he/she was considered aggressive. Overall aggression takes into account all 13 behaviors, whereas verbal aggression only pertains to two behaviors and non-verbal aggression pertains to 11 behaviors. One is considered verbally aggressive if he/she responds with a 2 or higher on both frequency and disruptiveness for either of the two verbal behaviors. One is considered non-verbally aggressive if he/she responds with a 2 or higher on both frequency and disruptiveness for any of the 11 non-verbal behaviors.

    Three Months, Six Months, Twelve Months Post Intervention

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Caregiver-Reported Worst Pain

    Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months

  • Patient-reported Worst Pain.

    Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

  • Caregiver Reported Overall Pain Over the Last Several Weeks

    Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.

  • Patient-reported Overall Pain Over the Last Several Weeks

    Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

  • Depression

    Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Arm 1: PAVeD Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

In the experimental arm, the caregiver will receive six to eight 45-minute visits to teach caregiver about pain and memory problems. The person with dementia will also be able to learn from these visits. These visits will take place over three months.

Behavioral: PAVeD Intervention

Arm 2: Enhanced Usual Care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the comparison arm, the caregiver will receive information in the mail about memory problems and pain; and the caregiver will receive eight short telephone calls to check on how the person with dementia is doing.

Behavioral: Enhanced Usual Care

Interventions

In the PAVeD Intervention, the caregiver will receive six to eight 45-minute visits to teach caregiver about pain and memory problems. The person with dementia will also be able to learn from these visits. These visits will take place over three months.

Arm 1: PAVeD Intervention

In Enhanced Usual Care, the caregiver will receive information in the mail about memory problems and pain; and the caregiver will receive eight short telephone calls to check on how the person with dementia is doing. Primary Care providers will be notified through electronic medical records about any significant behavioral problems or pain.

Arm 2: Enhanced Usual Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients will be eligible to participate in the study if they meet the following criteria:
  • have a documented diagnosis of dementia
  • receive primary care from the VA
  • reside outside a long-term care facility
  • live within 45 minutes of the MEDVAMC
  • have mild-to-moderate dementia
  • have no history of aggression in the past year
  • have no evidence of aggression on the CMAI at baseline (i.e., do not score 2 or higher on both frequency and disruptiveness for any of 13 behaviors listed).
  • have a caregiver who is directly involved with the patient:
  • at least 8 hours per week
  • sees the patient at least twice a week
  • and speaks English
  • report clinically significant pain (either directly or through the caregiver as a proxy)

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients will be excluded if they have had history of aggression in the past year
  • The investigators will administer the aggression subscale of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI)
  • Aggression will be considered present if any of the following items are endorsed as having occurred over the prior year:
  • spitting
  • cursing/verbal aggression
  • hitting
  • kicking
  • grabbing
  • pushing
  • throwing
  • biting
  • scratching
  • hurting self/others
  • tearing things/destroying property
  • making inappropriate verbal sexual advances
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Fowler JH, Dannecker K, Stanley M, Wilson N, Snow AL, Kunik ME. Preventing aggression and other secondary features of dementia in elderly persons: Three case studies. Bull Menninger Clin. 2015 Spring;79(2):95-115. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2015.79.2.95.

  • Bradford A, Shrestha S, Snow AL, Stanley MA, Wilson N, Hersch G, Kunik ME. Managing pain to prevent aggression in people with dementia: a nonpharmacologic intervention. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2012 Feb;27(1):41-7. doi: 10.1177/1533317512439795.

  • Breland JY, Barrera TL, Snow AL, Sansgiry S, Stanley MA, Wilson N, Amspoker AB, Kunik ME. Correlates of pain intensity in community-dwelling individuals with mild to moderate dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015 May;30(3):320-5. doi: 10.1177/1533317514545827. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

  • Li J, Snow AL, Wilson N, Stanley MA, Morgan RO, Sansgiry S, Kunik ME. The Quality of Pain Treatment in Community-Dwelling Persons with Dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2015 Dec 5;5(3):459-70. doi: 10.1159/000441717. eCollection 2015 Sep-Dec.

  • Amspoker AB, Snow AL, Renn BN, Block P, Pickens S, Morgan RO, Kunik ME. Patient Versus Informal Caregiver Proxy Reports of Pain Interference in Persons With Dementia. J Appl Gerontol. 2021 Apr;40(4):414-422. doi: 10.1177/0733464820902632. Epub 2020 Feb 6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DementiaAggressionPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersAberrant Motor Behavior in DementiaBehavioral SymptomsBehaviorSocial BehaviorNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Mark Kunik, MD, MPH
Organization
Houston Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety

Study Officials

  • Mark E. Kunik, MD MPH

    Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2011

First Posted

March 30, 2011

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion

February 1, 2015

Study Completion

September 1, 2015

Last Updated

June 24, 2016

Results First Posted

May 19, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations