Safety and Tolerability of the Derma Vax(Trademark) Clinical Intradermal Electroporation System in Healthy Subjects
2 other identifiers
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: \- Researchers are investigating the use of DNA vaccines to treat various types of cancer by provoking an immune system response to tumor cells. DNA vaccines mimic the effect of normal vaccines given to prevent infectious diseases, but they have been less effective than anticipated in humans. To improve the effectiveness of DNA vaccines, researchers are studying alternate delivery methods, such as the investigational Derma Vax(Trademark) injection system that delivers the vaccine into the skin. However, because the Derma Vax(Trademark) system has not been studied in humans, more research is needed to determine whether this new vaccine delivery method is safe and tolerable, particularly in terms of pain levels and skin reactions. Objectives: \- To evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and relative pain levels of intradermal electroporation using Derma Vax(Trademark) administered after pretreatment with either a topical cream anesthetic or placebo cream. Eligibility: \- Healthy individuals between 18 and 55 years of age. Design:
- Participants will be screened with a medical history, physical examination, blood and urine tests, and an electrocardiogram.
- Participants will have two different creams applied to their upper arms: one cream will be an anesthetic (lidocaine and prilocaine) and the other will be a placebo lotion. Each arm will receive a different cream.
- Once the cream has taken effect, participants will receive Derma Vax(Trademark) treatment. No actual medication will be given during the injection; participants will evaluate their reaction based on the pressure and needle stick alone.
- Immediately after the treatment, participants will use the Visual Analogue Scale of pain intensity to provide a description of the level of pain experienced during the injection.
- Participants will complete additional questionnaires about pain intensity and will have the injected skin site inspected to determine possible reactions to the injection. They will also be asked their opinions on whether (based on pain levels) a series of Derma Vax(Trademark) treatments would be acceptable for treatment of a serious illness.
- The day after the injection, participants will return for an additional skin assessment of the treated areas.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Jun 2009
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 25, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 27, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 27, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 26, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2011
CompletedJuly 2, 2017
September 20, 2011
11 months
March 26, 2011
June 30, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Safety & Tolerability of Derma Vax
VAS with/without EMLA
Secondary Outcomes (2)
McGill Questionnaire and Present Pain Intensity with/without EMLA
Time course Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and skin irritation and skin resistance
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female and male subjects, age 18 to 55 and in good health as determined by past medical history, physical examination, vital signs, electrocardiogram, and laboratory tests.
- Body mass index (BMI) must be within the range of 18 to 30 kg/m(2), inclusive
- Vital signs should be within the following ranges at screening and baseline:
- Oral body temperature between 35.0-37.5 degree C
- Systolic blood pressure, 85-140 mm Hg
- Diastolic blood pressure, 50-90 mm Hg
- Pulse rate, 50 - 100 bpm
- Ability to provide an informed consent.
- Blood tests demonstrating normal physiologic organ functions:
- Hematological (neutrophils greater than or equal to 1000; hemoglobin greater than or equal to 12 g/dl (female) and greater than or equal to 14g/dl (male); platelets \> 150,000).
- Creatinine (Cre \< 1.5 times ULN)
- LFTs (SGOT, SGPT, \< 2.5 times ULN)
- PT and/or PTT \< 1.5 times ULN
You may not qualify if:
- Participation in any clinical investigation within 4 weeks prior to dosing or longer if required by local regulations, and for any other limitation of participation based on local regulations.
- Significant illness within two weeks prior to dosing.
- History of clinically significant drug allergy or history of atopic allergy (asthma, urticaria, eczematous dermatitis)
- History of chronic skin disease that might interfere with IDEP application
- Known allergic reactions to adhesive tape
- History of use of chronic or current pain medication (narcotics)
- Sunburn or tattoos at the application sites (both shoulders)
- Subject has a pacemaker or implanted defibrillator
- A past medical history of clinically significant EKG abnormalities or a family history (grandparents, parents and siblings) of a sudden cardiac death or dysrhythmia.
- History of drug or alcohol abuse within the 12 months prior to dosing.
- History of noncompliance to medical regimens or unwillingness to comply with the study protocol
- History of HIV or hepatitis B or C.
- Pregnancy
- Known allergy to local anesthetics such as lidocaine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Institute of Aging, Harbor Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224, United States
Related Publications (3)
Lowe DB, Shearer MH, Kennedy RC. DNA vaccines: successes and limitations in cancer and infectious disease. J Cell Biochem. 2006 May 15;98(2):235-42. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20775.
PMID: 16440328BACKGROUNDTang DC, DeVit M, Johnston SA. Genetic immunization is a simple method for eliciting an immune response. Nature. 1992 Mar 12;356(6365):152-4. doi: 10.1038/356152a0.
PMID: 1545867BACKGROUNDSrivastava IK, Liu MA. Gene vaccines. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Apr 1;138(7):550-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-7-200304010-00011.
PMID: 12667025BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2011
First Posted
March 29, 2011
Study Start
June 25, 2009
Primary Completion
May 27, 2010
Study Completion
May 27, 2010
Last Updated
July 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2011-09-20