Safety and Efficacy of ORM-12741 in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease
ALPO
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ORM-12741 is safe and effective in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Apr 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 28, 2021
CompletedApril 28, 2021
April 1, 2021
1.4 years
March 24, 2011
March 27, 2018
April 1, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Adverse events from start of ORM-12741 treatment until end of study visit.
3 months
Quality of Episodic Memory
The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning. Quality of Episodic Memory measures the capability of maintaining information in episodic memory and is assessed as the sum of sensitivity indices from 4 memory tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests. Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.
3 months
Quality of Working Memory
The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning. Quality of Working Memory measures the capability of maintaining information in working memory and is assessed as the sum of sensitivity indices from 2 memory tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests. Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.
3 months
Quality of Memory
The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning. Quality of Memory is a combination of outcome measures Quality of Working Memory \& Quality of Episodic Memory. Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.
3 months
Speed of Memory
The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning. Speed of Memory is assessed as the sum of speed measures from 2 memory tasks and 2 recognition tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests. Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.
3 months
Power of Attention
The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning. Power of attention measures speed and attention and is assessed from 3 attentional tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests. Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.
3 months
Continuity of Attention
The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning. Continuity of attention measures speed and accuracy and is calculated from 3 attentional tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests. Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
NPI Total Score
3 months
Caregiver Distress Score
3 months
Pharmacokinetics of ORM-12741
3 months
Study Arms (3)
Low dose of ORM-12741
EXPERIMENTALHigh dose of ORM-12741
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Informed consent obtained from the patient and legally acceptable representative, if required
- Informed consent obtained from the caregiver
- Males and and females between 55-90 years
- Diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease, history of progressive cognitive deterioration
- Brain imaging consistent with Alzheimer's disease
- Mini-mental state examination score 12-21
- Treated with donepezil, rivastigmine or galantamine
- At least mild level of behavioral symptoms
You may not qualify if:
- Other types of dementias
- Modified Hachinski Ischemia Score \> 4
- Use of memantine, antipsychotics, anticholinergic medication and benzodiazepines (at a max of 3 nights/week) within 2 months
- Changes in antidepressant dosing within 2 months
- Use of other psychotropic agents
- Myocardial infarction within the past 2 years
- Malignancy within the past 5 years
- Suicidal ideation, risk of suicide
- History of alcoholism or drug abuse within 5 years
- Clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological or psychiatric disorder or any other major concurrent illness
- Specific findings in brain imaging
- Abnormal findings in heart rate, blood pressure, ECG, laboratory tests, physical examination; orthostatic hypotension
- Blood donation or participation in a drug study within 60 days
- Previous AD immunotherapy treatment
- Patient cannot complete the computerised cognitive training
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinical Research Services Turku (CRST)
Turku, 20520, Finland
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Clinical Study Director
- Organization
- Orion Global Clinical Operations
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Juha Rinne, Prof
Clinical Research services Turku (CRST)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2011
First Posted
March 29, 2011
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2012
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 28, 2021
Results First Posted
April 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04