NCT01324518

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether ORM-12741 is safe and effective in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2011

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 24, 2011

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 29, 2011

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2011

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2012

Completed
8.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 28, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 28, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

March 24, 2011

Results QC Date

March 27, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 1, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Adverse events from start of ORM-12741 treatment until end of study visit.

    3 months

  • Quality of Episodic Memory

    The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning. Quality of Episodic Memory measures the capability of maintaining information in episodic memory and is assessed as the sum of sensitivity indices from 4 memory tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests. Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.

    3 months

  • Quality of Working Memory

    The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning. Quality of Working Memory measures the capability of maintaining information in working memory and is assessed as the sum of sensitivity indices from 2 memory tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests. Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.

    3 months

  • Quality of Memory

    The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning. Quality of Memory is a combination of outcome measures Quality of Working Memory \& Quality of Episodic Memory. Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.

    3 months

  • Speed of Memory

    The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning. Speed of Memory is assessed as the sum of speed measures from 2 memory tasks and 2 recognition tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests. Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.

    3 months

  • Power of Attention

    The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning. Power of attention measures speed and attention and is assessed from 3 attentional tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests. Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.

    3 months

  • Continuity of Attention

    The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning. Continuity of attention measures speed and accuracy and is calculated from 3 attentional tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests. Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • NPI Total Score

    3 months

  • Caregiver Distress Score

    3 months

  • Pharmacokinetics of ORM-12741

    3 months

Study Arms (3)

Low dose of ORM-12741

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: ORM-12741

High dose of ORM-12741

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: ORM-12741

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR
Drug: Placebo for ORM-12741

Interventions

60mg twice a day

Low dose of ORM-12741

Placebo twice a day

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Informed consent obtained from the patient and legally acceptable representative, if required
  • Informed consent obtained from the caregiver
  • Males and and females between 55-90 years
  • Diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease, history of progressive cognitive deterioration
  • Brain imaging consistent with Alzheimer's disease
  • Mini-mental state examination score 12-21
  • Treated with donepezil, rivastigmine or galantamine
  • At least mild level of behavioral symptoms

You may not qualify if:

  • Other types of dementias
  • Modified Hachinski Ischemia Score \> 4
  • Use of memantine, antipsychotics, anticholinergic medication and benzodiazepines (at a max of 3 nights/week) within 2 months
  • Changes in antidepressant dosing within 2 months
  • Use of other psychotropic agents
  • Myocardial infarction within the past 2 years
  • Malignancy within the past 5 years
  • Suicidal ideation, risk of suicide
  • History of alcoholism or drug abuse within 5 years
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological or psychiatric disorder or any other major concurrent illness
  • Specific findings in brain imaging
  • Abnormal findings in heart rate, blood pressure, ECG, laboratory tests, physical examination; orthostatic hypotension
  • Blood donation or participation in a drug study within 60 days
  • Previous AD immunotherapy treatment
  • Patient cannot complete the computerised cognitive training
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinical Research Services Turku (CRST)

Turku, 20520, Finland

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease

Interventions

ORM-12741

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DementiaBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTauopathiesNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Study Director
Organization
Orion Global Clinical Operations

Study Officials

  • Juha Rinne, Prof

    Clinical Research services Turku (CRST)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2011

First Posted

March 29, 2011

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion

September 1, 2012

Study Completion

October 1, 2012

Last Updated

April 28, 2021

Results First Posted

April 28, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04

Locations