NCT01321762

Brief Summary

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is one of the most common indications for gynaecological surgery. In 1997, more than 225000 inpatient surgical procedures for POP were undertaken in USA (22.7 per 10000 women) at an estimated cost of more than one billion dollars. In the UK, the disorder accounts for 20% of the women on the waiting list for major gynaecological surgery. Vaginal birth, advancing age and increasing body mass are the most consistent risk factors. Furthermore a racial and congenital predisposition has been reported. The cause of this disorder is likely to be multifactorial and attributable to a combination of factors, varying from patient to patient. Controversy exists as to whether the pregnancy per se rather than the mode of delivery alters the risk of POP. Caesarean section appears to protect against the development of prolapse. However, when a caesarean section is undertaken during the active stage of labour it may not be completely protective. Ideally prospective longitudinal studies are needed to study the impact of pregnancy and childbirth on pelvic organ prolapse. Unfortunately, studies to date, are small with poor follow-up and have only assessed objective outcome rendering it difficult to draw conclusions. The primary objective of our study was to objectively assess the impact of pregnancy and childbirth on pelvic organ support using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ)System.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
403

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2005

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2005

Completed
5.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2010

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 11, 2011

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 24, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

April 19, 2012

Status Verified

April 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

5.7 years

First QC Date

March 11, 2011

Last Update Submit

April 18, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

ProlapseChildbirthPregnancy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Objective assessment of Prolapse using Pelvic organ prolapse Quantification System

    Prospective evaluation of the impact of mode of delivery on pelvic organ support using the International Continence Society recommended Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POPQ).

    2nd trimester, 3rd trimester, 14 weeks, 12 months and 5 years after childbirth

Study Arms (1)

1

Pregnant Women with singleton pregnancy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Pregnant women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy attending the ultrasound scan clinic in the second trimester were invited to participate

You may qualify if:

  • Singleton Pregnancy

You may not qualify if:

  • Multiple pregnancies
  • Previous prolapse surgery
  • Medical disorders including diabetes mellitus
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Collagen disorders

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Croydon University Hospital

Croydon, Surrey, CR7 7YE, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ ProlapseProlapse

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Consultant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2011

First Posted

March 24, 2011

Study Start

April 1, 2005

Primary Completion

December 1, 2010

Study Completion

December 1, 2010

Last Updated

April 19, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-04

Locations