NCT01321125

Brief Summary

The physicians have few options for skin antisepsis. Alternatives for common use antiseptics are costly or ineffective. In order to have more options, this study is needed. The investigators want to know if there are differences between the use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol or 10% sodium hypochlorite.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2011

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 22, 2011

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 23, 2011

Completed
9 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2011

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

June 24, 2013

Status Verified

September 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

March 22, 2011

Last Update Submit

June 20, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

AntisepticsAdministration cutaneouslyChlorine compoundsAnti-infecting agents, local

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Comparison of the efficacy of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol and 10% sodium hypochlorite

    Compare decrease in colony forming units in cultures of samples taken with both antiseptics

    24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Presence of skin reactions for the 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol

    24 hours

  • Presence of allergy or any reaction at 24 hours after the antiseptic application.

    24 hours

  • Bacterial count of skin cultures for the 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol

    24 hours

  • Bacterial count of skin cultures for the 10% sodium hypochlorite

    24 hours

  • Bacterial count of skin cultures for the control 1

    24 hours

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Whole group of 30 volunteers

EXPERIMENTAL

The arm is composed of 30 human volunteers to test 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (ChloraPrep ®, Enturia, Texas, USA ), hypochlorite 10% of electrochemical production (Except 10% ®, Pisa, Guadalajara, Mexico), and two controls.

Biological: Bacterial culture of the prepared skin's areasOther: Preparing skin's areas to be tested

test group of substantivity

EXPERIMENTAL

The arm is composed of 10 human volunteers to test 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (ChloraPrep ®, Enturia, Texas, USA ), hypochlorite 10% of electrochemical production (Except 10% ®, Pisa, Guadalajara, Mexico), and 10% povidone-iodine (Isodine Solucion ®, Boehringer-Ingelheim Promeco, Mexico City)

Biological: Antiseptic substantivity

Interventions

Cultures were taken with a scrub-cup of 5cm2 of internal area pressed over the skin previously prepared, then it was added a 3mL of culture broth (C/E neutralizing broth (D/E Neutralizing Broth, DIFCO TM) containing a neutralizing agent and a detergent agent (1% solution tween-80) as washing solution. The skin was scrub with a sterile rubber policeman for 2 minutes, and the procedure was conducted once again. Both aliquots were gathered together in a sterile tube, and a sample of 50mL was spread in a plate containing a neutralizing agar (D/E neutralizing Agar, DIFCO TM) and incubated at 35°C for 72 hrs. After incubation, the colonies were counted.

Also known as: Neutralizing agar, Neutralizing broth
Whole group of 30 volunteers

Two antiseptics (2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol and 10% sodium hypochlorite) and two controls were tested as skin antiseptics. The intervention consisted of preparing four skin's areas with the antiseptic or the control, two in each arm of the volunteer. These ones were approximately 25cm2 on the forearm for each antiseptic or control. The antiseptic or control were applied in an outward circular motion using a swab that was soaked with the solution. The solution was kept on the skin for 60 seconds before the bacterial culture was conducted. Every volunteer were studied in three separate occasions, alternating the four areas in every subsequent test, so every area was studied with each control or antiseptic.

Also known as: Chloraprep (R), Except (R)
Whole group of 30 volunteers

Three antiseptics will be tested: 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol, 10% sodium hypochlorite and 10% povidone-iodine, each one will be applied on the surface of one fingertip each, and will be allow to dry for 60 seconds, then the remaining antiseptic on the skin will be wash out with distilled water. The evaluated zones will be dried with sterile gauze, and then will be covered with sterile gauze for two hours. After this period, each finger will be placed for 30 seconds on an agar plate, which will be inoculated whit an ATCC E. coli. The plate will be incubated at 35ºC for 72 hrs. After incubation, a blinded technician will report the presence or absence of bacterial growth

Also known as: 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (ChloraPrep ®, Enturia, Texas, USA ), hypochlorite 10% of electrochemical production (Except 10% ®, Pisa, Guadalajara, Mexico), 10% povidone-iodine (Isodine Solucion ®, Boehringer-Ingelheim Promeco, Mexico City), Muller Hinton agar plate (BD/BBL ™, México City, México).
test group of substantivity

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy adult volunteers

You may not qualify if:

  • History of skin allergies or atopy, as well as reactions to soaps, chlorine or latex

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Guanajuato School of Medicine

León, Guanajuato, 37000, Mexico

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Communicable Diseases

Interventions

chlorhexidine gluconate2-PropanolHypochlorous AcidPovidone-Iodine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PropanolsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsAcids, NoncarboxylicAcidsInorganic ChemicalsChlorine CompoundsReactive Oxygen SpeciesFree RadicalsOxidesOxygen CompoundsIodophorsIodine CompoundsPolyvinylsVinyl CompoundsAlkenesHydrocarbons, AcyclicHydrocarbonsPovidonePyrrolidinonesPyrrolidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPlasticsPolymersMacromolecular SubstancesBiomedical and Dental MaterialsManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Officials

  • Alejandro E Macias, M. D.

    Universidad de Guanajuato

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2011

First Posted

March 23, 2011

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion

December 1, 2011

Study Completion

January 1, 2012

Last Updated

June 24, 2013

Record last verified: 2011-09

Locations