NCT01320657

Brief Summary

This is a clinical study involving patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances ('train-track braces'). A new type of train-track has recently been marketed. Over 4 million patients worldwide are wearing on of these appliances; this system is considerably more expensive than a normal train-track. However, there is little evidence to support its use. The effects of three different types of train-track will be assessed with respect to the quality of Orthodontic tooth movement produced. Furthermore, the impact of the different train-tracks on daily life of orthodontic patients will also be measured. Consequently, the investigators will be able to inform orthodontists' decisions relating to the choice of train-track they recommend for their patients. In addition, should the more expensive appliances demonstrate objective or subjective advantage, a significant efficiency saving may develop.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
96

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2009

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2009

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 21, 2011

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 22, 2011

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2012

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

December 22, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

March 21, 2011

Last Update Submit

December 20, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Self-ligatingorthodonticapplianceexpansiondental inclinationExpansion and inclination changes

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Transverse dimensional changes and bucco-lingual inclination changes

    Width in mm

    3 years 10 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Subjective pain experience

    3 years 10 months

Study Arms (3)

InOvation C

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Active Self-ligating Bracket

Device: Conventional orthodontic bracket, passive self-ligating brackets and active self-ligating bracket

Ovation

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Conventional Bracket

Device: Conventional orthodontic bracket, passive self-ligating brackets and active self-ligating bracket

Damon Q

EXPERIMENTAL

Self-ligating bracket

Device: Conventional orthodontic bracket, passive self-ligating brackets and active self-ligating bracket

Interventions

Subjects randomized to treatment with one of three fixed orthodontic appliances: Damon Q, InOvation C and Ovation brackets. A pre-determined archwire sequence will be used involving round nickel titanium, rectangular nickel titanium progressing to 0.019 X 0.025 inch stainless steel; specific archwire sequences and appointment intervals will be based on the manufacturer's guidelines. All erupted teeth will have attachments placed from the outset. Treated for a minimum of 8 months with the 0.019 X 0.025 inch stainless steel archwire in place for at least 8 weeks.

Damon QInOvation COvation

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Young adults aged 16 years and over;
  • Fit and well and on no medication;
  • In the permanent dentition;
  • Undergoing orthodontic treatment in preparation for combined orthodontic-surgical care
  • Subjects considered suitable for non-extraction maxillary arch treatment if not undergoing combined orthodontic-surgical treatment;
  • Crowding less than 6mm

You may not qualify if:

  • Cleft lip and palate and other craniofacial anomalies.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

East Kent Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Canterbury, Kent, CT1 3NG, United Kingdom

Location

Royal London Dental Institute

London, E1 1BB, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Fleming PS, Lee RT, Marinho V, Johal A. Comparison of maxillary arch dimensional changes with passive and active self-ligation and conventional brackets in the permanent dentition: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):185-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.012.

Study Officials

  • Robert t Lee, MDS

    Royal London Dental Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Ama Johal, PhD

    QMUL

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Valeria Marinho, PhD

    QMUL

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2011

First Posted

March 22, 2011

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Primary Completion

August 1, 2012

Study Completion

May 1, 2013

Last Updated

December 22, 2022

Record last verified: 2012-04

Locations