The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine on Pain After Lumbar Spinal Fusion
Intravenous Lidocaine for Effective Pain Relief After Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion: a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective randomized study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine injection on the relief of pain in patients undergoing 1-level posterior lumbar fusion. A total of 54 patients will be randomized into one of two groups (group C or group I) based on Excel number generation. Patients in group C will receive received normal saline intravenous injection, and patients in group I will receive an intravenous bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine followed by a continuous lidocaine infusion of 2 mg/kg/hr. Visual analogue scale pain scores, fentanyl consumption and the frequency at which patients pushed the button (FPB) of a patient-controlled analgesia system will be recorded at 4, 12, 24, 48 hours postoperatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 postoperative-pain
Started Mar 2011
Typical duration for phase_4 postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 22, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2013
CompletedAugust 2, 2013
March 1, 2011
1.9 years
March 21, 2011
August 1, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postopeartive pain measured using Visual analogue scale at postoperative 4hour
Patients will be assessed for pain using a visual analogue pain scale (VAS). It is usually a horizontal line, 100 mm in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end; left side end which represents 0 is 'No pain', right side end with 100 is 'Very severe pain'. The patient marks on the line the point that they feel represents their perception of their current state. The VAS score is determined by measuring in millimeters from the left hand end of the line to the point that the patient marks. To check the severity of pain VAS will be measured at post op 4hour.
post op 4hour
Secondary Outcomes (11)
visual analogue scale 12 hour
Post op 12 hour
visual analogue scale 24hour
Post op 24 hour
Visual analogue scale 48hour
Post Op 48hour
Opioid consumption 4hour
Post Op 4hour
Opioid consumption 24hour
Post op 24 hour
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intravenous lidocaine injection group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in Group I (intravenous lidocaine injection group) received an intravenous bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine followed by a continuous lidocaine infusion of 2 mg/kg/hr.
Placebo control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients in Group C (placebo control group) received normal saline intravenous injection
Interventions
Patients in Group I (intravenous lidocaine injection group) received an intravenous bolus injection of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine followed by a continuous lidocaine infusion of 2 mg/kg/hr.
The patients in Group C (placebo control group) received normal saline intravenous injection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- level posterior lumbar fusion
You may not qualify if:
- mental change
- allergy to local anesthetics
- chronic analgesics user
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
ChungAng University
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Kim KT, Cho DC, Sung JK, Kim YB, Kang H, Song KS, Choi GJ. Intraoperative systemic infusion of lidocaine reduces postoperative pain after lumbar surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1559-66. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.031. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
PMID: 24216403DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hyun Kang, Ph.D.,
Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Young-Baeg Kim, Ph.D.
Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2011
First Posted
March 22, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
February 1, 2013
Last Updated
August 2, 2013
Record last verified: 2011-03