NCT01316445

Brief Summary

Approximately 3 million individuals suffer from epilepsy in America alone and about 200,000 new cases of epilepsy in America are diagnosed each year (Epilepsy Foundation, 2005). Epilepsy can be defined as a condition in which a person has recurrent, unprovoked seizures. Prolonged or back-to-back repetitive seizures, known as "acute repetitive seizures" (ARS), are medical emergencies. ARS can occur unexpectedly, a circumstance for which quick and efficient antiepileptic drugs are needed for household and prehospital use. Currently, benzodiazepines are the antiepileptic drug of choice when dealing with ARS because they are proven to be efficient and take little time to work. Benzodiazepines can be administered by mouth, by vein via a needle (intravenously; IV), rectally, between the cheek and gum (buccally), or in the nose (intranasally; IN). The nasal formulation is not yet FDA-approved. The rectal treatment route has been commonly used for acute seizure treatment in past years, but recent studies propose that the nasal route for benzodiazepines may be better overall for home treatment and easier to administer (see Wermeling, 2009). For many "out of hospital" situations, nasal benzodiazepines can be more convenient and more comfortable than rectal treatment. In addition to the above benefits, nasal benzodiazepines are rapidly absorbed by the blood vessels in the nose and the time of drug administration and cessation of seizures may thus be reduced using nasal routes. This study sets out to characterize how fast buccal and nasal treatments begin to work on the brain by monitoring brain waves during administration of the drug, and to determine whether nasal or buccal administration is best.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
9

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2011

Typical duration for phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 15, 2011

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 16, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2011

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

February 4, 2015

Status Verified

February 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

March 15, 2011

Last Update Submit

February 2, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

ElectroencephalographyBenzodiazepinesMidazolam

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • 25% increase in total beta power for at least 1 minute at 10-30Hz

    Quantitative and qualitative visual EEG analysis for benzodiazepine-induced beta activity, total power of \~10-30 Hz activity

    for 30 mins after administration of drug

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • beta activity at 10-12 Hz

    for 30 minutes after drug administration

  • beta activity at 30-40Hz

    for 30 minutes after drug administration

  • sedation

    for 30 minues after drug administration

  • pain/discomfort

    for 30 minutes after drug administration

Study Arms (1)

nasal Midazolam

EXPERIMENTAL

3 mg of the standard IV solution of midazolam (5 mg/mL) was given via a metered-dose nasal sprayer (6 sprays × 0.1 ml/spray, or 6 × 0.5 mg/spray) divided between the two nostrils within 1-2 min. During the EEG, vital signs (blood oxygen saturation, blood pressure, pulse and respiratory rate) were monitored and a nurse and a physician were available at all times. Subjects were monitored for 2 hours after administration of midazolam to ensure adequate recovery from sedation.

Drug: nasal Midazolam

Interventions

Intranasal and buccal administration of the standard IV formulation of midazolam (5mg/mL), administered via a metered dose sprayer at 0.1mL/spray (i.e. 0.5mg/spray). Administration will be via three sprays in each nostril (for nasal) or three sprays between the cheek and the gum per side (for buccal).

Also known as: Versed
nasal Midazolam

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • adults undergoing extracranial EEG in an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit
  • adults undergoing intracranial EEG in an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit
  • adults with chronically implanted intracranial neurostimulators with the capacity for continuous intracranial EEG monitoring

You may not qualify if:

  • any patient on additional sedative medications (narcotics, other central nervous system depressants)
  • any patient with documented sensitivity or adverse reaction to any benzodiazepine

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Columbia University Medical Center, Milstein Hospital

New York, New York, 10032, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Loftsson T, Gudmundsdottir H, Sigurjonsdottir JF, Sigurdsson HH, Sigfusson SD, Masson M, Stefansson E. Cyclodextrin solubilization of benzodiazepines: formulation of midazolam nasal spray. Int J Pharm. 2001 Jan 5;212(1):29-40. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(00)00580-9.

    PMID: 11165818BACKGROUND
  • Knoester PD, Jonker DM, Van Der Hoeven RT, Vermeij TA, Edelbroek PM, Brekelmans GJ, de Haan GJ. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam administered as a concentrated intranasal spray. A study in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 May;53(5):501-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01588.x.

    PMID: 11994056BACKGROUND
  • Wermeling DP, Record KA, Kelly TH, Archer SM, Clinch T, Rudy AC. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new intranasal midazolam formulation in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2006 Aug;103(2):344-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000226150.90317.16.

    PMID: 16861415BACKGROUND
  • Wermeling DP, Record KA, Archer SM, Rudy AC. A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study, in healthy volunteers, of a rapidly absorbed intranasal midazolam formulation. Epilepsy Res. 2009 Feb;83(2-3):124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Nov 29.

    PMID: 19046855BACKGROUND
  • Dale O, Nilsen T, Loftsson T, Hjorth Tonnesen H, Klepstad P, Kaasa S, Holand T, Djupesland PG. Intranasal midazolam: a comparison of two delivery devices in human volunteers. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2006 Oct;58(10):1311-8. doi: 10.1211/jpp.58.10.0003.

    PMID: 17034653BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy

Interventions

Midazolam

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BenzodiazepinesBenzazepinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Derek Chong, MD

    Columbia University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Research Scientist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2011

First Posted

March 16, 2011

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion

February 1, 2014

Study Completion

February 1, 2014

Last Updated

February 4, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-02

Locations