Study Stopped
Funding agency no longer provide support.
Pharmacodynamics of Nasal and Buccal Midazolam Using EEG
nMDZ-EEG
Comparing the Pharmacodynamics of Nasal and Buccal Midazolam Using EEG
1 other identifier
interventional
9
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Approximately 3 million individuals suffer from epilepsy in America alone and about 200,000 new cases of epilepsy in America are diagnosed each year (Epilepsy Foundation, 2005). Epilepsy can be defined as a condition in which a person has recurrent, unprovoked seizures. Prolonged or back-to-back repetitive seizures, known as "acute repetitive seizures" (ARS), are medical emergencies. ARS can occur unexpectedly, a circumstance for which quick and efficient antiepileptic drugs are needed for household and prehospital use. Currently, benzodiazepines are the antiepileptic drug of choice when dealing with ARS because they are proven to be efficient and take little time to work. Benzodiazepines can be administered by mouth, by vein via a needle (intravenously; IV), rectally, between the cheek and gum (buccally), or in the nose (intranasally; IN). The nasal formulation is not yet FDA-approved. The rectal treatment route has been commonly used for acute seizure treatment in past years, but recent studies propose that the nasal route for benzodiazepines may be better overall for home treatment and easier to administer (see Wermeling, 2009). For many "out of hospital" situations, nasal benzodiazepines can be more convenient and more comfortable than rectal treatment. In addition to the above benefits, nasal benzodiazepines are rapidly absorbed by the blood vessels in the nose and the time of drug administration and cessation of seizures may thus be reduced using nasal routes. This study sets out to characterize how fast buccal and nasal treatments begin to work on the brain by monitoring brain waves during administration of the drug, and to determine whether nasal or buccal administration is best.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Jul 2011
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 15, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2014
CompletedFebruary 4, 2015
February 1, 2015
2.6 years
March 15, 2011
February 2, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
25% increase in total beta power for at least 1 minute at 10-30Hz
Quantitative and qualitative visual EEG analysis for benzodiazepine-induced beta activity, total power of \~10-30 Hz activity
for 30 mins after administration of drug
Secondary Outcomes (4)
beta activity at 10-12 Hz
for 30 minutes after drug administration
beta activity at 30-40Hz
for 30 minutes after drug administration
sedation
for 30 minues after drug administration
pain/discomfort
for 30 minutes after drug administration
Study Arms (1)
nasal Midazolam
EXPERIMENTAL3 mg of the standard IV solution of midazolam (5 mg/mL) was given via a metered-dose nasal sprayer (6 sprays × 0.1 ml/spray, or 6 × 0.5 mg/spray) divided between the two nostrils within 1-2 min. During the EEG, vital signs (blood oxygen saturation, blood pressure, pulse and respiratory rate) were monitored and a nurse and a physician were available at all times. Subjects were monitored for 2 hours after administration of midazolam to ensure adequate recovery from sedation.
Interventions
Intranasal and buccal administration of the standard IV formulation of midazolam (5mg/mL), administered via a metered dose sprayer at 0.1mL/spray (i.e. 0.5mg/spray). Administration will be via three sprays in each nostril (for nasal) or three sprays between the cheek and the gum per side (for buccal).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adults undergoing extracranial EEG in an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit
- adults undergoing intracranial EEG in an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit
- adults with chronically implanted intracranial neurostimulators with the capacity for continuous intracranial EEG monitoring
You may not qualify if:
- any patient on additional sedative medications (narcotics, other central nervous system depressants)
- any patient with documented sensitivity or adverse reaction to any benzodiazepine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Columbia Universitylead
- Upsher-Smith Laboratoriescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Columbia University Medical Center, Milstein Hospital
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Related Publications (5)
Loftsson T, Gudmundsdottir H, Sigurjonsdottir JF, Sigurdsson HH, Sigfusson SD, Masson M, Stefansson E. Cyclodextrin solubilization of benzodiazepines: formulation of midazolam nasal spray. Int J Pharm. 2001 Jan 5;212(1):29-40. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(00)00580-9.
PMID: 11165818BACKGROUNDKnoester PD, Jonker DM, Van Der Hoeven RT, Vermeij TA, Edelbroek PM, Brekelmans GJ, de Haan GJ. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam administered as a concentrated intranasal spray. A study in healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 May;53(5):501-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2002.01588.x.
PMID: 11994056BACKGROUNDWermeling DP, Record KA, Kelly TH, Archer SM, Clinch T, Rudy AC. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new intranasal midazolam formulation in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2006 Aug;103(2):344-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000226150.90317.16.
PMID: 16861415BACKGROUNDWermeling DP, Record KA, Archer SM, Rudy AC. A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study, in healthy volunteers, of a rapidly absorbed intranasal midazolam formulation. Epilepsy Res. 2009 Feb;83(2-3):124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Nov 29.
PMID: 19046855BACKGROUNDDale O, Nilsen T, Loftsson T, Hjorth Tonnesen H, Klepstad P, Kaasa S, Holand T, Djupesland PG. Intranasal midazolam: a comparison of two delivery devices in human volunteers. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2006 Oct;58(10):1311-8. doi: 10.1211/jpp.58.10.0003.
PMID: 17034653BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Derek Chong, MD
Columbia University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Research Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2011
First Posted
March 16, 2011
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2014
Study Completion
February 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 4, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02