Contrast Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound (CEH-EUS) in Focal Pancreatic Masses
2 other identifiers
observational
210
8 countries
14
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to assess the accuracy of real-time perfusion imaging pattern of pancreatic focal lesions visualized by contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) for the differential diagnosis between chronic pseudotumoral pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in a prospective multicenter design. The study will include patients with focal pancreatic masses evaluated by CEH-EUS and EUS-FNA. The diagnosis is usually unknown in the moment of the initial evaluation, the patients being included based on a suspicion of focal pancreatic masses after transabdominal ultrasound, CT or MR examinations. However, after a complete evaluation, a final diagnosis will be reached based on the combination of EUS-FNA cytology/pathology, surgical pathology and minimum 12 months follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2011
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 13, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2012
CompletedJanuary 17, 2018
January 1, 2018
1.1 years
March 13, 2011
January 15, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Contrast enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound
Value of contrast enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for the differential diagnoses of pancreatic masses.
Every six months
Study Arms (2)
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Patients diagnosed with solid pancreatic adenocarcinoma masses, with cytological / histologicalconfirmation
Chronic pancreatitis
Patients diagnosed with solid pancreatic tumor masses with all the criteria fulfilled to exclude pancreatic cancer
Eligibility Criteria
The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis will be based on the clinical information (history of alcohol abuse, previous diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis or diabetes mellitus), as well as a combination of imaging methods (ultrasound, CT and EUS). At least four criteria of chronic pancreatitis during EUS will be considered for the positive diagnosis. A positive cytological diagnosis will be taken as a final proof of malignancy of the pancreas mass. The diagnoses obtained by EUS-FNA will be further verified either by surgery or during a clinical follow-up of at least 6 months.
You may qualify if:
- Patients with suspicion of solid pancreatic tumor masses by previous cross-sectional imaging techniques (US, CT, MR)
- Age 18 to 90 years old, men or women
- Signed informed consent for EUS with contrast-enhancement, elastography and EUS-FNA
You may not qualify if:
- Prior surgical treatment with curative intent or chemo-radiotherapy
- Patients diagnosed with mucin producing tumors, pancreatic cystic tumors, etc.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiovalead
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmarkcollaborator
- Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheimcollaborator
- Institut Paoli-Calmettescollaborator
- University of Witten/Herdeckecollaborator
- Hospital Meiningen Germanycollaborator
- Odense University Hospitalcollaborator
- University of Santiago de Compostelacollaborator
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaelecollaborator
- SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera GmbHcollaborator
- University of Bergencollaborator
- Institutul Clinic Fundenicollaborator
- Glasgow Royal Infirmarycollaborator
- University College, Londoncollaborator
Study Sites (14)
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Gentofte & Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen
Copenhagen, Denmark
Center for Surgical Ultrasound, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital
Odense, Denmark
Paoli-Calmettes Institut
Marseille, France
Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim
Bad Mergentheim, Germany
SRH Wald-Klinikum
Gera, Germany
Department of Internal Medicine II, Hospital Meiningen
Meiningen, Germany
Helios Klinikum, University of Witten/Herdecke
Wuppertal, Germany
Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita Salute San Raffaele University
Milan, Italy
Insitute of Medicine, University of Bergen and National Centre for Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, Norway
Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fundeni Clinical Institute
Bucharest, Romania
Gastroenterology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Craiova, Romania
University Hospital, Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Hepatobiliary Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Institute of Hepatology, University College London
London, United Kingdom
Related Publications (8)
Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, Bolondi L, Bosio M, Calliada F, Correas JM, Darge K, Dietrich C, D'Onofrio M, Evans DH, Filice C, Greiner L, Jager K, Jong Nd, Leen E, Lencioni R, Lindsell D, Martegani A, Meairs S, Nolsoe C, Piscaglia F, Ricci P, Seidel G, Skjoldbye B, Solbiati L, Thorelius L, Tranquart F, Weskott HP, Whittingham T. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) - update 2008. Ultraschall Med. 2008 Feb;29(1):28-44. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963785. No abstract available.
PMID: 18270887BACKGROUNDSeicean A, Badea R, Stan-Iuga R, Gulei I, Pop T, Pascu O. The added value of real-time harmonics contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography for the characterisation of pancreatic diseases in routine practice. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2010 Mar;19(1):99-104.
PMID: 20361085BACKGROUNDHocke M, Schulze E, Gottschalk P, Topalidis T, Dietrich CF. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan 14;12(2):246-50. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i2.246.
PMID: 16482625BACKGROUNDSaftoiu A, Iordache SA, Gheonea DI, Popescu C, Malos A, Gorunescu F, Ciurea T, Iordache A, Popescu GL, Manea CT. Combined contrast-enhanced power Doppler and real-time sonoelastography performed during EUS, used in the differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):739-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.056. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
PMID: 20674916BACKGROUNDSeicean A. Endoscopic ultrasound in chronic pancreatitis: where are we now? World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 14;16(34):4253-63. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i34.4253.
PMID: 20818808BACKGROUNDDietrich CF, Ignee A, Frey H. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound with low mechanical index: a new technique. Z Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;43(11):1219-23. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858662.
PMID: 16267707BACKGROUNDSeicean A, Badea R, Stan-Iuga R, Mocan T, Gulei I, Pascu O. Quantitative contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for the discrimination of solid pancreatic masses. Ultraschall Med. 2010 Dec;31(6):571-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245833. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
PMID: 21080306BACKGROUNDSaftoiu A, Vilmann P, Dietrich CF, Iglesias-Garcia J, Hocke M, Seicean A, Ignee A, Hassan H, Streba CT, Ioncica AM, Gheonea DI, Ciurea T. Quantitative contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS in differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jul;82(1):59-69. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.040. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
PMID: 25792386DERIVED
Related Links
Biospecimen
Pathology samples obtained from duodeno-pancreatectomies or caudal pancreatectomies done with curative intent, as well as microhistological fragments obtained through EUS-FNA biopsy processed by paraffin embedding
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Adrian Săftoiu, Professor
University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2011
First Posted
March 15, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
April 1, 2012
Study Completion
December 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 17, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01