Bipolar Intervention Study: Cognitive Interpersonal Therapy
BISCIT
A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Early Bipolar Disorder
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
2
Brief Summary
There is a need to develop a better understanding of the early phase of bipolar disorder, and to develop and evaluate effective psychosocial interventions that assist people in this phase. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not it is feasible to conduct a larger study of the effectiveness of cognitive interpersonal therapy (a psychological therapy) with individuals who have experienced their first or second treated episode of mania or hypomania (symptoms common in early development of bipolar disorders).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2010
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 30, 2014
CompletedJuly 30, 2014
April 1, 2014
11 months
March 7, 2011
November 11, 2013
July 29, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (Montogomery and Asberg, 1979)
The Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (Montgomery and Asberg, 1979) is a semi-structured interview designed to assess the presence and severity of 10 core symptoms of depression. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. The questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal /symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression \>34 - severe depression
Baseline to End of Study.
Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Rating Scale (BRMS) [Bech et al, 1979]
The Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Rating Scale (BRMS) \[Bech et al, 1979\] provides a structured format for a clinician to assess the presence and severity of 11 core symptoms of hypomania or mania.Higher BRMS score indicates more severe symptoms of mania, and each item yields a score of 0 to 4. The overall score ranges from 0 to 44. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 15 - normal /symptom absent 15 to 20 - mild 21 to 28 - moderate \>34 - severe
Baseline to End of Study
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The Internal State Scale (ISS) (Bauer et al, 1991)
monthly until October 2011
Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF)
monthly until October 2011
Study Arms (2)
Psychological Therapy
EXPERIMENTALCognitive Interpersonal Therapy (CIT) was a psychological therapy which emphasised assessment, engagement and formulation; normalizing and compassionate understanding; specific cognitive-behavioural and interpersonal strategies; self-management and social rhythm regulation; affect regulation, and staying well (Gumley \& Schwannauer, 2006).
Treatment As Usual
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll participants continued to receive their usual care from their local community mental health team and other psychological therapies were not withheld during the conduct of the trial.
Interventions
Cognitive Interpersonal Therapy in Early Bipolar Disorder: Individuals will receive up to six months of individual CIT-BP. CBT will emphasise assessment, engagement and formulation; normalizing and compassionate understanding; specific cognitive and behavioural strategies; self-management and social rhythm regulation; affect regulation, and staying well (Gumley \& Schwannauer, 2006).
The comparison group is treatment as usual (TAU). This will comprise of the individuals normal psychiatric care and will vary with individual and locality and is therefore not specified.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible individuals will have experienced their first or second treated episode of mania and / or hypomania in the previous 12-months prior to study entry.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants will be excluded if there is a (1) diagnosis of learning disability; (2) inability to participate in psychotherapy/research due to acute medical condition or acute mania
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NHS Greater Glasgow and Clydelead
- Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Governmentcollaborator
- University of Glasgowcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Gartnavel Royal Hospital
Glasgow, Lanarkshire, G12 0XH, United Kingdom
NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
A definitive clinical trial should incorporate an appropriate sample size, incorporate more than one therapist, assess fidelity and competence in therapy delivery and also include measurements of health economic dimensions of outcome.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Professor Andrew Gumley
- Organization
- University of Glasgow
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jamie D Kirk, D.Clin.Psy
NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde / University of Glasgow
- STUDY CHAIR
Andrew I Gumley, PhD
University of Glasgow
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Psychologist / Chief Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2011
First Posted
March 15, 2011
Study Start
November 1, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2011
Study Completion
October 1, 2011
Last Updated
July 30, 2014
Results First Posted
July 30, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04