NCT01315028

Brief Summary

There is a need to develop a better understanding of the early phase of bipolar disorder, and to develop and evaluate effective psychosocial interventions that assist people in this phase. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not it is feasible to conduct a larger study of the effectiveness of cognitive interpersonal therapy (a psychological therapy) with individuals who have experienced their first or second treated episode of mania or hypomania (symptoms common in early development of bipolar disorders).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2010

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2010

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 7, 2011

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 15, 2011

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2011

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 30, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

July 30, 2014

Status Verified

April 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

March 7, 2011

Results QC Date

November 11, 2013

Last Update Submit

July 29, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

maniahypomaniabipolar affective disorderpsychological interventioncognitive therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (Montogomery and Asberg, 1979)

    The Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (Montgomery and Asberg, 1979) is a semi-structured interview designed to assess the presence and severity of 10 core symptoms of depression. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. The questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 6 - normal /symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression \>34 - severe depression

    Baseline to End of Study.

  • Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Rating Scale (BRMS) [Bech et al, 1979]

    The Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Rating Scale (BRMS) \[Bech et al, 1979\] provides a structured format for a clinician to assess the presence and severity of 11 core symptoms of hypomania or mania.Higher BRMS score indicates more severe symptoms of mania, and each item yields a score of 0 to 4. The overall score ranges from 0 to 44. Usual cutoff points are: 0 to 15 - normal /symptom absent 15 to 20 - mild 21 to 28 - moderate \>34 - severe

    Baseline to End of Study

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • The Internal State Scale (ISS) (Bauer et al, 1991)

    monthly until October 2011

  • Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF)

    monthly until October 2011

Study Arms (2)

Psychological Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Cognitive Interpersonal Therapy (CIT) was a psychological therapy which emphasised assessment, engagement and formulation; normalizing and compassionate understanding; specific cognitive-behavioural and interpersonal strategies; self-management and social rhythm regulation; affect regulation, and staying well (Gumley \& Schwannauer, 2006).

Other: Cognitive Interpersonal Therapy

Treatment As Usual

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

All participants continued to receive their usual care from their local community mental health team and other psychological therapies were not withheld during the conduct of the trial.

Other: Treatment As Usual

Interventions

Cognitive Interpersonal Therapy in Early Bipolar Disorder: Individuals will receive up to six months of individual CIT-BP. CBT will emphasise assessment, engagement and formulation; normalizing and compassionate understanding; specific cognitive and behavioural strategies; self-management and social rhythm regulation; affect regulation, and staying well (Gumley \& Schwannauer, 2006).

Also known as: Psychological Therapy
Psychological Therapy

The comparison group is treatment as usual (TAU). This will comprise of the individuals normal psychiatric care and will vary with individual and locality and is therefore not specified.

Also known as: Normal clinical care
Treatment As Usual

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Eligible individuals will have experienced their first or second treated episode of mania and / or hypomania in the previous 12-months prior to study entry.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants will be excluded if there is a (1) diagnosis of learning disability; (2) inability to participate in psychotherapy/research due to acute medical condition or acute mania

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Gartnavel Royal Hospital

Glasgow, Lanarkshire, G12 0XH, United Kingdom

Location

NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde

Glasgow, United Kingdom

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ManiaBipolar Disorder

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBipolar and Related DisordersMood DisordersMental Disorders

Limitations and Caveats

A definitive clinical trial should incorporate an appropriate sample size, incorporate more than one therapist, assess fidelity and competence in therapy delivery and also include measurements of health economic dimensions of outcome.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Professor Andrew Gumley
Organization
University of Glasgow

Study Officials

  • Jamie D Kirk, D.Clin.Psy

    NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde / University of Glasgow

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Andrew I Gumley, PhD

    University of Glasgow

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Psychologist / Chief Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2011

First Posted

March 15, 2011

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion

October 1, 2011

Study Completion

October 1, 2011

Last Updated

July 30, 2014

Results First Posted

July 30, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-04

Locations